Clancy Husband in Murder Case

I

I'll be ready!

Elect
Elect
Joined
Jun 7, 2026
Messages
10
Reaction score
3
Points
3
Location
United States
I know I'm probably late to the party as they say when it comes to the Husband but is anyone else shocked her husband is remarried? This quick?
I myself think just that alone should be re-examined.
 
I'll be ready! said:
I know I'm probably late to the party as they say when it comes to the Husband but is anyone else shocked her husband is remarried? This quick?
Click to expand...

Lindsay Clancy committed the murders of their children in January 2023.

She and her husband divorced in February 2024.

Patrick Clancy remarried in the spring of 2026.

Without regard to whether the divorce and remarriage were biblically legitimate or not (and whether the Clancys were Christian or not), I don't think two years is all that "quick."

I'll be ready! said:
I myself think just that alone should be re-examined.
Click to expand...

For what reason? Lindsay Clancy killed their three children. That fact is not in dispute. What Patrick Clancy may or may not have done after the fact is beside the point.
 
My point was how could an individual who had been through such a horrible tragedy. The loss of these children at the hands of an apparently insane individual (debated) That is heartbreaking. The whole situation. It just seems a short time to enter an entire new relationship. The baggage would be intense. I just feel its too fast.
 
I'll be ready! said:
My point was how could an individual who had been through such a horrible tragedy. The loss of these children at the hands of an apparently insane individual (debated) That is heartbreaking. The whole situation. It just seems a short time to enter an entire new relationship. The baggage would be intense. I just feel its too fast.
Click to expand...

I think it's fair, as a matter of private opinion, to question Patrick Clancy's judgment. But to assert that his second marriage needs to be "re-examined"? Re-examined by whom? The law? He's been implicated in no crimes and done nothing to warrant scrutiny. In that respect, his remarriage is his business, not ours.

I'm reminded of the online "influencers" who suggest Erika Kirk was complicit in her husband's murder because, in their estimation, her behaviour since his death isn't "proper" for a grieving widow. We don't get to define that for them, or worse, use it as a springboard for more nefarious accusations. That could easily cross a couple of lines: from having an opinion, to gossip-mongering, and then to actual defamation.
 
You have some good points there. My opinion is not to promote gossip but would wonder of the health of such a short time and hope there were good pastoral counsel. To give good support.
Part of my thinking comes from a case a while back in the news. A tragic murder by strangers of an entire family but the husband found tied up in the basement of the family home. It's fuzzy now but he married a member of the defense team in less than a year after. I was like wow!
 
Someone mentioned Charlie Kirk's wife. I never heard him speak but am catching up over this past year on You Tube. Great speaker. Back on my topic. I'm old fashioned and tend to think that way. I prefer Fox News, Forbes is doing a good job too. I listen to all. They have advertised on CBS a few times that Clancy will be interviewed on 60 minutes tonight He will speak for himself. I'm not the only one with questions. 😆
 
I'll be ready! said:
Someone mentioned Charlie Kirk's wife. I never heard him speak but am catching up over this past year on You Tube. Great speaker. Back on my topic. I'm old fashioned and tend to think that way. I prefer Fox News, Forbes is doing a good job too. I listen to all. They have advertised on CBS a few times that Clancy will be interviewed on 60 minutes tonight He will speak for himself. I'm not the only one with questions. 😆
Click to expand...
Fox News is a republican news outlet. How can you watch them? Do you believe they are actually doing journalism?
 
I'll be ready! said:
I'm old fashioned and tend to think that way.
Click to expand...

Fair.

Conversely, I know of widowers who remarried not much more than six months after their wife died. A bit unusual, but completely lawful and above board. I guess their sense of loneliness was greater than their sense of loss. How people respond to that isn't my business as long as it isn't illegal or sinful.
 
Ransom said:
Yawn. Get another routine, this one's getting stale.
Click to expand...
As long as they are still a republican news outlet they will continue to be labeled a republican news organization.
 
I'll be ready! said:
I know I'm probably late to the party as they say when it comes to the Husband but is anyone else shocked her husband is remarried? This quick?
I myself think just that alone should be re-examined.
Click to expand...
I haven't been following the case, so I looked it up. Patrick has said he forgives Lindsay. For killing the kids? That doesn't sound like someone who really loved his family, and the speed at which he picked up the new relationship also seems to suggest otherwise.

The one who strikes me as the kook in all this is Rachel, the new woman. "Hey, aren't you that guy on T.V. whose wife killed your kids? You poor guy. I'm a fertility doctor. Do you want to start dating?"
 
Last edited:
Ransom said:
I'm reminded of the online "influencers" who suggest Erika Kirk was complicit in her husband's murder because, in their estimation, her behaviour since his death isn't "proper" for a grieving widow.
Click to expand...
Her practically straddling JD on stage in her painted on shiney pants was perfectly normal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top