That when we try and obey The Great Commission, and we get excited to send missionaries out of our churches, but yet when God brings them to our doorsteps, we want them to go back where they came from?
"Obama?s own policy decisions ? allowing Assad to convert peaceful demonstrations into an increasingly ugly civil war, refusing to declare safe havens and no-fly zones ? were instrumental in creating the Syrian refugee crisis. This crisis is in large part the direct consequence of President Obama?s decision to stand aside and watch Syria burn. For him to try and use a derisory and symbolic program to allow 10,000 refugees into the United States in order to posture as more caring than those evil Jacksonian rednecks out in the benighted sticks is one of the most cynical, cold-blooded, and nastily divisive moves an American President has made in a long time."Recovering IFB said:That when we try and obey The Great Commission, and we get excited to send missionaries out of our churches, but yet when God brings them to our doorsteps, we want them to go back where they came from?
Recovering IFB said:That when we try and obey The Great Commission, and we get excited to send missionaries out of our churches, but yet when God brings them to our doorsteps, we want them to go back where they came from?
Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country
Smellin Coffee said:
Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
This is a bit snarky, but does make a good point.
Ransom said:Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
This is a bit snarky, but does make a good point.
That a secular government ought to behave like Jesus taught his followers?
Why are you arguing in favour of a theocracy?
So when The Scriptures say that when a man's ways please God, that God will make his enemies be at peace with him? You don't believe in God? You don't trust in Him to provide the protection for our country? So, who is being "bewy bewy afwaid?"Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin and recovering never met a liberal stereotype they didn't repeat.
To them, Herman Neutic was an immigrant turned away at their border.
What does Psalm 2 say?Tim said:Ransom said:Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
This is a bit snarky, but does make a good point.
That a secular government ought to behave like Jesus taught his followers?
Why are you arguing in favour of a theocracy?
I always took the commandments as personal or for the Church. Not governments.
Recovering IFB said:So when The Scriptures say that when a man's ways please God, that God will make his enemies be at peace with him? You don't believe in God? You don't trust in Him to provide the protection for our country? So, who is being "bewy bewy afwaid?"Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin and recovering never met a liberal stereotype they didn't repeat.
To them, Herman Neutic was an immigrant turned away at their border.
It's funny, all along on this site, I was labeled antinomian, when all along it was others here who are the real antinomians.
Don't put your trust in chariots or horses brothers......
Ransom said:Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
This is a bit snarky, but does make a good point.
That a secular government ought to behave like Jesus taught his followers?
Why are you arguing in favour of a theocracy?
Tim said:Ransom said:Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
This is a bit snarky, but does make a good point.
That a secular government ought to behave like Jesus taught his followers?
Why are you arguing in favour of a theocracy?
I always took the commandments as personal or for the Church. Not governments.
Smellin Coffee said:Tim said:Ransom said:Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
This is a bit snarky, but does make a good point.
That a secular government ought to behave like Jesus taught his followers?
Why are you arguing in favour of a theocracy?
I always took the commandments as personal or for the Church. Not governments.
So you are for the legality of gay marriage as an equal right?
Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin Coffee said:Tim said:Ransom said:Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
This is a bit snarky, but does make a good point.
That a secular government ought to behave like Jesus taught his followers?
Why are you arguing in favour of a theocracy?
I always took the commandments as personal or for the Church. Not governments.
So you are for the legality of gay marriage as an equal right?
If he actually took the commands as personal, he would actually be for the stoning of sodomites?
Smellin Coffee said:Tim said:Ransom said:Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
This is a bit snarky, but does make a good point.
That a secular government ought to behave like Jesus taught his followers?
Why are you arguing in favour of a theocracy?
I always took the commandments as personal or for the Church. Not governments.
So you are for the legality of gay marriage as an equal right?
I put my trust in the entire council of God, I don't pick and choose, especially when your god of this world says different!Tarheel Baptist said:Recovering IFB said:So when The Scriptures say that when a man's ways please God, that God will make his enemies be at peace with him? You don't believe in God? You don't trust in Him to provide the protection for our country? So, who is being "bewy bewy afwaid?"Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin and recovering never met a liberal stereotype they didn't repeat.
To them, Herman Neutic was an immigrant turned away at their border.
It's funny, all along on this site, I was labeled antinomian, when all along it was others here who are the real antinomians.
Don't put your trust in chariots or horses brothers......
Its vewy, vewy afwaid....get it right!
And that's what Smellin is...you are a CR!
Don't put your trust in Rushdooney, either.
Smellin Coffee said:Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin Coffee said:Tim said:Ransom said:Smellin Coffee said:What I find interesting is the party that is striving for a theocracy in this country, has totally missed the boat.
This is a bit snarky, but does make a good point.
That a secular government ought to behave like Jesus taught his followers?
Why are you arguing in favour of a theocracy?
I always took the commandments as personal or for the Church. Not governments.
So you are for the legality of gay marriage as an equal right?
If he actually took the commands as personal, he would actually be for the stoning of sodomites?
Hmmm...
Residents of Sodom were not stoned by others. Methinks you never really met your friend Herman.
(Oh wait, a little "s". But this as term instead of as a resident isn't biblical either.)
Smellin Coffee said:Nope. That isn't my argument at all. My point is those who would claim to want a theocractic form of government are going about it the wrong way.