Does Love = Coersion

Recovering IFB said:
Where's all this arguing between "Calvinist" that you're talking about?

CU reserves the right to make stuff up, then castigate others for not believing what he says they are supposed to.

In the case of a conflict between reality and CU, reality is wrong.
 
Ransom said:
Recovering IFB said:
Where's all this arguing between "Calvinist" that you're talking about?

CU reserves the right to make stuff up, then castigate others for not believing what he says they are supposed to.

In the case of a conflict between reality and CU, reality is wrong.

I gave an example. You know very well that there are Calvinist that do not agree with one another on core aspects of the teachings of Calvin. You know this. You can be dishonest all you want about it and make "fun" of me in the process. This doesn't change the facts.
 
praise_yeshua said:
Ransom said:
Recovering IFB said:
Where's all this arguing between "Calvinist" that you're talking about?

CU reserves the right to make stuff up, then castigate others for not believing what he says they are supposed to.

In the case of a conflict between reality and CU, reality is wrong.

I gave an example. You know very well that there are Calvinist that do not agree with one another on core aspects of the teachings of Calvin. You know this. You can be dishonest all you want about it and make "fun" of me in the process. This doesn't change the facts.

The question is; are there any Christians that you agree with?  :-\
 
subllibrm said:
praise_yeshua said:
Ransom said:
Recovering IFB said:
Where's all this arguing between "Calvinist" that you're talking about?

CU reserves the right to make stuff up, then castigate others for not believing what he says they are supposed to.

In the case of a conflict between reality and CU, reality is wrong.

I gave an example. You know very well that there are Calvinist that do not agree with one another on core aspects of the teachings of Calvin. You know this. You can be dishonest all you want about it and make "fun" of me in the process. This doesn't change the facts.

The question is; are there any Christians that you agree with?  :-\

Sure. I agree often with them. I even gave Ransom a "greenie" right after my response. I agree or disagree regardless of "who" is involved.
 
praise_yeshua said:
Ransom said:
Recovering IFB said:
Where's all this arguing between "Calvinist" that you're talking about?

CU reserves the right to make stuff up, then castigate others for not believing what he says they are supposed to.

In the case of a conflict between reality and CU, reality is wrong.

I gave an example. You know very well that there are Calvinist that do not agree with one another on core aspects of the teachings of Calvin.

I already told you, "Calvinism" is shorthand for a doctrine, not a way to reference the exact teachings of Calvin. 

Plus, what does it prove if Calvinists disagree with each other on certain points?  Free willers disagree with each other on certain points, too.  So?  I'm pretty sure doctrine isn't made true by majority vote. 
 
The Rogue Tomato said:
praise_yeshua said:
Ransom said:
Recovering IFB said:
Where's all this arguing between "Calvinist" that you're talking about?

CU reserves the right to make stuff up, then castigate others for not believing what he says they are supposed to.

In the case of a conflict between reality and CU, reality is wrong.

I gave an example. You know very well that there are Calvinist that do not agree with one another on core aspects of the teachings of Calvin.

I already told you, "Calvinism" is shorthand for a doctrine, not a way to reference the exact teachings of Calvin. 

Plus, what does it prove if Calvinists disagree with each other on certain points?  Free willers disagree with each other on certain points, too.  So?  I'm pretty sure doctrine isn't made true by majority vote.

I wasn't the one saying that Calvinism is totally consistent with anything. I'm glad you agree with me.
 
Once you people realize that it isn't either/or but both you will have so much less wadding up your panties.
 
subllibrm said:
Once you people realize that it isn't either/or but both you will have so much less wadding up your panties.
This.
 
subllibrm said:
Once you people realize that it isn't either/or but both you will have so much less wadding up your panties.

Get a grip. I've never said it was a choice between the two. If you READ what I wrote, you'll see that I'm neither. In fact, I've said recently that the arguments are childish.
 
praise_yeshua said:
subllibrm said:
Once you people realize that it isn't either/or but both you will have so much less wadding up your panties.

Get a grip. I've never said it was a choice between the two. If you READ what I wrote, you'll see that I'm neither. In fact, I've said recently that the arguments are childish.

Including your own? :)
 
The Rogue Tomato said:
praise_yeshua said:
subllibrm said:
Once you people realize that it isn't either/or but both you will have so much less wadding up your panties.

Get a grip. I've never said it was a choice between the two. If you READ what I wrote, you'll see that I'm neither. In fact, I've said recently that the arguments are childish.

Including your own? :)

You know nothing more than just a couple of my arguments. I can't get any of you to engage to a point  that it makes it worth going beyond what I've already wrote. :)
 
praise_yeshua said:
subllibrm said:
Once you people realize that it isn't either/or but both you will have so much less wadding up your panties.

Get a grip. I've never said it was a choice between the two. If you READ what I wrote, you'll see that I'm neither. In fact, I've said recently that the arguments are childish.

Who said I was talking to you?
 
subllibrm said:
praise_yeshua said:
subllibrm said:
Once you people realize that it isn't either/or but both you will have so much less wadding up your panties.

Get a grip. I've never said it was a choice between the two. If you READ what I wrote, you'll see that I'm neither. In fact, I've said recently that the arguments are childish.

Who said I was talking to you?

Who were you talking to... everyone but me?
 
praise_yeshua said:
subllibrm said:
praise_yeshua said:
subllibrm said:
Once you people realize that it isn't either/or but both you will have so much less wadding up your panties.

Get a grip. I've never said it was a choice between the two. If you READ what I wrote, you'll see that I'm neither. In fact, I've said recently that the arguments are childish.

Who said I was talking to you?

Who were you talking to... everyone but me?

How about anyone who has their panties in wad? You can decide whether that is you or not.
 
Back
Top