We'll at least be on the same side fighting pedophilia!Tarheel Baptist said:The short answer to the OP's question is the acceptance of pedophilia and incest.
Polygamy is a given....
We'll at least be on the same side fighting pedophilia!Tarheel Baptist said:The short answer to the OP's question is the acceptance of pedophilia and incest.
Polygamy is a given....
Izdaari said:1. Government encouragement, support and even requirement of sex education courses, prepared and taught by homosexual women and men, presenting homosexuality.
Oh, c'mon! Sex ed courses are taught by regular HS teachers. There's no way to get enough gay teachers to do it. But requiring sex ed courses is already standard.
Izdaari said:16. Make homosexuals look good by publicizing famous homosexuals who are well-liked by the general public.
Sure, that's just good PR.
I agree that's what's going to happen, though I would skip the moral decay and persecution spin.Tim said:Next? Simple. More and more "Churches" will accept gay marriage and transgenders as normal people and move away from the traditional stand that these people are simply sick in need of a physician. The political correctness of the Church in general will grow and leave America more and more vulnerable to further its moral breakdown. This in turn will create great persecution for any Church that takes a stand against the moral breakdown for not only will government be against them, but a large community of "Churches" ....
Izdaari said:Speaking as an actual gay rights activist,.......... I believe in winning debates, not silencing the opposition.
Sure, but note that my agenda is not the same as the one taken from that website. I shared that with you all so I could speak with some authority on what IS and IS NOT the gay agenda. Yes, I'm an interested party, but I'm something of an insider on the subject, and so have some expertise on it. Of course, gay rights advocates are not monolithic, and different people in it may have different opinions.JrChurch said:Izdaari said:Speaking as an actual gay rights activist,.......... I believe in winning debates, not silencing the opposition.
Well, this explains why you are on every "gay rights" thread promoting your pro-gay agenda.
The part that's likely to be taken as hate speech is not "is sinful", but the first word.Tarheel Baptist said:What's next/already happening is that saying 'sodomy is sinful' will be declared hate speech.
Izdaari said:The part that's likely to be taken as hate speech is not "is sinful", but the first word.Tarheel Baptist said:What's next/already happening is that saying 'sodomy is sinful' will be declared hate speech.
I'm sure some will say that, but I won't. I accept that as being within the range of civilized opinion. It is after all what the majority of conservative Christians believe, though that is changing. It's the words "sodomy" and "sodomite" that I object to because they are pejorative and are intended to be, like the "N word". The difference is no doubt that I'm not of the progressive left but the libertarian right.Tarheel Baptist said:Izdaari said:The part that's likely to be taken as hate speech is not "is sinful", but the first word.Tarheel Baptist said:What's next/already happening is that saying 'sodomy is sinful' will be declared hate speech.
Again, you are mistaken, IMO.
You protest to my wording...but it doesn't matter what you call it, Homosexuality, being 'Gay' or sodomy....if you add that it is wrong or sinful behavior, it will be called 'hate speech'. That is the M.O. of the looney liberal left.
http://www.youngcons.com/college-employee-being-investigated-for-saying-there-are-only-two-genders/
Izdaari said:I'm sure some will say that, but I won't. I accept that as being within the range of civilized opinion. It is after all what the majority of conservative Christians believe, though that is changing. It's the words "sodomy" and "sodomite" that I object to because they are pejorative and are intended to be, like the "N word". The difference is no doubt that I'm not of the progressive left but the libertarian right.Tarheel Baptist said:Izdaari said:The part that's likely to be taken as hate speech is not "is sinful", but the first word.Tarheel Baptist said:What's next/already happening is that saying 'sodomy is sinful' will be declared hate speech.
Again, you are mistaken, IMO.
You protest to my wording...but it doesn't matter what you call it, Homosexuality, being 'Gay' or sodomy....if you add that it is wrong or sinful behavior, it will be called 'hate speech'. That is the M.O. of the looney liberal left.
http://www.youngcons.com/college-employee-being-investigated-for-saying-there-are-only-two-genders/
Saying there are only two genders is a different statement than that homosexual activity is sinful. If the employee in question was repeating Catholic doctrine, that should be protected under freedom of religion, but it could still be contrary to company policy.