Depends on which line of manuscripts you follow.
The oldest and most reliable are not the 'most reliable'.
What is your evidence for this claim?
Depends on which line of manuscripts you follow.
The oldest and most reliable are not the 'most reliable'.
Then why do you insist that one must know Greek to know the Truth?1. Through study and reflection upon multiple English translation that should progress to learning the translation process and all it entales.
To be able to interact with commentaries and writers who cite the languages (both Greek and Hebrew) and see if they are accurate.2. Why did you study Greek? It is obvious from your own actions you believe it was important to study Greek to know the Truth.
If the Gospel is not involved, then why do you capitalize the word "Truth?" Why insist that one must know Greek if what you say in #1 is true?3. That is your narrative. You're wrong. I'm trying to get people to really know the Truth. Not rely upon others but get it from the source. Just like those noble Christians at Brea.
Depends on which line of manuscripts you follow.
Does Bigfoot or Hitler's faked death fit into it, too?This guy gets it. It's a pretty easy study. Most of it begins by figuring out that the Septuagint is a lie.
Most of it begins by figuring out that the Septuagint is a lie.
Hey, Ronald McDonald, if the LXX wasn't a "BC invention," can you explain why fragments of it were found in the Qumran caves with the rest of the Dead Sea Scrolls?As far as being a "BC" invention, yes.
This guy gets it. It's a pretty easy study. Most of it begins by figuring out that the Septuagint is a lie.