Of course. But I don't believe humanity has the capability or the knowledge to comprehend the nuances of what that truth is or how that truth can/should be related to behaviors. We are so finite, humanity will never be able to come to all those conclusions. Hence, science changes as information develops because we are learning new information about given subjects that had never been discovered or applied before. True science GENERALLY holds truth for what it is at the moment but should parameters be introduced, it flexes enough to accept new data and drift that direction.
If God exists outside of time and space, humanity is incapable of understanding outside of the time/space continuum. We cannot know its origins, its existence, its possible interaction within time/space, etc. All we can do is project what we believe that thing is. We have to believe finite testimony "Bible, Quran, etc.) about the unknowable which means all we have is perception and projection. That perception and projection is created on culture, knowledge, search for possible reason and bias, hence the Native "god" is believed in and differs from Zeus which is different than Jehovah which is different than Dionysus, etc. Time and cultures identify "god" differently because the drift (and along with that, a belief of the source of the drift) will always be a human element to the unknown.
If both a Christian and a Muslim pray and become healed from cancer, either will claim it was his god that healed them both. Of course there is no positive link between any "god" and the healings of both but it certainly can be perceived and believed. Neither is right and yet both are right. "God" is the placeholder identity of that which we cannot know or understand.
