Were the infants guilty?Seriously?
Were the infants guilty?Seriously?
Nope. Sins of the parents often make their children unintended victims.Were the infants guilty?
There are people in the world of philosophy (including Christians) who believe in the theory of tabula rasa. I don’t, but Ekklesian might fall in that camp.Nope. Sins of the parents often make their children unintended victims.
Nope. Sins of the parents often make their children unintended victims.
Perhaps God would be interested in your counsel as to how He should have judged their disobedient parents.Unintended by God? It was his flood.
Perhaps God would be interested in your counsel as to how He should have judged their disobedient parents.
I think Ransom’s point is that God sovereignly determined to take the life of children, regardless of their disposition as progeny under Adam’s federal headship.Perhaps God would be interested in your counsel as to how He should have judged their disobedient parents.
Unless He sovereignly declared them so, like John in the womb….but that’s all I’m sayin’ about that can of worms, lol.More to the point, if they were under Adam's federal headship, they weren't innocent.
I knew you were playing devil's advocate... but that would be my response to such a question.I'm not the one saying God intentionally committed the mass murder of innocent babies.
Just what I'd expect a good Calvie to say.More to the point, if they were under Adam's federal headship, they weren't innocent.
I knew you were playing devil's advocate... but that would be my response to such a question.
Like those taken in the Tenth Plague? If not guilty, would you say they were righteous?Nope. Sins of the parents often make their children unintended victims.
There is none righteous, no not one.Like those taken in the Tenth Plague? If not guilty, would you say they were righteous?
Exactly. No innocent people in the universe. God is never unrighteous to condemn anyone.There is none righteous, no not one.
Agreed. There is no neutral ground. If not righteous, then the only alternative is guilt.There is none righteous, no not one.
Absolutely.Agreed. There is no neutral ground. If not righteous, then the only alternative is guilt.
I did listen to it . . . about the Ark and Dagon and its return. I'm not sure which topics it touches on in this thread specifically.Absolutely.
If you haven't yet, check out the message I posted a link to just above. It presents a fantastic perspective of God's righteous judgement and His mercy especially in light of the discussion in this thread.
Did you catch what he was saying about people asking why the OT portrays a God of judgement? Paul pointed out how He dealt with the Philistines in grace by the way He revealed Himself to them even though they didn't get it.I did listen to it . . . about the Ark and Dagon and its return. I'm not sure which topics it touches on in this thread specifically.