You may describe the writings of KJV-only authors, but you do not describe accurately all the writings of believers who disagree with unsound, erroneous, human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning/teaching. Poor logic even false logic [use of fallacies] is very common in KJV-only writings and in posts seeking to defend erroneous KJV-only reasoning.The stance of the Anti-KJV "scholar" crowd is one of denial, poor logic, laziness, an affinity to make everything "incalculable" along with a lack of understanding of basic mathematics. They're amateurs.
Disagreeing with KJV-only reasoning does not lead to the bogus claim that someone is supposedly "anti-KJV." The undefined, bogus smear term "anti-KJV" may be an example of how KJV-only advocates will disobey clear scriptural commands such as "Thou shalt not bear false witness." It is likely that they cannot define their term of accusation "anti-KJV" and apply it justly without making the KJV translators in effect into "anti-KJV" scholars.
I am not anti-KJV. I read the KJV [have read it over 50 years]. I accept and defend the KJV as what it actually is. The KJV is the word of God translated into English in the same sense or in the same way that the pre-1611 English Bibles of which the KJV is a revision are the word of God translated into English and in the same sense that post-1611 English Bibles such as the NKJV are the word of God translated into English.