I already soundly informed you that I do not need to address your "likely" speculations since my position has nothing to do with the Critical Text.Still haven't addressed this in any detail whatsoever I see. Probably because you either don't understand it or you can't think of a refutation because it's right.
Perhaps you do not understand your own speculations as well as you may assume since they remain only "likely" speculations, and not proven facts.
There is no need to refute your speculations that do not answer nor refute my scripturally-based position.
Your weak "likely" scenario clearly does not outweigh my advocating of a just application of scriptural truths.