prophet said:If they did it with out his approval...Mathew Ward said:prophet said:If he did this without his Father's permission, it was unethical.Mathew Ward said:Twisted said:Mathew Ward said:prophet said:Again, I say...it is hard to see Christ in any of this.
earnestly contend
It is fairly simple.
His father messed up.
Eric stepped in and took the ministry a different direction.
Dad got out and wanted total control back, like nothing happened, and didn't care the diection that it was going.
"His father messed up." - Without a doubt. That is my opinion.
"Eric stepped in and took the ministry a different direction." - No, Eric started his own ministry on the coattails of his dad. His "ministry" (God Quest?) is what purchased his dad's property.
"Dad got out and wanted total control back, like nothing happened, and didn't care the diection [sic] that it was going." - I have no idea how you would know the motives of Kent. But somehow you think it wrong that Kent wanted to run his own ministry? Odd.
There is no doubt that the Hovind family problems are a direct result of the actions taken by Kent. However, that in no way excuses the behavior of his family towards him. IMO
If Eric started his own ministry and bailed out his fathers fallen, failed ministry which made it his, so to speak) why would they give it back? Odd that you don't want Eric to run his own ministry...
earnestly contend
I think the board took it out of Kent's hands and rightly so I might add.
earnestly contend
That is why a ministry has a board. They are not yes men but should take action and remove a ceo when he doesn't act appropriately.
It isn't unethical to remove him.