Over 40? Fat? Want your life back?

FSSL said:
Hooper said:
Your opinion that scripture is perfect is not a defensible argument.

Which makes your selective quotations of Scripture absurd. If it is not perfect, then don?t use any of it.

The fact remains that our physiology was not designed for animal flesh.

Do you have rabbit teeth?

I have no problem biting and salivating over a bone-in ribeye. Medium-rare... closer to rare the better!


God reveals truth to those willing to see it. There are some truths found in Saul's works. He mixes truth with error making his lies more difficult to spot. Your desire for rare meats is not of God but was introduced to man by the  Nephelim.  I'm sure you would agree that a spiritually blind man can not understand perfect scripture?  Equally so, those who can see are able to see with no scripture.


John 16:13
Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.



 
Hooper said:
God reveals truth to those willing to see it. There are some truths found in Saul's works. He mixes truth with error making his lies more difficult to spot. Your desire for rare meats is not of God but was introduced to man by the  Nephelim.  I'm sure you would agree that a spiritually blind man can not understand perfect scripture?  Equally so, those who can see are able to see with no scripture.

Here is a problem:  Many a television preacher has hustled many a naive viewer with the words "God revealed to me."

God reveals truth to some people and not to others:  so you say.  And the difference is that some can see and some can't: so you say  And who is to determine what is truth and wht is not?

If God cannot reveal truth to some, then who are you to presume that you can?

I prefer to base my doctrine on what the 66 books of the Bible say -- not on what I think they mean or on what "God reveals to me."  The Bible is clear enough as it is to those who are willing to spend the time reading and contemplating what it says.  That is why I am so certain of those things, which I preach.
 
Route_70 said:
Hooper said:
God reveals truth to those willing to see it. There are some truths found in Saul's works. He mixes truth with error making his lies more difficult to spot. Your desire for rare meats is not of God but was introduced to man by the  Nephelim.  I'm sure you would agree that a spiritually blind man can not understand perfect scripture?  Equally so, those who can see are able to see with no scripture.

Here is a problem:  Many a television preacher has hustled many a naive viewer with the words "God revealed to me."

God reveals truth to some people and not to others:  so you say.  And the difference is that some can see and some can't: so you say  And who is to determine what is truth and wht is not?

If God cannot reveal truth to some, then who are you to presume that you can?

I prefer to base my doctrine on what the 66 books of the Bible say -- not on what I think they mean or on what "God reveals to me."  The Bible is clear enough as it is to those who are willing to spend the time reading and contemplating what it says.  That is why I am so certain of those things, which I preach.


Those duped by TV preachers are making the mistake of getting the truth from a man and not from God.  Not all men can understand all truth. God reveals truth to those who can understand it it's that simple.
 
Hooper said:
Not all men can understand all truth. God reveals truth to those who can understand it it's that simple.

Do you say that based upon what you read in the Bible, or upon what God has revealed to you?
 
Hooper said:
Quite right. Maybe he was presuming that there's more truth found in the Hebrew version of scripture??

LOL!  Prolly!
 
Hooper said:
Those duped by TV preachers are making the mistake of getting the truth from a man and not from God.

Sort of like how, when you say the Holy Spirit has revealed some truth to you, the only evidence we have to go on is the word of a man - you.
 
Ransom said:
Hooper said:
Those duped by TV preachers are making the mistake of getting the truth from a man and not from God.

Sort of like how, when you say the Holy Spirit has revealed some truth to you, the only evidence we have to go on is the word of a man - you.

I'm not asking for money.
 
Hooper said:
HeDied4U said:
Hooper said:
HeDied4U said:
I'm a second-hand vegetarian. Cows eat grass, I eat cows. Works for me.

:D :D

Is that you in the picture? And why the helmet?

Yes, that is me in the picture...18 months and 45 pounds ago.

I'm wearing the helmet because the charity ride I was participating in had a "no helmet, no ride" policy and since I had raised close to $300.00, I figured I could wear a helmet for a few hours.


Its a proven fact that eating the diet we were created for will not only keep us thin, it will reverse many other illness deemed incurable by the medical community. Good job on the weight loss. I too enjoy bike riding.

Well, that's just it, I really didn't eat any kind of vegetarian, vegan or any other "special" diet to help me lose the weight. As far as meals were concerned, I continued to eat what I had been eating before, including all kinds of meat, but just in smaller quantities. I also got my lazy butt off the couch and onto the bike more often (and started walking more), thus getting a lot more exercise. Cutting out some of the junky snacks I had been eating helped as well.

My health is better, I now feel like I did when I was in my 30's (I'm in my early 50's nowadays) and I've cut my medication consumption by better than half in that time, so yeah, no special diet needed for this guy.

:)
 
Jesse Watters on Saturday debated a doctoral candidate from Penn State University, who contended that eating meat reinforces gender stereotypes.

As FoxNews.com reported, Anne DeLessio-Parson published an article in the "Journal of Feminist Geography" after studying Argentina's "meat-centric culture."

On "Watters' World," Watters challenged her on the claim, and enjoyed a late-night snack during the debate.

DeLessio-Parson said Watters was slightly incorrect when he said consuming meat "creates toxic masculinity" because the phenomenon is "already there."

She said it "reinforces certain social structures, including patriarchy" through its "symbolism."

Watters then produced some symbolism of his own, as a producer laid a plate of steak -- "medium rare" -- in front of him.

"Is this bad -- that I'm eating meat?" he asked.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/12/17/jesse-watters-eats-steak-debating-toxic-masculinity-eating-meat-professor

I know the linked article is more in reference to the "toxic masculinity" of meat eating rather than the health risks supposedly associated with eating meat, but this thread makes me want to get a sirloin out of my freezer and cook it up chow down...along with some thick cut fries on the side.

:)
 
Route_70 said:
Hooper said:
Quite right. Maybe he was presuming that there's more truth found in the Hebrew version of scripture??

LOL!  Prolly!

You are not Jewish.
You don't live in Israel.
You don't follow Jewish customs. They eat meat.
You don't know Hebrew AND you don't even know the proper ENGLISH transliteration of  "Yeshua."

What "Hebrew Root" do you even have?
 
Ransom said:
Hooper said:
I'm not asking for money.

You're not very good at understanding the point, either.


The point is that I or anybody can say anything they want. It's the ignorant people that decide not to use the Holy Spirit and trust in their perfect Scriptures that are easily duped, people like you.
 
FSSL said:
Route_70 said:
Hooper said:
Quite right. Maybe he was presuming that there's more truth found in the Hebrew version of scripture??

LOL!  Prolly!

You are not Jewish.
You don't live in Israel.
You don't follow Jewish customs. They eat meat.
You don't know Hebrew AND you don't even know the proper ENGLISH transliteration of  "Yeshua."

What "Hebrew Root" do you even have?

You can not even define a Jew so I wouldn't be talking. Yahshua is a perfectly accepted transliteration. I don't follow your pagan church fathers remember? Are you so pathetic that you just have some deep need to be right about something? Keep trying. Maybe you could look back at all my posts with Scott and find a misspelled word.  Then you could dismiss all the other things you can't prove wrong.
 
Hooper said:
You can not even define a Jew

About this you are correct.  This is just one of many things biblical about which these people are ignorant.
 
Hooper said:
You can not even define a Jew so I wouldn't be talking. Yahshua is a perfectly accepted transliteration.

You don't know Hebrew. So, how in the world can you even discern that Yahshua is perfectly acceptable?!!

Jehovah's Witnesses think that Jehovah is an acceptable transliteration as well.

In Hebrew the vowel point (sh?wa) is ALWAYS transliterated as an "e" because it sounds like an "e" and NEVER sounds like "ah." The ONLY people who use "Yahshua" are the cultic Sacred Namers. Why? Because they don't know Hebrew, either!
 
Back
Top