- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,833
- Reaction score
- 3,925
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
I quit responding because there comes a point where there will be no agreement
You quit responding because you can only say "Is too!" so many times. You've certainly done no analysis of Revelation to prove your point. You rushed off to the Old Testament. Typical Dispensational study: Dispensationalism is the start and end of your hermeneutic, and no text of Scripture can be allowed to contradict it. You've told us what Dispensationalism says "saints" must mean in Revelation, but you've done not a scrap of exegesis on Revelation to prove John uses it that way.
Unfortunately for St. John, he never saw Clarence Larkin's charts.
Last edited: