Question for someone who is still IFB please...

Gal 5:22-25
22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
23 Meekness, temperance:against such there is no law.

24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.
 
praise_yeshua said:
The Spirit of God is the "basis" for Christian morality. There is no meaningful morality to be had apart from the Spirit of God. None. You are incapable of fulfilling the law. You are incapable of meeting the righteous demands of the law. In fact, in and of yourself, you can not cease from sin. It is impossible. It is beyond you to cease from sin. Only through the empowerment and morality of the Spirit of God can you..... do what is pleasing to God.

This is true but the Bible reveals to us the nature of God. God is Love. God is Life. He  also gave us commands like do not kill, love your enemy. These commands (and many others)  help us follow the nature of God.

Paul even tells us the law is holy [Romans 6]. Is not holiness part of the Nature of God? Without the Word (which God exalted above his own name) every Christians interpretation of God's nature would produce a different set of morality.

Yes we need Grace to do right, but we also cannot do right without Knowledge (Law).

I never gave an excuse to sin. I gave the solution. A solution is not an excuse.

I'll never be judged according to my sin or rewarded according to my iniquities. There is a natural law in this life of death. If you sow to "dead things".... you'll reap "dead things". Thank God, the last enemy to be destroyed will be "death" and all its workings. We have the very promise of God on this...

I never claimed you did. Simply asked what Freedom meant to you. I was pointing out that in the verse freedom could just as easily refer to Salvation (freedom from Hell) as it could refer to freedom from the LAW. Also showed how the Scriptures say we will deal with the consequences of our action even after Salvation.

You then went on some bunny trail about how death will not touch you. For one death is not the only seed Christians sows. If you sow lies you will reap dishonest. If you sow hatred , you will reap hatred.


While you like to cherry pick verses..... you looked over the discourse in Romans where Paul talked of the blessedness of the man in whom "God will not impute sin. " 

Yet you ignore verse 24 that show Righteousness is imputed to us for justification (salvation) not sanctification.  We should never add our own righteousness to salvation, but the Law's purpose was always to tells us what sin is (Romans 3:20,31)

Very simple simple answer. Sin existed before the Law of God was ever given. In fact, read your Bible....

Rom 5:13  (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

Yes sin existed before the law but it was dead [Romans 7:8]. Even the verse you quoted reinforces that God did not hold man accountable for sin until AFTER the law. Without the knowledge of sin (law) man could not have morality. Which is what I claimed.

Now... just how was sin imputed after the giving of the Law?

Read the answer....

Rom 5:20  Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
Rom 5:21  That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

2Co 5:21  For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

Imputation of Sin? These verses all talk about the imputation of Righteousness not the imputation of Sin. They also all refer to salvation not sanctification.

I have simple question for you. A question most people ignore. Do you still sin? Have you ceased from sin?

This is a good question. The simple answer is in my flesh I can only sin. In the spirit I can only do right. Every day we are bombarded with temptation to sin and must chose to yield to the spirit or the flesh. This struggle is best summed up by Paul in Romans 7:15-25.
 
IMO, it's very disheartening that a person has to go into great detail to find a reason for women not to wear pants.

But, to explain the gospel to an average person, not as many Scripture is needed....which is more important? 
 
Thomas Cassidy said:
praise_yeshua said:
There has never been any division in the Law of God. The Law of God is the Law of God. We've been freed from such demands. ALL its demands. There is no seperation in which some apply and some don't.

The division you describe are nothing more than the vain imaginations of fallen man.
LOL! So, all 613 OT commands/laws were written on the tablets Moses brought down from the mountain. Then Moses decided to only publish the Reader's Digest version.

LOL! ROFLOL!

Why are you laughing? You made no such distinction in the division you listed? Why are you being dishonest now?

How do the laws written in stone differ from Law given by Moses?

By the way. You've haven't keep the 10 commandments and I dare say you don't keep them now.
 
TheVoice said:
This is true but the Bible reveals to us the nature of God. God is Love. God is Life. He  also gave us commands like do not kill, love your enemy. These commands (and many others)  help us follow the nature of God.

Just where did you read "God is love"...... in the Law given by Moses? Please share.....

By the way, the Law given to Moses said "an eye for an eye". Not to love your enemies. Jesus witnessed to this Matthew 5.

Paul even tells us the law is holy [Romans 6]. Is not holiness part of the Nature of God? Without the Word (which God exalted above his own name) every Christians interpretation of God's nature would produce a different set of morality.

Its Romans 7 and finish what Paul said. He said "he wasn't holy" or

Rom 7:14  For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Rom 7:15  For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

Yes we need Grace to do right, but we also cannot do right without Knowledge (Law).

Are you saying the Spirit of God doesn't impart knowledge?..... What a "revelation".
I never claimed you did. Simply asked what Freedom meant to you. I was pointing out that in the verse freedom could just as easily refer to Salvation (freedom from Hell) as it could refer to freedom from the LAW. Also showed how the Scriptures say we will deal with the consequences of our action even after Salvation.

Just what does these verses mean to you?

Rom 8:2  For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
Rom 8:3  For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

I talked about the natural law that exists in this life. A law that preexisted the law of Moses and determined death upon every man. A law that is still affects the believer. It has nothing to do with the "Law of God" given to Moses.

Do you realize that death reigned from Adam to Moses? Even upon those who didn't sin after the transgression of Adam himself? Why is that? Do you know why and what relationship it has to the "Law of God"?

You then went on some bunny trail about how death will not touch you. For one death is not the only seed Christians sows. If you sow lies you will reap dishonest. If you sow hatred , you will reap hatred.

Bunny trail? I didn't know you where the one defining the "trail" this discussion should follow!!!! If you're having a hard time following, then we can stay on the "yellow brick road". Just.... next time, set the rules out in the open.... BEFORE... you take issue with what "trail" I take.

Gal 2:18  For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.
Gal 2:19  For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.
Gal 2:20  I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
Gal 2:21  I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

Yet you ignore verse 24 that show Righteousness is imputed to us for justification (salvation) not sanctification.  We should never add our own righteousness to salvation, but the Law's purpose was always to tells us what sin is (Romans 3:20,31)

This is getting juicy.... So... Sanctification comes by keeping the "Law of God"? Be specific. Don't talk around it.....

As a Christian, do you have fellowship with God when you sin? Notice I said "when you sin". Don't pretend you've ceased sinning.
Yes sin existed before the law but it was dead [Romans 7:8]. Even the verse you quoted reinforces that God did not hold man accountable for sin until AFTER the law. Without the knowledge of sin (law) man could not have morality. Which is what I claimed.

Don't misapply Romans 7:8. Paul was speaking of himself. Not the order or revelation in the giving of the Law of God.

Imputation of Sin? These verses all talk about the imputation of Righteousness not the imputation of Sin. They also all refer to salvation not sanctification.

Get a grip man.... Don't twist what I said. The imputation of Righteousness upon man didn't come about until the imputation of sin upon the Lord Jesus Christ. It wasn't HIS sin. IT was OUR sin that He bore in His own body on the tree. The RIGHTEOUS for the UNRIGHTEOUS. This the very core of what is witnessed in the verses I quoted.

Rom 5:15  But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.
Rom 5:16  And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.
Rom 5:17  For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
Rom 5:18  Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
Rom 5:19  For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

This is a good question. The simple answer is in my flesh I can only sin. In the spirit I can only do right. Every day we are bombarded with temptation to sin and must chose to yield to the spirit or the flesh. This struggle is best summed up by Paul in Romans 7:15-25.

Man.... we go through all of this for you say you can only do right through the Spirit..... you must agree with me then? If you can only do right through the Spirit, then why are you talking about a law that you can only serve through the FLESH?



 
praise_yeshua said:
The Spirit of God is the "basis" for Christian morality.

I think it goes one layer deeper: the teachings of Jesus Christ. One of the things the Spirit was sent to do was "to bring to remembrance the things I (Jesus) have taught you".

So if the Spirit is being true, it seems logical to me that the Spirit's basis of morality points to Jesus' teaching as the main source. In turn, we are to "teach others to obey all things I (Jesus) have taught you." 
 
Smellin Coffee said:
praise_yeshua said:
The Spirit of God is the "basis" for Christian morality.

I think it goes one layer deeper: the teachings of Jesus Christ. One of the things the Spirit was sent to do was "to bring to remembrance the things I (Jesus) have taught you".

So if the Spirit is being true, it seems logical to me that the Spirit's basis of morality points to Jesus' teaching as the main source. In turn, we are to "teach others to obey all things I (Jesus) have taught you."

Do you have everything that Jesus taught written down somewhere?

I have access to everything from God through His Divine Spirit. You can't find that "written down" in the tongues of man somewhere. I'm not throwing away anything... I'm just putting it into perspective. We talk about the things "written" as if they are ALL there is.......and its not. Not even close. The Spirit of God gives us access to EVERYTHING from God. Not just the little end of something......BIG....
 
praise_yeshua said:
By the way. You've haven't keep the 10 commandments and I dare say you don't keep them now.
Are you really that stupid or is this just a put on?

Where in my statement, "The first, the moral law, was fulfilled in Christ" did I say or even imply that I or anyone else keeps the moral law or is even capable of doing so?
 
Thomas Cassidy said:
praise_yeshua said:
By the way. You've haven't keep the 10 commandments and I dare say you don't keep them now.
Are you really that stupid or is this just a put on?

Where in my statement, "The first, the moral law, was fulfilled in Christ" did I say or even imply that I or anyone else keeps the moral law or is even capable of doing so?

Never said you did. I see no division in the Law of God. In fact, just think about what Jesus said about the "house divided".....

I'm just trying to understand, how you're seeing such divisions? You mentioned those laws written in stone by God's own hands and the extended law given by Moses. Please explain.
 
praise_yeshua said:
Smellin Coffee said:
praise_yeshua said:
The Spirit of God is the "basis" for Christian morality.

I think it goes one layer deeper: the teachings of Jesus Christ. One of the things the Spirit was sent to do was "to bring to remembrance the things I (Jesus) have taught you".

So if the Spirit is being true, it seems logical to me that the Spirit's basis of morality points to Jesus' teaching as the main source. In turn, we are to "teach others to obey all things I (Jesus) have taught you."

Do you have everything that Jesus taught written down somewhere?

I have access to everything from God through His Divine Spirit. You can't find that "written down" in the tongues of man somewhere. I'm not throwing away anything... I'm just putting it into perspective. We talk about the things "written" as if they are ALL there is.......and its not. Not even close. The Spirit of God gives us access to EVERYTHING from God. Not just the little end of something......BIG....

Was everything He taught recorded and passed down? Of course not. But anybody can take anything and (maybe even in all sincerity) apply the generic "the Spirit told me to" and it not be anything close to what Jesus taught.

I have a hard enough time trying to live what IS recorded for me to worry about anything else.

My point is that the basis of the Spirit's leading IS based on the earthly teachings of Christ. IMHO, of course.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
praise_yeshua said:
Smellin Coffee said:
praise_yeshua said:
The Spirit of God is the "basis" for Christian morality.

I think it goes one layer deeper: the teachings of Jesus Christ. One of the things the Spirit was sent to do was "to bring to remembrance the things I (Jesus) have taught you".

So if the Spirit is being true, it seems logical to me that the Spirit's basis of morality points to Jesus' teaching as the main source. In turn, we are to "teach others to obey all things I (Jesus) have taught you."

Do you have everything that Jesus taught written down somewhere?

I have access to everything from God through His Divine Spirit. You can't find that "written down" in the tongues of man somewhere. I'm not throwing away anything... I'm just putting it into perspective. We talk about the things "written" as if they are ALL there is.......and its not. Not even close. The Spirit of God gives us access to EVERYTHING from God. Not just the little end of something......BIG....

Was everything He taught recorded and passed down? Of course not. But anybody can take anything and (maybe even in all sincerity) apply the generic "the Spirit told me to" and it not be anything close to what Jesus taught.

I have a hard enough time trying to live what IS recorded for me to worry about anything else.

My point is that the basis of the Spirit's leading IS based on the earthly teachings of Christ. IMHO, of course.

I think God likes more control on a person's daily life than what you're seeing. It seems most people like to take this attitude you're describing. Not trying to be kick it or make you mad....

It seems you think that a person can pretty much do what they want each day as long as they are following the teachings recorded from Jesus?

I seem to think its more complicated than that. That God actually desires to direct our individual steps. Don't get me wrong. I'm not talking about being a zombie for Jesus. I'm talking about actually knowing each step to take and that it will be pleasing to God.

Example, How do you determine a "word fitly spoken"? Do you just think of something that might fit and blurt it out? Or do you believe that the Spirit of God, "itself", can lead in the proper path to choose?

Just how do you get this from what is written?

By the way, I'm not saying a person can do ANYTHING and claim God's leadership. Hilary..... has tried to do that too much already.
 
praise_yeshua said:
Smellin Coffee said:
praise_yeshua said:
Smellin Coffee said:
praise_yeshua said:
The Spirit of God is the "basis" for Christian morality.

I think it goes one layer deeper: the teachings of Jesus Christ. One of the things the Spirit was sent to do was "to bring to remembrance the things I (Jesus) have taught you".

So if the Spirit is being true, it seems logical to me that the Spirit's basis of morality points to Jesus' teaching as the main source. In turn, we are to "teach others to obey all things I (Jesus) have taught you."

Do you have everything that Jesus taught written down somewhere?

I have access to everything from God through His Divine Spirit. You can't find that "written down" in the tongues of man somewhere. I'm not throwing away anything... I'm just putting it into perspective. We talk about the things "written" as if they are ALL there is.......and its not. Not even close. The Spirit of God gives us access to EVERYTHING from God. Not just the little end of something......BIG....

Was everything He taught recorded and passed down? Of course not. But anybody can take anything and (maybe even in all sincerity) apply the generic "the Spirit told me to" and it not be anything close to what Jesus taught.

I have a hard enough time trying to live what IS recorded for me to worry about anything else.

My point is that the basis of the Spirit's leading IS based on the earthly teachings of Christ. IMHO, of course.

I think God likes more control on a person's daily life than what you're seeing. It seems most people like to take this attitude you're describing. Not trying to be kick it or make you mad....

It seems you think that a person can pretty much do what they want each day as long as they are following the teachings recorded from Jesus?

I seem to think its more complicated than that. That God actually desires to direct our individual steps. Don't get me wrong. I'm not talking about being a zombie for Jesus. I'm talking about actually knowing each step to take and that it will be pleasing to God.

Example, How do you determine a "word fitly spoken"? Do you just think of something that might fit and blurt it out? Or do you believe that the Spirit of God, "itself", can lead in the proper path to choose?

Just how do you get this from what is written?

By the way, I'm not saying a person can do ANYTHING and claim God's leadership. Hilary..... has tried to do that too much already.

How does one "love his neighbor as himself" lead one to "obeying a couple of things and doing whatever one wants"? Being poor in spirit, living with meekness, being forgiving, humble, loving and merciful, loving God, hungering for righteousness and justice, etc., how is that NOT being in a path which would lead apart from God?

And a word aptly spoken, couldn't it be applied in a principle of "loving one's neighbor"? If our words are geared to build up one another in love, even if the words themselves come out wrong, the heart is right.

Does the Spirit lead OUTSIDE the teachings of Jesus? (Slain in the Spirit, public faith healing, tongues, etc.) If so, where is the line of demarcation? How does one discern between the Spirit and say, one's personal moral conscience?
 
TheVoice said:
This is true but the Bible reveals to us the nature of God. God is Love. God is Life. He  also gave us commands like do not kill, love your enemy. These commands (and many others)  help us follow the nature of God.

The commands help us know the nature of God.  The Spirit helps us follow the nature of God.  I don't know about you, but I do not need to know that God said "do not murder" in order to be motivated not to murder. 

Some people (not necessarily you) think this comes down to two options:  Know and follow laws, or do whatever is right in your own mind.  Both of these options ignore the Spirit.  When you are walking in the Spirit, you are doing what is right in the mind of the Spirit, not what's right in your own mind.  And if you don't have the Spirit, well, I guess you need laws to tell you what to do, not that it will do you any good. 

Do people use that as an excuse to sin?  Sure.  So do they use the law (or picking and choosing among the laws) as an excuse to sin.  That's a spiritual problem, not a legal one.

 
praise_yeshua said:
Just where did you read "God is love"...... in the Law given by Moses? Please share.....

Isiah 43:4-5;Duet 7:6-8, Proverbs 3:11-13, Zephaniah 316-18 all talk about different manners in which God loves. Note I never said the OT says God is love but that the law show us the nature of God is love.

By the way, the Law given to Moses said "an eye for an eye". Not to love your enemies. Jesus witnessed to this Matthew 5.

Did not Jesus then give us a law to love our enemies in Matthew 5? All the references about law you have quoted to me were from the epistles therefore they would abolish even Jesus' law.

Are you saying the Spirit of God doesn't impart knowledge?..... What a "revelation".

How does the spirit impart Knowledge though? Through his WORD! Not through personal revelations (2 Peter 1:20)

Just what does these verses mean to you?
Rom 8:2  For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
Rom 8:3  For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

They mean without the righteousness of Christ I am damned to Hell. The law can never make me righteous enough to go to heaven. This does not mean that once I am save I should say "Oh well I can't keep 100% of the law so lets just not even try to do right".

Do you realize that death reigned from Adam to Moses? Even upon those who didn't sin after the transgression of Adam himself?

LOL. Did you just claim that there were perfect people after Adam?

Bunny trail? I didn't know you where the one defining the "trail" this discussion should follow!!!!

I asked a simple question about whether Christian's suffer consequences when they sin and you talked about freedom from judgment before God and death and never answered the question.

P.S. - I answered your question about sin, why do you shy away from mine?

This is getting juicy.... So... Sanctification comes by keeping the "Law of God"? Be specific. Don't talk around it.....

Sanctification has diverse meanings in Christianity. Am I set apart unto Salvation once and for all eternity - Yes. Am I set apart from the commandments of Christ and the prophets by grace - No. Christ said "If you love me keep my commandments."

As a Christian, do you have fellowship with God when you sin? Notice I said "when you sin". Don't pretend you've ceased sinning.

No. I still have a relationship, but fellowship is dead [John 9:31,1 Peter 3:12] Fellowship is resumed when we confess our sins [1 John 1:9]

Don't misapply Romans 7:8. Paul was speaking of himself. Not the order or revelation in the giving of the Law of God.

Ok I got it. God put this in the Bible because it only applied to Paul. Of course it doesn't apply to the disciples, Paul was trying to teach. How silly of me to think God wrote the Scriptures for me.
Sarcasim^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Do you have any evidence that this is only applicable to Paul?

Get a grip man.... Don't twist what I said. The imputation of Righteousness upon man didn't come about until the imputation of sin upon the Lord Jesus Christ. It wasn't HIS sin. IT was OUR sin that He bore in His own body on the tree. The RIGHTEOUS for the UNRIGHTEOUS. This the very core of what is witnessed in the verses I quoted.

I'm not twisting anything. Just point out the very real fact that these verse refer to the act of salvation and say nothing about the law being abolished.

This is a good question. The simple answer is in my flesh I can only sin. In the spirit I can only do right. Every day we are bombarded with temptation to sin and must chose to yield to the spirit or the flesh. This struggle is best summed up by Paul in Romans 7:15-25. From TheVoice

Man.... we go through all of this for you say you can only do right through the Spirit..... you must agree with me then? If you can only do right through the Spirit, then why are you talking about a law that you can only serve through the FLESH?

The law is not fleshly!

Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.


The Law gives us the knowledge of right and wrong. And the spirit gives us the strength to chose right over wrong.

A simple example that may better distinguish my viewpoint.

A new Christian is saved. As he reads the Bible it burns a desires in him to witness. He may read the Great commission (another one of Jesus' commands). As he studies he will obtain knowledge on how to witness. It may lead him to Jesus and the women at the well. It may lead him to Nicodeamus. It may simply lead him to John 3:16. In this way yes every Christian will have a different experience but knowledge will lead the Christian to obedience.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
How does one "love his neighbor as himself" lead one to "obeying a couple of things and doing whatever one wants"? Being poor in spirit, living with meekness, being forgiving, humble, loving and merciful, loving God, hungering for righteousness and justice, etc., how is that NOT being in a path which would lead apart from God?

You misunderstand me...... let me come at it from a different direction.

You have to admit there are things to "choose from" in following the example of Christ. In one instance, Christ told his disciples to not take anything on their journey to villages and teaching the people. In another instance, Christ told these same disciples to take food and money with them.

Following these examples, just how would you know when to follow which example? They had Christ with them to personally lead them in the decision. We have the Spirit of God. There are many other examples but lets just go with this one first.

And a word aptly spoken, couldn't it be applied in a principle of "loving one's neighbor"? If our words are geared to build up one another in love, even if the words themselves come out wrong, the heart is right.

Its not just about when to say something. Its about what to say. Of all the words of encourage our Lord gave..... how do you know which one to choose? Blind luck? an arbitrary choice?
Does the Spirit lead OUTSIDE the teachings of Jesus? (Slain in the Spirit, public faith healing, tongues, etc.) If so, where is the line of demarcation? How does one discern between the Spirit and say, one's personal moral conscience?

I'd say we have to leave many things up to personal convictions. However, no one could say..... "murder" someone and then claim God lead them to do it.....and true healing is rather self evident.

I heard a preacher the other day talking about a man who was preaching that God didn't want ANYONE in Christ to suffer in any way. That there was absolute healing for every Child of God.....no one had to suffer any infirmities. This same man was wearing glasses.... as he was preaching this message...... I'm think that same man would probably say that was his one "torn in the flesh". :)

 
TheVoice said:
Isiah 43:4-5;Duet 7:6-8, Proverbs 3:11-13, Zephaniah 316-18 all talk about different manners in which God loves. Note I never said the OT says God is love but that the law show us the nature of God is love.

It one thing to say God loves.... its another to say that God is love. Do you really not know the difference?

Did not Jesus then give us a law to love our enemies in Matthew 5? All the references about law you have quoted to me were from the epistles therefore they would abolish even Jesus' law.

What in the world are you talking about? I'm not a hyper dispensationalist. Don't even think like one. You're requiring I submit to your own theology when you say such things....

How does the spirit impart Knowledge though? Through his WORD! Not through personal revelations (2 Peter 1:20)

Are you talking about the Spirit of God or some other "spirit"?

Joh 16:13  Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth:

Do you remember when Jesus said that a man shall live by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God? Do you really believe that we have EVERY word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God..... "WRITTEN".... somewhere?
They mean without the righteousness of Christ I am damned to Hell. The law can never make me righteous enough to go to heaven. This does not mean that once I am save I should say "Oh well I can't keep 100% of the law so lets just not even try to do right".

Humm.... Just how much of the "Law of God" are you keeping? Do the "tryer of the law" get justification or is the "doers of the law"???? :)

LOL. Did you just claim that there were perfect people after Adam?

No. You just didn't get my reference. Read again. Hint, its in the book of Romans. Its an important part of understanding Paul's theology. Its an logical argument for death existing before the Law of God being given to Moses.

I asked a simple question about whether Christian's suffer consequences when they sin and you talked about freedom from judgment before God and death and never answered the question.

P.S. - I answered your question about sin, why do you shy away from mine?


I didn't shy away from it. You just didn't understand my answer. Yes. Christian suffer consequence when they sin. I will also add that Christian suffer when they don't sin. When they are in absolute obedience to Christ..... they still SUFFER. If you get this.... you might just get what I said to start with.
Sanctification has diverse meanings in Christianity. Am I set apart unto Salvation once and for all eternity - Yes. Am I set apart from the commandments of Christ and the prophets by grace - No. Christ said "If you love me keep my commandments."

I hope you realize that Jesus talked of "new commandments". Does that mean there is something MORE than what the Law of God gave to Moses....How does this affect "sanctification" through obedience to the Law of Moses?

No. I still have a relationship, but fellowship is dead [John 9:31,1 Peter 3:12] Fellowship is resumed when we confess our sins [1 John 1:9]

Humm.... so you're no longer treated like a son by the Father? Really? By what means do you have access to God once you sin after being Saved? Isn't it about "relationship"?

Question.... Does the conviction of the Spirit of God in His sons.....imply "fellowship" with God?

Ok I got it. God put this in the Bible because it only applied to Paul. Of course it doesn't apply to the disciples, Paul was trying to teach. How silly of me to think God wrote the Scriptures for me.
Sarcasim^^^^^^^^^^^^^

No. But it must have logical order to have a proper application. You're removing such to "suit" your needs.
I'm not twisting anything. Just point out the very real fact that these verse refer to the act of salvation and say nothing about the law being abolished.

I never used the word "abolish". Never would. I will use the word "establish".

The law is not fleshly!

I posted a quote from Romans 8:3. I'll do it again and make the applicable part.... really BIG...

Rom 8:3  For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh

The Law gives us the knowledge of right and wrong. And the spirit gives us the strength to chose right over wrong.

It does? Even the part in the Law that talked about an "eye for an eye"? I seem to remember Jesus saying something about that part?

A simple example that may better distinguish my viewpoint.

A new Christian is saved. As he reads the Bible it burns a desires in him to witness. He may read the Great commission (another one of Jesus' commands). As he studies he will obtain knowledge on how to witness. It may lead him to Jesus and the women at the well. It may lead him to Nicodeamus. It may simply lead him to John 3:16. In this way yes every Christian will have a different experience but knowledge will lead the Christian to obedience.

I hope you give more credence to following the Spirit of God. Without the Spirit of God, you'll never differentiate between yourself and the apostles of old. Whether you believe in this or not.... I'm not trying to be an apostle. Not trying to be Nicodeamus. Just trying to be who I am in Christ Jesus. God's Spirit has a perfect eye on how to accomplish that in me. Reading the Scriptures will only get you part of the way there. I don't want to be one of those people who are "ever learning" and never getting anywhere.
 
The Law is obeyed with the flesh.

Gal 3:2-3
2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?

"The flesh" in v. 3 hear refers to the "works of the law" in verse 2.
 
You have to admit there are things to "choose from" in following the example of Christ. In one instance, Christ told his disciples to not take anything on their journey to villages and teaching the people. In another instance, Christ told these same disciples to take food and money with them.

How does that pair of choices negate what I said?

My point is that the basis of the Spirit's leading IS based on the earthly teachings of Christ. IMHO, of course.

Following these examples, just how would you know when to follow which example? They had Christ with them to personally lead them in the decision. We have the Spirit of God. There are many other examples but lets just go with this one first.

So you are suggesting that in following either one of these choices based on Christ's teaching is the wrong choice? Or can God already know what you will choose and will work around that, being that one's motive is in the right place in following Jesus?

Its not just about when to say something. Its about what to say. Of all the words of encourage our Lord gave..... how do you know which one to choose? Blind luck? an arbitrary choice?

So how does one KNOW the words he speaks "on behalf of the Spirit's leading" is from the Spirit and what is his own cognitive vocabulary? How can one prove one way or the other? Like Kierkegaard said,

Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.

I'd say we have to leave many things up to personal convictions. However, no one could say..... "murder" someone and then claim God lead them to do it.....and true healing is rather self evident.

Precisely. Jesus even said that there would be those that kill others in belief they are doing God's bidding yet they are not. I do believe in healing and that it can be miraculously from God. I just deny that it is done on a public platform in front of a group of people who are fawning over their "healing" pastor because he is "filled with the Spirit". :)
 
TheVoice said:
How does the spirit impart Knowledge though? Through his WORD! Not through personal revelations (2 Peter 1:20)

Unrelated to this thread but your words here make me want to ask a question. Does the Holy Spirit have any active role in a believer's life outside of illuminating scripture? For instance, does He prompt thoughts or actions as we go about our daily activities?
 
FWIW my wife wears pants and has short hair.  :D
 
Back
Top