If you're turning your duck loose in an aviary and chasing it around inflicting multiple injuries until it's too weak and tired out to fly and you can drive a skewer through its heart, I would call that cruel.Question: do you believe duck hunting and fishing are also animal cruelty?
I think killing for sport is problematic at best. Not because of any cruelty, but because it seems to be more about a desire to kill than it is a freezer full of venison.
No. No. No. It's about the thrill of the hunt. blah blah blah
What if instead of a rifle your instrument were a camera?And I can find no justification whatever for so-called 'big game' hunting.
I don't think Nimrod hunted for sport, but if he did I don't think he was called a mighty hunter before the Lord because he took his game from a distance with precision artillery. Now if someone shows me the thirty-point buck he took just with his wits and a k-bar, I would be impressed.
It's my opinion that Nimrod was hunter like that of Beowulf--someone who was contracted to kill beasts that posed a threat to the safety of a community and that were too mighty for the average man.