D
Dr. Huk-N-Duck
Guest

During the Civil War, Gen. Ulysses Grant Began Expelling Southern Jews—Until Lincoln Stepped In | HISTORY
General Orders No. 11 gave Jewish people just 24 hours to leave their homes and lives behind.

Very sad commentary on General Grants legacy.![]()
During the Civil War, Gen. Ulysses Grant Began Expelling Southern Jews—Until Lincoln Stepped In | HISTORY
General Orders No. 11 gave Jewish people just 24 hours to leave their homes and lives behind.www.history.com
Right. I am a U.S. Grant historian of sorts. I have read 4 books on him and have his Autobiography. That story was about Jewish men (the article says they were not all Jews, but the truth is, almost all of the ones around Vicksburg were) smuggling cotton right before and during the siege of Vicksburg. from the article:![]()
During the Civil War, Gen. Ulysses Grant Began Expelling Southern Jews—Until Lincoln Stepped In | HISTORY
General Orders No. 11 gave Jewish people just 24 hours to leave their homes and lives behind.www.history.com
That is a true quote. People said Grant was a drunk because in his former life as a Quartermaster in Oregon he had been apart from his family for a year an started drinking. There was nothing to do there, and he was discovered to be drunk once by a superior. Thereafter he was always known as a drunk. Halleck sent a well known journalist to follow Grant for months and report back. The man told Lincoln and Halleck, "Grant does not drink any more or less than any other soldier." He was not a drunk.The way I heard it, Lincoln had trouble keeping competent generals. The one consistent and competent general he had was Grant. He was a thorn in everyone's side but Lincoln kept relying on him. When asked why, Lincoln replied, "Because he fights."
To my shock, almost every deed stated the property could not be sold to blacks or to Jews. Of course, it was our job to change that,
Yes and no. Technically, more like the 1940s in which the SC ruled such practices unconstitutional. However, such restrictions can still be abided by if done so voluntarily, which I suppose really means nothing unless a minority citizen just is so offended by such a rule that they just voluntarily refuse to buy with such a restriction on their deed. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/334/1/Weren't covenants like that unenforceable by the 80s?