Stop Trump!!!

[subllibrm]

Christian Patriots!

The useful idiots of the American capitalist system.  8)

I don't understand what your problem is with loving the country in which you live and rear your children and grandchildren.
For instance, I don't understand why, in your thought process, I cannot put Christ and His kingdom first and at the same time, be alert as to what is going on with the government of the country in which God has placed me in my journey.

Is it sinful for me to be politically active?
Is it sinful for me to speak out and stand up against the killing of the unborn?
Since it is a political problem, is it a sin for me to work within the political process to fight the funding of slaughtering the innocents?

I don't understand why you cannot separate your loyalties...putting Christ and His kingdom first while being a good citizen of the country in which you live. by that, I mean knowing what is happening in the political process because it does affect the quality of life that you and your family experience. I am under no illusion that America or any other country should be a theocracy...but I believe in the principle of sowing and reaping.

Why don't you?
And, why do you care that I do?

Point missed completely.

 

[Bruh]

Trump / Carson Ticket!

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Christian Patriots!

The useful idiots of the American capitalist system.  8)

I don't understand what your problem is with loving the country in which you live and rear your children and grandchildren.
For instance, I don't understand why, in your thought process, I cannot put Christ and His kingdom first and at the same time, be alert as to what is going on with the government of the country in which God has placed me in my journey.

Is it sinful for me to be politically active?
Is it sinful for me to speak out and stand up against the killing of the unborn?
Since it is a political problem, is it a sin for me to work within the political process to fight the funding of slaughtering the innocents?

I don't understand why you cannot separate your loyalties...putting Christ and His kingdom first while being a good citizen of the country in which you live. by that, I mean knowing what is happening in the political process because it does affect the quality of life that you and your family experience. I am under no illusion that America or any other country should be a theocracy...but I believe in the principle of sowing and reaping.

Why don't you?
And, why do you care that I do?

Point missed completely.

Perhaps you have failed to make or explain your point.
You argue against the stereotype that you seem to see everywhere...that Christians who are patriotic...or who are politically active are trying to bring in a Political kingdom. In my experience, that is a very small group of people and their number is shrinking almost by the day.

I ask, do you believe it is wrong for a Christian to be politically active, or civic minded, which to me often go hand in hand.

 

[subllibrm]

I ask, do you believe it is wrong for a Christian to be politically active, or civic minded, which to me often go hand in hand.

Not at all.

It is wrong for Christians to put their trust in political solutions to spiritual problems. It is wrong from Christians to make political agreement a measure of spirituality or a condition of fellowship. It is wrong for Christians to degrade, debase and insult the brethren over governing policies.

For example it is wrong when someone makes a point regarding corporate welfare and they are lambasted for being soft on abortion. The idea that we must hold our tongue  on issues of taxation or market policies because it provides aid and comfort to the democrats on the social issues.

The idea that all of these things are black and white and require lockstep conformity by good Christians is not only un-biblical it is un-American. It was pointed out by someone else that Christians should have spoken up against Hitler and his machinations. While I am not suggesting that there is any Hitler level of evil at hand I find it ironic that it is Christians telling me not to question the great and awesome GOP.

Illegal immigrants demonized while the companies that lure them here with work are given a pass because "what's good for business is good for America". Small family companies used as shills to sell policies that benefit the giant multinationals. In fact, it is usually the big boys setting the policies that kill their smaller competition.

Wall to wall slamming of ObamaCare while conveniently ignoring the fact that big corporations want it more than anyone. "If you like it you can keep it" is the loophole they business is using to degrade insurance plans to the point no one "likes" their plan. And then they will blame it on Obama. The very reason the GOP has not put one bill on the table for Obama to veto. They want to be against it while at the same time making sure it stays put.

As a follower of Christ I do not want to be named as a fellow traveler with the train wreck known as the Palin family. Spouting off about family values and patriotism while they keep breeding more illegitimate children. Guys like Newt and Rush speaking for traditional marriage. And Christians telling me that I shouldn't point out their hypocrisy because we need to fight abortion. Talk about cognitive dissonance.

So I point out the flies in the ointment, ask questions and get accused of being anti-American and have my faith questioned. So much for that open marketplace of ideas I have heard so much about.

 

[Just John]

"Funny" aside....what about that CNN poll? 

"Carlson" dropped some too.

CNN poll is probably off. NBC poll has him at 29 percent.

But of course.

When I look at polls I always go to the RealClearPolitics averages. I haven't yet heard anyone accuse them of being "establishment".

It would appear Trump has slipped some while others have risen.

 

[Just John]

.

 

[praise_yeshua]

"Funny" aside....what about that CNN poll? 

"Carlson" dropped some too.

CNN poll is probably off. NBC poll has him at 29 percent.

But of course.

When I look at polls I always go to the RealClearPolitics averages. I haven't yet heard anyone accuse them of being "establishment".

It would appear Trump has slipped some while others have risen.

I can't see the photo on my phone but the average appears to be 28.5 percent. I mentioned 29 percent. This is well within the margin of error that Trump has been polling. You just can't win with a Trump hater....

 

[Just John]

"Funny" aside....what about that CNN poll? 

"Carlson" dropped some too.

CNN poll is probably off. NBC poll has him at 29 percent.

But of course.

When I look at polls I always go to the RealClearPolitics averages. I haven't yet heard anyone accuse them of being "establishment".

It would appear Trump has slipped some while others have risen.

I can't see the photo on my phone but the average appears to be 28.5 percent. I mentioned 29 percent. This is well within the margin of error that Trump has been polling. You just can't win with a Trump hater....

But there is always at least hope in educating low-information voters.  

In polls you look for trends. There are two in play here:

One is the polling number for Trump. You will note a high of 33% in the ABC/Washington Post poll during  9/7  and 9/10.  The ensuing polls go to 27 then 24 which of course you get the average of 28.5.  Look at the CNN poll during 9-4 to 9-8 and the CNN poll 10 days later. Trump goes from 32% to 24%  and "Carlson" goes from  19% to 14%.  On the other hand Fiorina goes from 3% to 15% during the same time and Rubio goes from 3% to 11%.

The other trend is the spread. You can see that Trump was at a high on the Quinnipiac poll 8/20 to 8/25 with a +16 spread. That drops to a +9 on the 9/17 to 9/19  poll.

Are these 100% representative? I don't know but they tell a trend in progress.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

I ask, do you believe it is wrong for a Christian to be politically active, or civic minded, which to me often go hand in hand.

Not at all.

It is wrong for Christians to put their trust in political solutions to spiritual problems. It is wrong from Christians to make political agreement a measure of spirituality or a condition of fellowship. It is wrong for Christians to degrade, debase and insult the brethren over governing policies.

For example it is wrong when someone makes a point regarding corporate welfare and they are lambasted for being soft on abortion. The idea that we must hold our tongue  on issues of taxation or market policies because it provides aid and comfort to the democrats on the social issues.

The idea that all of these things are black and white and require lockstep conformity by good Christians is not only un-biblical it is un-American. It was pointed out by someone else that Christians should have spoken up against Hitler and his machinations. While I am not suggesting that there is any Hitler level of evil at hand I find it ironic that it is Christians telling me not to question the great and awesome GOP.

Illegal immigrants demonized while the companies that lure them here with work are given a pass because "what's good for business is good for America". Small family companies used as shills to sell policies that benefit the giant multinationals. In fact, it is usually the big boys setting the policies that kill their smaller competition.

Wall to wall slamming of ObamaCare while conveniently ignoring the fact that big corporations want it more than anyone. "If you like it you can keep it" is the loophole they business is using to degrade insurance plans to the point no one "likes" their plan. And then they will blame it on Obama. The very reason the GOP has not put one bill on the table for Obama to veto. They want to be against it while at the same time making sure it stays put.

As a follower of Christ I do not want to be named as a fellow traveler with the train wreck known as the Palin family. Spouting off about family values and patriotism while they keep breeding more illegitimate children. Guys like Newt and Rush speaking for traditional marriage. And Christians telling me that I shouldn't point out their hypocrisy because we need to fight abortion. Talk about cognitive dissonance.

So I point out the flies in the ointment, ask questions and get accused of being anti-American and have my faith questioned. So much for that open marketplace of ideas I have heard so much about.

It seems to me that you argue against figment of someone's steretypical imagination...which are liberal Democrat talking points to demean evangelical Chritians who dare to be politically active.

And, I have pointed out before instances that you misrepresent Rush's stance and you do so again in this post. Again, you seem to argue against steretypical opinions made by the enemies of those you criticize.

As to hypocrisy, I see you use the tactics to hate on the people you demean....the train wrecks! You have learned well from the liberals....

 

[rsc2a]

It seems to me that you argue against figment of someone's steretypical imagination...

*blink*

 

[subllibrm]

I ask, do you believe it is wrong for a Christian to be politically active, or civic minded, which to me often go hand in hand.

Not at all.

It is wrong for Christians to put their trust in political solutions to spiritual problems. It is wrong from Christians to make political agreement a measure of spirituality or a condition of fellowship. It is wrong for Christians to degrade, debase and insult the brethren over governing policies.

For example it is wrong when someone makes a point regarding corporate welfare and they are lambasted for being soft on abortion. The idea that we must hold our tongue  on issues of taxation or market policies because it provides aid and comfort to the democrats on the social issues.

The idea that all of these things are black and white and require lockstep conformity by good Christians is not only un-biblical it is un-American. It was pointed out by someone else that Christians should have spoken up against Hitler and his machinations. While I am not suggesting that there is any Hitler level of evil at hand I find it ironic that it is Christians telling me not to question the great and awesome GOP.

Illegal immigrants demonized while the companies that lure them here with work are given a pass because "what's good for business is good for America". Small family companies used as shills to sell policies that benefit the giant multinationals. In fact, it is usually the big boys setting the policies that kill their smaller competition.

Wall to wall slamming of ObamaCare while conveniently ignoring the fact that big corporations want it more than anyone. "If you like it you can keep it" is the loophole they business is using to degrade insurance plans to the point no one "likes" their plan. And then they will blame it on Obama. The very reason the GOP has not put one bill on the table for Obama to veto. They want to be against it while at the same time making sure it stays put.

As a follower of Christ I do not want to be named as a fellow traveler with the train wreck known as the Palin family. Spouting off about family values and patriotism while they keep breeding more illegitimate children. Guys like Newt and Rush speaking for traditional marriage. And Christians telling me that I shouldn't point out their hypocrisy because we need to fight abortion. Talk about cognitive dissonance.

So I point out the flies in the ointment, ask questions and get accused of being anti-American and have my faith questioned. So much for that open marketplace of ideas I have heard so much about.

It seems to me that you argue against figment of someone's steretypical imagination...which are liberal Democrat talking points to demean evangelical Chritians who dare to be politically active.

And, I have pointed out before instances that you misrepresent Rush's stance and you do so again in this post. Again, you seem to argue against steretypical opinions made by the enemies of those you criticize.

As to hypocrisy, I see you use the tactics to hate on the people you demean....the train wrecks! You have learned well from the liberals....

I guess I have been refudiated! 

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

I ask, do you believe it is wrong for a Christian to be politically active, or civic minded, which to me often go hand in hand.

Not at all.

It is wrong for Christians to put their trust in political solutions to spiritual problems. It is wrong from Christians to make political agreement a measure of spirituality or a condition of fellowship. It is wrong for Christians to degrade, debase and insult the brethren over governing policies.

For example it is wrong when someone makes a point regarding corporate welfare and they are lambasted for being soft on abortion. The idea that we must hold our tongue  on issues of taxation or market policies because it provides aid and comfort to the democrats on the social issues.

The idea that all of these things are black and white and require lockstep conformity by good Christians is not only un-biblical it is un-American. It was pointed out by someone else that Christians should have spoken up against Hitler and his machinations. While I am not suggesting that there is any Hitler level of evil at hand I find it ironic that it is Christians telling me not to question the great and awesome GOP.

Illegal immigrants demonized while the companies that lure them here with work are given a pass because "what's good for business is good for America". Small family companies used as shills to sell policies that benefit the giant multinationals. In fact, it is usually the big boys setting the policies that kill their smaller competition.

Wall to wall slamming of ObamaCare while conveniently ignoring the fact that big corporations want it more than anyone. "If you like it you can keep it" is the loophole they business is using to degrade insurance plans to the point no one "likes" their plan. And then they will blame it on Obama. The very reason the GOP has not put one bill on the table for Obama to veto. They want to be against it while at the same time making sure it stays put.

As a follower of Christ I do not want to be named as a fellow traveler with the train wreck known as the Palin family. Spouting off about family values and patriotism while they keep breeding more illegitimate children. Guys like Newt and Rush speaking for traditional marriage. And Christians telling me that I shouldn't point out their hypocrisy because we need to fight abortion. Talk about cognitive dissonance.

So I point out the flies in the ointment, ask questions and get accused of being anti-American and have my faith questioned. So much for that open marketplace of ideas I have heard so much about.

It seems to me that you argue against figment of someone's steretypical imagination...which are liberal Democrat talking points to demean evangelical Chritians who dare to be politically active.

And, I have pointed out before instances that you misrepresent Rush's stance and you do so again in this post. Again, you seem to argue against steretypical opinions made by the enemies of those you criticize.

As to hypocrisy, I see you use the tactics to hate on the people you demean....the train wrecks! You have learned well from the liberals....

I guess I have been refudiated! 

Personally, I think so....

 

[subllibrm]

I ask, do you believe it is wrong for a Christian to be politically active, or civic minded, which to me often go hand in hand.

Not at all.

It is wrong for Christians to put their trust in political solutions to spiritual problems. It is wrong from Christians to make political agreement a measure of spirituality or a condition of fellowship. It is wrong for Christians to degrade, debase and insult the brethren over governing policies.

For example it is wrong when someone makes a point regarding corporate welfare and they are lambasted for being soft on abortion. The idea that we must hold our tongue  on issues of taxation or market policies because it provides aid and comfort to the democrats on the social issues.

The idea that all of these things are black and white and require lockstep conformity by good Christians is not only un-biblical it is un-American. It was pointed out by someone else that Christians should have spoken up against Hitler and his machinations. While I am not suggesting that there is any Hitler level of evil at hand I find it ironic that it is Christians telling me not to question the great and awesome GOP.

Illegal immigrants demonized while the companies that lure them here with work are given a pass because "what's good for business is good for America". Small family companies used as shills to sell policies that benefit the giant multinationals. In fact, it is usually the big boys setting the policies that kill their smaller competition.

Wall to wall slamming of ObamaCare while conveniently ignoring the fact that big corporations want it more than anyone. "If you like it you can keep it" is the loophole they business is using to degrade insurance plans to the point no one "likes" their plan. And then they will blame it on Obama. The very reason the GOP has not put one bill on the table for Obama to veto. They want to be against it while at the same time making sure it stays put.

As a follower of Christ I do not want to be named as a fellow traveler with the train wreck known as the Palin family. Spouting off about family values and patriotism while they keep breeding more illegitimate children. Guys like Newt and Rush speaking for traditional marriage. And Christians telling me that I shouldn't point out their hypocrisy because we need to fight abortion. Talk about cognitive dissonance.

So I point out the flies in the ointment, ask questions and get accused of being anti-American and have my faith questioned. So much for that open marketplace of ideas I have heard so much about.

It seems to me that you argue against figment of someone's steretypical imagination...which are liberal Democrat talking points to demean evangelical Chritians who dare to be politically active.

And, I have pointed out before instances that you misrepresent Rush's stance and you do so again in this post. Again, you seem to argue against steretypical opinions made by the enemies of those you criticize.

As to hypocrisy, I see you use the tactics to hate on the people you demean....the train wrecks! You have learned well from the liberals....

So ignore "alleged" hypocrisy of Newt, Rush and Sarah and take a shot at illegal immigration, tax policy, ObamaCare and big corporations vs. family businesses. Seems you skipped right over those in your rush to defend Rush.

With control of both houses of Congress, explain why there isn't a trash can full of vetoed Republican passed bills next to Obama's desk.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Sub:
So ignore "alleged" hypocrisy of Newt, Rush and Sarah and take a shot at illegal immigration, tax policy, ObamaCare and big corporations vs. family businesses. Seems you skipped right over those in your rush to defend Rush.

With control of both houses of Congress, explain why there isn't a trash can full of vetoed Republican passed bills next to Obama's desk.

What hypocrisy are you speaking of, specifically? I have never denied hypocrisy exists, but have pointed out, along with the Tomato, that Rush has been falsely accused a number of times. For instance, Rush weekly takes on the Chamber of Commerce and the Republican establishment over immigration (exploiting cheap labor) and corporate welfare.
And, if you'd watched yesterday's news, you would have seen that the democrats in the senate blocked a bill to defund Planned parenthood...the senate rules required 60 votes to send it to the president...something which frustrates the Republican base to no end.

 

[Just John]

"Funny" aside....what about that CNN poll? 

"Carlson" dropped some too.

CNN poll is probably off. NBC poll has him at 29 percent.

But of course.

When I look at polls I always go to the RealClearPolitics averages. I haven't yet heard anyone accuse them of being "establishment".

It would appear Trump has slipped some while others have risen.

I can't see the photo on my phone but the average appears to be 28.5 percent. I mentioned 29 percent. This is well within the margin of error that Trump has been polling. You just can't win with a Trump hater....

But there is always at least hope in educating low-information voters.  

In polls you look for trends. There are two in play here:

(snip)

1. The trend in polling numbers for the individual.

2. The trend in the spread between all candidates


Are these 100% representative? I don't know but they tell a trend in progress.

Both trends continue.

 

[Just John]

I love politics. I find it totally entertaining at times...like watching Leno's "man on the street interviews". At the risk of sounding  like Trump on his late night Twitter rants I just have to post some responses to a story in today's Business Insider. It regards Trump's  anger that some polls he views more favorably are not being promoted. These are truly entertaining. I'm posting some of my favorites but I promise 90% are similar(as of this writing).  Conspiratorial. Non-sequiturs. Poor logic.  Bad grammar. Low information, blind loyalty.

This one has to start it off...The guy starts off talking about "Volodya" Putin. 

Laurent_Frenet on Sep 24, 10:14 PM said:
@hypcocrites:
The good thing about Trump is he's a counter-puncher. If Putin does something bad to the U.S., Trump would smack him, immediately. Tit for tat. No pussyfooting around. No making nice. He'll treat Volodya the same way he treats Carly and Rubio and Jeb. If they are nice to him, he's nice to them. If they punch him, he punches back, immediately, and hard. It's high time the U.S. had such a president. Obama, to recall, when he and Michelle have a dispute, he always apologizes first-- by her public testimony (in a speech to schoolgirls). Can you imagine Hillary saying this about Bill? or Bill about Hillary? Or, for that matter, Barack about Michelle? Never.
After having an apologetic wimp for a president for 7 years, it's high time to have a garrulous counter-puncher at the top. High time.Yep, hate to have a president who might apologize to his wife first...especially as related by his wife in what must have been a serious policy speech to "schoolgirls".

Brad75287 on Sep 24, 10:05 PM said:  (edited for brevity)
The HP Lady (what ever her name is) is playing the game, she is not the outsider that she is said to be she has gone through the initiation for the Republicans in her race against Barbra Boxer.

Some have a point pointing out that Trump's Business experience isn't all he claims (who's could be ?) But no other candidate has that experience. (Including the fired HP CEO) Trump doesn't have the international affairs experience but neither does Rubio who does have the "book smarts" on the international playground but is about as tough as wet tissue.

Basically nobody is qualified to be president until they have done it for 8 years... and even then very few are.Yeah, Trump exaggerates his experience...no one could do what he claimed to have done, not even "that women from HP, whatever her name is".  But it doesn't matter because no president having ever run before has been qualified, unless you go back to the third and fourth terms of Roosevelt.

Cant Stump The Trump on Sep 24, 7:49 PM said:
Trump didn't get beat by no one in that last debate. He was holding court in there on those other wantabees. People tuned in for Trump, not to see Jeb, Marco and Carly.  Yep, didn't by no one!

b.mclane on Sep 24, 10:03 PM said:
@Cant Stump The Trump:
Trump new he was the fox at a fox hunt. His goal was to walk away unscathed. At one time there was 23 minutes he did not say a word.
The CNN debate was rigged.
1) 42% of questions about Trump!
3) Trojan Horse Carly admitted she rehearses her answers. Some articles suggest she got the questions via the GOPe so she seemed pretty slick but yet oddly automated in her answers.
4) 10 pit of 11 tickets were given to GOPe donors who we know wants Trump out of the race so they weren't a friendly crowd
6) moderator Hugh Hewitt admits to begging for the job. He got v3 questions in in 3 hours and his son just happens to work for the GOPeGOPe. Trump especially sounded intelligent those 23  minutes of not saying a word...about substantive foreign policy. But hey, at least he didn't "rehearse his answers" like Carly, or Reagan.


rick3262 on Sep 24, 11:13 PM said:
@b.mclane:
Exactly, and Trump still survived. This is exactly the type of person that we want to lead our country. Not some coward like Barack Obama who has the full backing of the MSN, who took his "Change That We Can Believe In" to mean the totality of his depth of knowledge regarding foreign and domestic policies. Not some tippytoer like Jeb Bush, who couldn't name an American woman that he'd put on the $10 bill.  Heck no,. No way I'd vote for a "tippytoer", pussy-footer who couldn't even think of a women  to put on the $10 bill! Trump said to put his daughter Ivanka on there. Brilliant!


Justin Spears on Sep 25, 12:23 AM said:
@Speak The Truth:
Don't think for 1 minute that the negative Trump comments are sincere. They are paid by George Soros to try to make the good people of the US to think that we are defeated so we give up and let them finish us off. Stay strong and stand up to the evil TROLLS. They know that there are few of them and many of us. They are shaking in their sandals that the American people see through their subterfuge. GO TRUMP - don't let the evil empire freak show stop you!  Soros is a lib and he is rich and supports Media Matters but he must also be somewhat of an organizational wizard to pay people to post negative comments on all of the Trump stories all over the web. "He get's things done"! People should consider a vote for him regardless of his beliefs. (At least he has some).


stacy4422 on Sep 24, 10:48 PM said:
@kathy vazquez:
Trump will get the votes! There are just to many of us pissed off with the yellow back Rino scum,
So dont worry Trump you got all of our votes and the black votes  Wow! Trump is going to break the 12% black vote ceiling for Republicans. He REALLY gets things done!


Linda Goodman on Sep 24, 9:42 PM said:
@CRRRR&7:
You missed the bigger issue - Power. With Trump in office, the whole game changes and corporate media is transformed from the powerful propaganda foundation of the NWO agenda [climate change climate change climate change.....] to.. what? I give up, What? The Newest Word Order agenda? 


Trump2016 on Sep 24, 9:46 PM said:
Trump need not lower himself to explain "establishment" polls...the working class Americans are with him regardless. Ha! The Donald explain himself? Trust him, it will be awesome and everyone will love it!

Ted West on Sep 24, 9:57 PM said:
@Trump2016:
Very true, but that's one big thing I like about Trump, he's one of us in spirit not above the fray. Remember Taxi, when Judd Hirsh told Ted Danson that he was a better man than Danson was? And along comes Danny deVito who says, "He may be better than you, but I ain't" as he dumps red gel an Danson's head? Okay, that was totally lost on me but I wasn't a Taxi watcher but is sounded really smart.


Willits on Sep 24, 10:46 PM said:
Who cares what any polls say? All I care about is what Trump says. I?m voting Trump whether he?s a Republican, an Independent, or even a Democrat. What he?s said already is good enough for me. Trump?s a guy who gets things done, he?s said what he wants done, and it sounds good to me. I?ve made up my mind. End of story for me. Trump 2016!  Here is another of our  "He gets things done so he must be right" persons. So did Mussolini.


Jared Spears on Sep 25, 12:10 AM said:
We know what the 1% establishment media is doing to Donald Trump. I hope that people stay strong against the attacks of the 1% establishment spider web trolls. They are paid to spend 100% of their time by George Soros and his ugly army of trolls to try to make us think that everyone is against Trump. If you say that you are against Trump now but you supported him before you are 100% TROLL. George Soros destroys countries. He is a Jew and he turned in Jews to the Nazis and sent them to DEATH CAMPS. He is a cold blooded monster vampire. We know what is going on! I know Soros is guilty of turning in other Jews to the Nazis but heck, he gets things done. And he must be paying well since his "spider web trolls" are part of the "1% Establishment".  Long hours but the pay is good.


RobNclt on Sep 25, 12:48 AM said:
In the very beginning I was leaning toward Carly but that didn't last long. I discovered there's nothing of substance in her. Her questions are rehearsed, she stands for anything that is women, and goes after Trump when she can. I unsubscribed from her daily emails and am 100% backing Donald Trump and so are my friends. I am amazed at the numbers of blacks, like myself, are backing Trump wholeheartedly.  Yeah, I don't like those candidates who "go after" others either. I like Trump instead. He doesn't prepare or "rehearse" but he's very substantive and has well thought out policies. And there he is getting that black vote again. Haven't you seen Diamond and Silk on YouTube?


http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-dishonest-poll-reporting-2015-9

 

[IFB X-Files]

 

[Bruh]

Just watched Trump on 60 minutes.  I so want this guy to be the next POTUS!!

 

[LongGone]

Sub:
So ignore "alleged" hypocrisy of Newt, Rush and Sarah and take a shot at illegal immigration, tax policy, ObamaCare and big corporations vs. family businesses. Seems you skipped right over those in your rush to defend Rush.

With control of both houses of Congress, explain why there isn't a trash can full of vetoed Republican passed bills next to Obama's desk.

What hypocrisy are you speaking of, specifically? I have never denied hypocrisy exists, but have pointed out, along with the Tomato, that Rush has been falsely accused a number of times. For instance, Rush weekly takes on the Chamber of Commerce and the Republican establishment over immigration (exploiting cheap labor) and corporate welfare.
And, if you'd watched yesterday's news, you would have seen that the democrats in the senate blocked a bill to defund Planned parenthood...the senate rules required 60 votes to send it to the president...something which frustrates the Republican base to no end.

Where are you getting 60 votes to pass a bill? The Senate needs 60 for veto but a majority to pass a bill.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Sub:
So ignore "alleged" hypocrisy of Newt, Rush and Sarah and take a shot at illegal immigration, tax policy, ObamaCare and big corporations vs. family businesses. Seems you skipped right over those in your rush to defend Rush.

With control of both houses of Congress, explain why there isn't a trash can full of vetoed Republican passed bills next to Obama's desk.

What hypocrisy are you speaking of, specifically? I have never denied hypocrisy exists, but have pointed out, along with the Tomato, that Rush has been falsely accused a number of times. For instance, Rush weekly takes on the Chamber of Commerce and the Republican establishment over immigration (exploiting cheap labor) and corporate welfare.
And, if you'd watched yesterday's news, you would have seen that the democrats in the senate blocked a bill to defund Planned parenthood...the senate rules required 60 votes to send it to the president...something which frustrates the Republican base to no end.

Where are you getting 60 votes to pass a bill? The Senate needs 60 for veto but a majority to pass a bill.

Its 2/3rds for a veto override. 60 votes is the votes needed to progress a bill past procedural hurdles.