Stop Trump!!!

[praise_yeshua]

The wealthy have more to give. I don't want anyone to have to give much of anything. However, so can afford it more than others.

Romney made a lot of poor Republicans mad. They didn't vote. He lost.

Well you have clearly proved yourself as someone who has no idea what a real conservative or liberal is. THAT is not a conservative tenant by any means.  I say again, low information voters.

The rest of your "specifics" were about as specific as Trump is on his great plans.

Typical establishment republican. When you lose. You claim to be smarter and more informed than others.

I'm a conservative and have always expected the rich to give more than the poor. Always. This isn't against conservative principles. Jesus said the same thing. Paul said the same thing. I don't think government should force people to give through taxation but if they do.... then the rich should be taxed more. I don't see how you can reject such a principle. In fact, I bet if you phrased the question this way..... every Republican in the primary would say the same thing. They support a graduated tax system. Even the flat tax is graduated with those buying more paying more.

Here. Let me show a small bit of intelligence. I can't say I originated it ...... I got it from Jesus.

From the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.

When a candidate or supposed "news anchor" asks leading, biased.... gotcha questions. They are speaking from their heart. They are liberal.... and it shows in their speech.

Another chink in your "conservative" veneer. Every  BELIEVER is under Biblical mandate to help the widows and orphans and the poor (though not lazy). And "to whom much is given, much is expected". But that doesn't mean the government is supposed to be the agent of the same. It's a fact that conservatives give more to charity then liberals. A real conservative desires the government to be smaller and more local.

And since you are talking about biblical example. God asked a tithe, ten percent, of all. He doesn't ask for thirty percent on those who make more.    I have been for a flat tax for 30 years since I first heard conservative candidate for senate seat from CA, Bruce Herschenson articulate it. (And what you describe is not a flat tax.) Not only is a real flat tax fair but one of the best points it allows people to really understand just how much they pay in taxes and realize how much an increase in spending will affect their taxes or the national debt.

You must not have read what I wrote. I said I wanted less monies overall taken for taxes. Smaller government. Those who much should pay more taxes than the poor. There is nothing u conservative about that position.

A flat income tax is unrealistic and a flat consumption tax is still a graduated tax. The rich I'll buy more and pay more. The poor will by less and pay less.

Are you really for a tax system where the ultra rich pay the same rate as the destitute? Really?

I haven't tithed in close to 25 years. I don't have a number in my head but I with Mater on the consumption tax with some relief for large ticket items such as cars.

You sound more like a Democrat on tax policy than anything else. Emotions defining policy rather than facts. 

Whether you have paid tithe in 25 years or not doesn't negate that God didn't seem to think the flat tithe was "unfair".  Picking fights that "some aren't paying "their fair share" is utter nonsense no matter if you say everyone should pay less. Many put nothing in, only pull out. Is that "fair"? 

A flat tax can work. And it will work to drive the size of government down and make it harder to raise taxes.

I can tell you know very little about the tithe.

Ever heard of the third and sixth year tithe? Did you know the Temple wasn't built on the tithe. Neither did the Kings draw a salary from the tithe.

You're full of nonsense.

 

[praise_yeshua]

 
? ?Trump wants to raise taxes on the hedge funds people?.
? ?They should!! (Regarding the rich paying their fair share).?
? ?I don't think the rich are hurting under Obama. Not even close. I think everyone should pay much less.

"I'm for taxing the hedge fund managers and increasing the capital gains on profits that exceed a certain amount. I think it's fair and I bet many people believe the same.? 

You think higher taxes will stop with hedge-fund managers?  LOL. Trump sure is playing a bunch of you.  He said he should be paying more and he's not a hedge-fund manager.

And who do you think should decide what a "fair share" is? Last year the top 1% paid 53% of taxes!!! The bottom 40% paid 4%. So I ask you, what is "fair"? The Dem's love to promote class envy and campaign against the rich because it plays to the less wealthy and buy's their votes. (They just typically never practice what they preach). But for every 757 jet and yacht Trum..., um, the rich buy the restaurants go to, the travel, etc., they provide jobs for people. Not to mention charity. Yes. trickle down economy does work! I'm by no means wealthy but at the same time I have zero jealousy for those who are.

My gross income put me in the top 10 percent last year. I paid my fair share.

The top 10 percents share of the tax burden has been falling slightly over the last 30 years. if I'm not mistaken, it was higher under Reagan.

Most all people think they paid THEIR "fair share". It's the OTHER person's "fair share" many worry about. 

When Reagan came into office the top rate was 70%. In 1985 it dropped to 28%. When Obama came into office it was 34%,. Now it's 39.6%

Such examples have always been deceptive. The 70 percent before Reagan wasn't the effective date. The effective rate has gradually declined over the last decade or so for the rich.

 

[Just John]

The wealthy have more to give. I don't want anyone to have to give much of anything. However, so can afford it more than others.

Romney made a lot of poor Republicans mad. They didn't vote. He lost.

Well you have clearly proved yourself as someone who has no idea what a real conservative or liberal is. THAT is not a conservative tenant by any means.  I say again, low information voters.

The rest of your "specifics" were about as specific as Trump is on his great plans.

Typical establishment republican. When you lose. You claim to be smarter and more informed than others.

I'm a conservative and have always expected the rich to give more than the poor. Always. This isn't against conservative principles. Jesus said the same thing. Paul said the same thing. I don't think government should force people to give through taxation but if they do.... then the rich should be taxed more. I don't see how you can reject such a principle. In fact, I bet if you phrased the question this way..... every Republican in the primary would say the same thing. They support a graduated tax system. Even the flat tax is graduated with those buying more paying more.

Here. Let me show a small bit of intelligence. I can't say I originated it ...... I got it from Jesus.

From the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.

When a candidate or supposed "news anchor" asks leading, biased.... gotcha questions. They are speaking from their heart. They are liberal.... and it shows in their speech.

Another chink in your "conservative" veneer. Every  BELIEVER is under Biblical mandate to help the widows and orphans and the poor (though not lazy). And "to whom much is given, much is expected". But that doesn't mean the government is supposed to be the agent of the same. It's a fact that conservatives give more to charity then liberals. A real conservative desires the government to be smaller and more local.

And since you are talking about biblical example. God asked a tithe, ten percent, of all. He doesn't ask for thirty percent on those who make more.    I have been for a flat tax for 30 years since I first heard conservative candidate for senate seat from CA, Bruce Herschenson articulate it. (And what you describe is not a flat tax.) Not only is a real flat tax fair but one of the best points it allows people to really understand just how much they pay in taxes and realize how much an increase in spending will affect their taxes or the national debt.

You must not have read what I wrote. I said I wanted less monies overall taken for taxes. Smaller government. Those who much should pay more taxes than the poor. There is nothing u conservative about that position.

A flat income tax is unrealistic and a flat consumption tax is still a graduated tax. The rich I'll buy more and pay more. The poor will by less and pay less.

Are you really for a tax system where the ultra rich pay the same rate as the destitute? Really?

I haven't tithed in close to 25 years. I don't have a number in my head but I with Mater on the consumption tax with some relief for large ticket items such as cars.

You sound more like a Democrat on tax policy than anything else. Emotions defining policy rather than facts. 

Whether you have paid tithe in 25 years or not doesn't negate that God didn't seem to think the flat tithe was "unfair".  Picking fights that "some aren't paying "their fair share" is utter nonsense no matter if you say everyone should pay less. Many put nothing in, only pull out. Is that "fair"? 

A flat tax can work. And it will work to drive the size of government down and make it harder to raise taxes.

I can tell you know very little about the tithe.

Ever heard of the third and sixth year tithe? Did you know the Temple wasn't built on the tithe. Neither did the Kings draw a salary from the tithe.

You're full of nonsense.

You are either obtuse or not bright enough to understand a simple concept.  I tend to lean toward the latter. 

 

[Just John]

 
? ?Trump wants to raise taxes on the hedge funds people?.
? ?They should!! (Regarding the rich paying their fair share).?
? ?I don't think the rich are hurting under Obama. Not even close. I think everyone should pay much less.

"I'm for taxing the hedge fund managers and increasing the capital gains on profits that exceed a certain amount. I think it's fair and I bet many people believe the same.? 

You think higher taxes will stop with hedge-fund managers?  LOL. Trump sure is playing a bunch of you.  He said he should be paying more and he's not a hedge-fund manager.

And who do you think should decide what a "fair share" is? Last year the top 1% paid 53% of taxes!!! The bottom 40% paid 4%. So I ask you, what is "fair"? The Dem's love to promote class envy and campaign against the rich because it plays to the less wealthy and buy's their votes. (They just typically never practice what they preach). But for every 757 jet and yacht Trum..., um, the rich buy the restaurants go to, the travel, etc., they provide jobs for people. Not to mention charity. Yes. trickle down economy does work! I'm by no means wealthy but at the same time I have zero jealousy for those who are.

My gross income put me in the top 10 percent last year. I paid my fair share.

The top 10 percents share of the tax burden has been falling slightly over the last 30 years. if I'm not mistaken, it was higher under Reagan.

Most all people think they paid THEIR "fair share". It's the OTHER person's "fair share" many worry about. 

When Reagan came into office the top rate was 70%. In 1985 it dropped to 28%. When Obama came into office it was 34%,. Now it's 39.6%

Such examples have always been deceptive. The 70 percent before Reagan wasn't the effective date. The effective rate has gradually declined over the last decade or so for the rich.

[/URL]  [/img]


The top 20% are quickly heading back to just about where they were in 1980. The remaining 80% are going back up a little but still remain much lower than 1980.

 

[praise_yeshua]

 
? ?Trump wants to raise taxes on the hedge funds people?.
? ?They should!! (Regarding the rich paying their fair share).?
? ?I don't think the rich are hurting under Obama. Not even close. I think everyone should pay much less.

"I'm for taxing the hedge fund managers and increasing the capital gains on profits that exceed a certain amount. I think it's fair and I bet many people believe the same.? 

You think higher taxes will stop with hedge-fund managers?  LOL. Trump sure is playing a bunch of you.  He said he should be paying more and he's not a hedge-fund manager.

And who do you think should decide what a "fair share" is? Last year the top 1% paid 53% of taxes!!! The bottom 40% paid 4%. So I ask you, what is "fair"? The Dem's love to promote class envy and campaign against the rich because it plays to the less wealthy and buy's their votes. (They just typically never practice what they preach). But for every 757 jet and yacht Trum..., um, the rich buy the restaurants go to, the travel, etc., they provide jobs for people. Not to mention charity. Yes. trickle down economy does work! I'm by no means wealthy but at the same time I have zero jealousy for those who are.

My gross income put me in the top 10 percent last year. I paid my fair share.

The top 10 percents share of the tax burden has been falling slightly over the last 30 years. if I'm not mistaken, it was higher under Reagan.

Most all people think they paid THEIR "fair share". It's the OTHER person's "fair share" many worry about. 

When Reagan came into office the top rate was 70%. In 1985 it dropped to 28%. When Obama came into office it was 34%,. Now it's 39.6%

Such examples have always been deceptive. The 70 percent before Reagan wasn't the effective date. The effective rate has gradually declined over the last decade or so for the rich.

[/URL]  [/img]


The top 20% are quickly heading back to just about where they were in 1980. The remaining 80% are going back up a little but still remain much lower than 1980.

Thanks for proving my point. The effective tax has declined over the last decade and the rate is close the last years of Reagan being in office.

 

[praise_yeshua]

The wealthy have more to give. I don't want anyone to have to give much of anything. However, so can afford it more than others.

Romney made a lot of poor Republicans mad. They didn't vote. He lost.

Well you have clearly proved yourself as someone who has no idea what a real conservative or liberal is. THAT is not a conservative tenant by any means.  I say again, low information voters.

The rest of your "specifics" were about as specific as Trump is on his great plans.

Typical establishment republican. When you lose. You claim to be smarter and more informed than others.

I'm a conservative and have always expected the rich to give more than the poor. Always. This isn't against conservative principles. Jesus said the same thing. Paul said the same thing. I don't think government should force people to give through taxation but if they do.... then the rich should be taxed more. I don't see how you can reject such a principle. In fact, I bet if you phrased the question this way..... every Republican in the primary would say the same thing. They support a graduated tax system. Even the flat tax is graduated with those buying more paying more.

Here. Let me show a small bit of intelligence. I can't say I originated it ...... I got it from Jesus.

From the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.

When a candidate or supposed "news anchor" asks leading, biased.... gotcha questions. They are speaking from their heart. They are liberal.... and it shows in their speech.

Another chink in your "conservative" veneer. Every  BELIEVER is under Biblical mandate to help the widows and orphans and the poor (though not lazy). And "to whom much is given, much is expected". But that doesn't mean the government is supposed to be the agent of the same. It's a fact that conservatives give more to charity then liberals. A real conservative desires the government to be smaller and more local.

And since you are talking about biblical example. God asked a tithe, ten percent, of all. He doesn't ask for thirty percent on those who make more.    I have been for a flat tax for 30 years since I first heard conservative candidate for senate seat from CA, Bruce Herschenson articulate it. (And what you describe is not a flat tax.) Not only is a real flat tax fair but one of the best points it allows people to really understand just how much they pay in taxes and realize how much an increase in spending will affect their taxes or the national debt.

You must not have read what I wrote. I said I wanted less monies overall taken for taxes. Smaller government. Those who much should pay more taxes than the poor. There is nothing u conservative about that position.

A flat income tax is unrealistic and a flat consumption tax is still a graduated tax. The rich I'll buy more and pay more. The poor will by less and pay less.

Are you really for a tax system where the ultra rich pay the same rate as the destitute? Really?

I haven't tithed in close to 25 years. I don't have a number in my head but I with Mater on the consumption tax with some relief for large ticket items such as cars.

You sound more like a Democrat on tax policy than anything else. Emotions defining policy rather than facts. 

Whether you have paid tithe in 25 years or not doesn't negate that God didn't seem to think the flat tithe was "unfair".  Picking fights that "some aren't paying "their fair share" is utter nonsense no matter if you say everyone should pay less. Many put nothing in, only pull out. Is that "fair"? 

A flat tax can work. And it will work to drive the size of government down and make it harder to raise taxes.

I can tell you know very little about the tithe.

Ever heard of the third and sixth year tithe? Did you know the Temple wasn't built on the tithe. Neither did the Kings draw a salary from the tithe.

You're full of nonsense.

You are either obtuse or not bright enough to understand a simple concept.  I tend to lean toward the latter.

You said the flat tax was just like the tithe. My using this example you implied that God was fine with the flat tax.

I pointed out that the tithe wasn't "flat". I'm sorry if you can't understand this. Its rather simple. Very simple. I mentioned the third and sixth year tithe that was exclusively for the tribe of Levi and the poor. I also was very clear in saying the Temple wasn't built using the tithe. Nor were the leaders/Kings of Israel compensated using the tithe.

Your comparison is bogus.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

The Rouge Tomato:

And there you have it in a nutshell.  We're fed up with the long history of spineless republicans since Reagan.  Trump fights, and that's what conservatives long for even more than this or that policy. 

Cruz fights, too, but he doesn't get as much media attention, so people are finding an outlet for their frustrations in Trump. 

Rsc2a:
I thought Trump was successful because conservatives were willing to overlook little issues like the fact that Trump was fine hacking up kids in the birth canal or that he thinks socialized medicine is grand because "he tells it like it is" or whatever.

Tarheel:
Trump's support is as much about dissatisfaction and anger with the Republican establishment as it is about him.

I don't disagree. And indeed there is much to be angry about with the GOP.  However so many finding a savior in Trump because "he fights" reminds me to those who revered the Jack Hyles types because "they fought" which really meant they were loud rude and abusive to those who disagreed with them. People were willing to overlook or even disbelieve the nonsense going on all around them. There have been many others like Father Coughlin and Huey Long to mention a couple notables from history.

Yes, fight!  But fight with the right ammunition (policy) and right leader.

Sorry for all the posts. Politics and religions is a real passion of mine.

The problem is that Trump is the exception to the Republican mealy mouth limp wristed leadership/establishment rule. Trump is not about conservatism...a mistake many here make because they have the establishment Republican mindset. If they don't begin to 'get it' they are going to lose their base....in fact they are losing their base as I type this.

I share your passion...

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Mark my words, if Trump does not get the nomination America will have a democrat president again.

I disagree.
I'm not a Trump fan.
I am a fan of his smacking the establishment on their backsides.
My hope and assumption is that Trump will not be the nominee....but admittedly the longer he maintains his current position the more my theory fades....

Except for Carson there'll all establishment so he's smacking the ones that we don't want in office.

Those that are running who isn't establishment?

Carson and Trump are not establishment, I agree.
I would submit that Ted Cruz is not an establishment candidate...in fact he is an outsider in his own party. He has taken them on and even called McConnell a liar.
I think he is the dark horse in the mix.

 

[rsc2a]

I thought Carson was the dark horse.

 

[Just John]

The Rouge Tomato:

And there you have it in a nutshell.  We're fed up with the long history of spineless republicans since Reagan.  Trump fights, and that's what conservatives long for even more than this or that policy. 

Cruz fights, too, but he doesn't get as much media attention, so people are finding an outlet for their frustrations in Trump. 

Rsc2a:
I thought Trump was successful because conservatives were willing to overlook little issues like the fact that Trump was fine hacking up kids in the birth canal or that he thinks socialized medicine is grand because "he tells it like it is" or whatever.

Tarheel:
Trump's support is as much about dissatisfaction and anger with the Republican establishment as it is about him.

I don't disagree. And indeed there is much to be angry about with the GOP.  However so many finding a savior in Trump because "he fights" reminds me to those who revered the Jack Hyles types because "they fought" which really meant they were loud rude and abusive to those who disagreed with them. People were willing to overlook or even disbelieve the nonsense going on all around them. There have been many others like Father Coughlin and Huey Long to mention a couple notables from history.

Yes, fight!  But fight with the right ammunition (policy) and right leader.

Sorry for all the posts. Politics and religions is a real passion of mine.

The problem is that Trump is the exception to the Republican mealy mouth limp wristed leadership/establishment rule. Trump is not about conservatism...a mistake many here make because they have the establishment Republican mindset. If they don't begin to 'get it' they are going to lose their base....in fact they are losing their base as I type this.

I share your passion...

I agree with much of what you say.  This article from National Review today (some claim NR is "establishment". William F. would spin in his grave. ) will really set you off as it should:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423679/corker-cardin-congress-obama-iran-nuclear-deal

The sham of giving Obama what he wants but appearing to be able to vote against it...twice!

 

[Just John]

The wealthy have more to give. I don't want anyone to have to give much of anything. However, so can afford it more than others.

Romney made a lot of poor Republicans mad. They didn't vote. He lost.

Well you have clearly proved yourself as someone who has no idea what a real conservative or liberal is. THAT is not a conservative tenant by any means.  I say again, low information voters.

The rest of your "specifics" were about as specific as Trump is on his great plans.

Typical establishment republican. When you lose. You claim to be smarter and more informed than others.

I'm a conservative and have always expected the rich to give more than the poor. Always. This isn't against conservative principles. Jesus said the same thing. Paul said the same thing. I don't think government should force people to give through taxation but if they do.... then the rich should be taxed more. I don't see how you can reject such a principle. In fact, I bet if you phrased the question this way..... every Republican in the primary would say the same thing. They support a graduated tax system. Even the flat tax is graduated with those buying more paying more.

Here. Let me show a small bit of intelligence. I can't say I originated it ...... I got it from Jesus.

From the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.

When a candidate or supposed "news anchor" asks leading, biased.... gotcha questions. They are speaking from their heart. They are liberal.... and it shows in their speech.

Another chink in your "conservative" veneer. Every  BELIEVER is under Biblical mandate to help the widows and orphans and the poor (though not lazy). And "to whom much is given, much is expected". But that doesn't mean the government is supposed to be the agent of the same. It's a fact that conservatives give more to charity then liberals. A real conservative desires the government to be smaller and more local.

And since you are talking about biblical example. God asked a tithe, ten percent, of all. He doesn't ask for thirty percent on those who make more.    I have been for a flat tax for 30 years since I first heard conservative candidate for senate seat from CA, Bruce Herschenson articulate it. (And what you describe is not a flat tax.) Not only is a real flat tax fair but one of the best points it allows people to really understand just how much they pay in taxes and realize how much an increase in spending will affect their taxes or the national debt.

You must not have read what I wrote. I said I wanted less monies overall taken for taxes. Smaller government. Those who much should pay more taxes than the poor. There is nothing u conservative about that position.

A flat income tax is unrealistic and a flat consumption tax is still a graduated tax. The rich I'll buy more and pay more. The poor will by less and pay less.

Are you really for a tax system where the ultra rich pay the same rate as the destitute? Really?

I haven't tithed in close to 25 years. I don't have a number in my head but I with Mater on the consumption tax with some relief for large ticket items such as cars.

You sound more like a Democrat on tax policy than anything else. Emotions defining policy rather than facts. 

Whether you have paid tithe in 25 years or not doesn't negate that God didn't seem to think the flat tithe was "unfair".  Picking fights that "some aren't paying "their fair share" is utter nonsense no matter if you say everyone should pay less. Many put nothing in, only pull out. Is that "fair"? 

A flat tax can work. And it will work to drive the size of government down and make it harder to raise taxes.

I can tell you know very little about the tithe.

Ever heard of the third and sixth year tithe? Did you know the Temple wasn't built on the tithe. Neither did the Kings draw a salary from the tithe.

You're full of nonsense.

You are either obtuse or not bright enough to understand a simple concept.  I tend to lean toward the latter.

You said the flat tax was just like the tithe. My using this example you implied that God was fine with the flat tax.

I pointed out that the tithe wasn't "flat". I'm sorry if you can't understand this. Its rather simple. Very simple. I mentioned the third and sixth year tithe that was exclusively for the tribe of Levi and the poor. I also was very clear in saying the Temple wasn't built using the tithe. Nor were the leaders/Kings of Israel compensated using the tithe.

Your comparison is bogus.

I do not believe the "flat tax is just like a tithe" mainly because they are not used for the same thing.

You are correct in that there is a three year and six year tithe for the poor...IF you grow produce.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Man. Donal has really put CNN in a hard spot.... I think its WONDERFUL.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-just-put-cnn-145112344.html

 

[Bruh]

Trump 2016!!

 

[praise_yeshua]

Looks like Carlson is playing the hyper fundamentalist card.... Fiorina is playing the the Hilary, Kelly and war against women card..... and Jindel is trying to just be relevant.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-escalates-war-of-words-with-fiorina-and-128782520291.html

 

[Just John]

Looks like Carlson is playing the hyper fundamentalist card.... Fiorina is playing the the Hilary, Kelly and war against women card..... and Jindel is trying to just be relevant.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-escalates-war-of-words-with-fiorina-and-128782520291.html

Trump is playing the "I'm the jerk that Megyn asked about...and I just proved it again...and again." card. LOL

Poor Donald. Somebody was a wee bit critical about him (rightly so in my very humble opinion of course) and he comes unglued...so far as to claim Carson was "just an okay doctor".  That's like calling Michael Jordan "just an okay basketball player".  It is entertaining to watch him come unglued. 

 

[praise_yeshua]

Looks like Carlson is playing the hyper fundamentalist card.... Fiorina is playing the the Hilary, Kelly and war against women card..... and Jindel is trying to just be relevant.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-escalates-war-of-words-with-fiorina-and-128782520291.html

Trump is playing the "I'm the jerk that Megyn asked about...and I just proved it again...and again." card. LOL

Poor Donald. Somebody was a wee bit critical about him (rightly so in my very humble opinion of course) and he comes unglued...so far as to claim Carson was "just an okay doctor".  That's like calling Michael Jordan "just an okay basketball player".  It is entertaining to watch him come unglued. 

He didn't come "unglued". He was rather smart about it. People are talking about him again. He'll go up in the polls again. Everyone pays attention to what he says. No one is paying attention to the other candidates.

Carlson questioned his faith. Carlson made a mistake. He'll suffer for it. Donald had the perfect response. They only focus on the part about the "good doctor". Carlson made a hyper fundamentalist mistake. He thinks his faith is greater than his competitors. Carlson lost himself in the rhetoric.

I predict that Fiorina will implode. Trump has said things against most all the candidates but Cruz and Huckabee. He says something about Fiorina and everyone wants to whine. She does have a problem with her persona.

 

[Bruh]

What's the worst Trump could do? Start us down the wrong road. LOL!

 

[Bruh]

The biggest problem I see with all but Trump is that when pushed in a corner, Trump will tell them to, sit down and shut up!

Tell me who else would do this?

 

[Just John]

Looks like Carlson is playing the hyper fundamentalist card.... Fiorina is playing the the Hilary, Kelly and war against women card..... and Jindel is trying to just be relevant.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-escalates-war-of-words-with-fiorina-and-128782520291.html

Trump is playing the "I'm the jerk that Megyn asked about...and I just proved it again...and again." card. LOL

Poor Donald. Somebody was a wee bit critical about him (rightly so in my very humble opinion of course) and he comes unglued...so far as to claim Carson was "just an okay doctor".  That's like calling Michael Jordan "just an okay basketball player".  It is entertaining to watch him come unglued. 

He didn't come "unglued". He was rather smart about it. People are talking about him again. He'll go up in the polls again. Everyone pays attention to what he says. No one is paying attention to the other candidates.

Carlson questioned his faith. Carlson made a mistake. He'll suffer for it. Donald had the perfect response. They only focus on the part about the "good doctor". Carlson made a hyper fundamentalist mistake. He thinks his faith is greater than his competitors. Carlson lost himself in the rhetoric.

I predict that Fiorina will implode. Trump has said things against most all the candidates but Cruz and Huckabee. He says something about Fiorina and everyone wants to whine. She does have a problem with her persona.

"Carlson" = Low-information voter.  LOL

"When I look at myself in the first grade and I look at myself now, I?m basically the same. The temperament is not that different." -  Donald Trump

 

[Bruh]

Trump president and Carson VP!!!

America can't loose with a ticket like that!!

And I'm not speaking spiritually, of course.