Thai King James Bible?

[prophet]

But when they differ in word and meaning how can they all be his word (words).

When the KJV says in the Old Testament: Thou shalt not commit kill... Then

The KJV says in the New Testament: Thou shalt not commit murder

... the differences in meaning can be accepted by understanding that one is more precise than the other and that "murder" is the more correct reading.

Since the KJV translation committees did not have consistency, we don't react by saying that God is not the author of confusion... We just realize that God uses imperfect men to give us an appreciable amount of Bibles for colorful word study!

I can get on board with the variety within a textual family.

I see Rome behind the CT.

For me it's this simple.

earnestly contend

 

[FSSL]

You see Rome behind the CT but not the RT?

Good thing Rome had the resources and know-how to help preserve ALL of the manuscripts that made up the RT as well as the CT.

6 of the 7 manuscripts, the Roman Catholic Erasmus used, were held by the Dominican Library in Brasel. The other manuscript was in the possession of the Roman Catholic, Johann Amerbach.

So... the manuscripts that Erasmus used to make the RT were 100% the property of Rome, compiled by a Roman Catholic.

If you use "Rome" as your argument, then you lose. Some of the mss in the CT were not held in Rome's possession and still are not to this day.