The Four Gospels mentioned in the New Testament

RAIDER said:
How could one be a true disciple if they were slow of heart and unwilling to believe?  Are you saying that these two on the Road to Emmaus didn't understand that Jesus was the Messiah that came into this world to give his life for their sins and then be resurrected?  If that be the case how could they be true disciples.  They, like other Jews, were looking for a Messiah to set up His Kingdom, not a Messiah to die on a cross.

Now when John heard in prison about the deeds of the Christ, he sent word by his disciples and said to him, “Are you the one who is to come, or shall we look for another?” And Jesus answered them, “Go and tell John what you hear and see: the blind receive their sight and the lame walk, lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear, and the dead are raised up, and the poor have good news preached to them. And blessed is the one who is not offended by me.”

And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up. And as was his custom, he went to the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and he stood up to read. And the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor.”

When Jesus identified Himself as the Messiah through the OT prophecies, it wasn't about His death and resurrection to which He identified Himself. Hence, there is no reason to assume that His disciples were to understand that He would be a sacrifice or die for sin. Even at their last Passover meal.
 
After all the additional information by BB.. I stand by my original view of him and his approach. He is a heretic and they are heretical.  I would let him teach my bird dog .
 
T-Bone said:
After all the additional information by BB.. I stand by my original view of him and his approach. He is a heretic and they are heretical.  I would let him teach my bird dog .

Maybe if your bird dog is a poodle.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
RAIDER said:
How could one be a true disciple if they were slow of heart and unwilling to believe?  Are you saying that these two on the Road to Emmaus didn't understand that Jesus was the Messiah that came into this world to give his life for their sins and then be resurrected?  If that be the case how could they be true disciples.  They, like other Jews, were looking for a Messiah to set up His Kingdom, not a Messiah to die on a cross.

Now when John heard in prison about the deeds of the Christ, he sent word by his disciples and said to him, “Are you the one who is to come, or shall we look for another?” And Jesus answered them, “Go and tell John what you hear and see: the blind receive their sight and the lame walk, lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear, and the dead are raised up, and the poor have good news preached to them. And blessed is the one who is not offended by me.”

And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up. And as was his custom, he went to the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and he stood up to read. And the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor.”

When Jesus identified Himself as the Messiah through the OT prophecies, it wasn't about His death and resurrection to which He identified Himself. Hence, there is no reason to assume that His disciples were to understand that He would be a sacrifice or die for sin. Even at their last Passover meal.

You're getting worse every day. You'll face God one day all alone with your unbelief. I wish you'd really get off this wagon you're riding straight to hell. You're entirely too intelligent to believe such nonsense as you're shelling out these days. Go get you some bacon......make yourself a huge BLT and think about it for a while.
 
BALAAM said:
T-Bone said:
After all the additional information by BB.. I stand by my original view of him and his approach. He is a heretic and they are heretical.  I would let him teach my bird dog .

Maybe if your bird dog is a poodle.

Heretic # 3.... I wouldn't worry about those kicking the "pricks".
 
Biscuit....  Biscuit.... Biscuit.....

I have very little tolerance for heretics anymore. First, it has been my experience for many many years..... that people really don't want to learn anything. They don't. It doesn't matter to them at all. All they care about is what club they're attending...... and how to advance themselves among their peers. I have no such desires. I don't care what you think of me. I don't. Not in the least. Nada.

As far as your comments are concerned.........

They didn't need Paul's epistles. Abraham understood it just fine without having to get an advanced copy of Paul's words. So did Moses. So did David. So did the prophets. So did Rahab, Ruth, Tamar, Adam, Enoch....... and so many more. Did you know that the seventh man from Adam himself..... preached about the resurrection and the return of our Lord? Did you?

Those OT saints knew a lot more than you give them credit for..... in fact ..... they have to be more informed than you are..... How does that make you feel? Are you jealous????

You see...... mankind in this generation thinks they are smarter than any generation that's ever been before them..... And they're really not. In fact..... the more I study. The more I learn.....I realize just how dumb this generation has become. You can not ignore the wealth of information that has been lost to generations past.

Sorry biscuit. You don't know anything more than Abraham did. Nothing. Read all the epistles of Paul you want to. Abraham...... LIVED it.
 
biscuit1953 said:
The Old Testament was filled with types and symbols that spoke of Jesus' sufferings and death.  He no doubt showed them prophetic passages pointing to His death such as Isaiah 53 and Zech 12:10 and 13:7.  He probably expounded the true meaning of passages like Gen 3:15 and Dan 9:26 as well as numerous passages that may have been foggy to those before Christ came.  They didn't have the benefit of Paul's epistles and the clear explanation of the glorious gospel explained to Paul through direct revelation.  We can look back and see things that Jesus' disciples at that time could not see.  That is my understanding anyway.

I agree with the above post.  Here is the problem.  We are not debating whether or not the OT spoke of Jesus' suffering and death and is filled with pictures and types of Christ.  We live in a wonderful age when we can look back and clearly see this.  These disciples on the Road to Emmaus had the OT Scriptures, the disciples had the OT Scriptures, those who walked with Christ while he was on the earth had the OT Scriptures, yet they did not see or comprehend the death, burial, and resurrection on our Lord.  I believe everyone posting on this thread would agree with this.

In most of the OT we find God's people searching for a land and a great nation.  We find them looking for a Messiah that would set up His kingdom and redeem the Nation of Israel.  Yes, we can look back today and see Scriptures is Psalms, Isaiah, etc that point to Christ and His redeeming work.  It seems as if the people were blind to these Scriptures.

Here is the debate on this thread.  We know the Gospel to be the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ.  We know that to be the only way of salvation.  If those in the OT and those that walked with Christ were blind to the facts, how were they redeemed?

Because I am asking questions of interest does not mean that I agree with Biblebeliever.  It means that I feel this topic deserves discussion. 
 
RAIDER said:
biscuit1953 said:
The Old Testament was filled with types and symbols that spoke of Jesus' sufferings and death.  He no doubt showed them prophetic passages pointing to His death such as Isaiah 53 and Zech 12:10 and 13:7.  He probably expounded the true meaning of passages like Gen 3:15 and Dan 9:26 as well as numerous passages that may have been foggy to those before Christ came.  They didn't have the benefit of Paul's epistles and the clear explanation of the glorious gospel explained to Paul through direct revelation.  We can look back and see things that Jesus' disciples at that time could not see.  That is my understanding anyway.

I agree with the above post.  Here is the problem.  We are not debating whether or not the OT spoke of Jesus' suffering and death and is filled with pictures and types of Christ.  We live in a wonderful age when we can look back and clearly see this.  These disciples on the Road to Emmaus had the OT Scriptures, the disciples had the OT Scriptures, those who walked with Christ while he was on the earth had the OT Scriptures, yet they did not see or comprehend the death, burial, and resurrection on our Lord.  I believe everyone posting on this thread would agree with this.

In most of the OT we find God's people searching for a land and a great nation.  We find them looking for a Messiah that would set up His kingdom and redeem the Nation of Israel.  Yes, we can look back today and see Scriptures is Psalms, Isaiah, etc that point to Christ and His redeeming work.  It seems as if the people were blind to these Scriptures.

Here is the debate on this thread.  We know the Gospel to be the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ.  We know that to be the only way of salvation.  If those in the OT and those that walked with Christ were blind to the facts, how were they redeemed?

Because I am asking questions of interest does not mean that I agree with Biblebeliever.  It means that I feel this topic deserves discussion.

Job 19:23-27
23 Oh that my words were now written!
oh that they were printed in a book!
24 That they were graven with an iron pen and lead
in the rock for ever!
25 For I know that my redeemer liveth,
and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:
26 And though after my skin worms destroy this body,
yet in my flesh shall I see God:
27 Whom I shall see for myself,
and mine eyes shall behold,
and not another; though my reins be consumed within me.


Job didn't have Moses.


Psa 19:14
14 Let the words of my mouth,
and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight,
O Lord, my strength, and my redeemer.

David did.

Seems like they knew.


Anishinaabe

 
christundivided said:
Do you know stupid that is??????

That same Paul you're talking about said....

Rom 4:2  For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.

Paul spoke of the outward appearance of being blameless to the law. In other words... YOU couldn't put your finger on anything whereby to condemn him......

NOT THAT GOD COULDN'T.


Again, those that kept the Law in the Old Testament were blameless because there were provisions placed in the Law to offer an atonement for their sins and trangressions, hence, their sins and trangressions made against the Law would be covered when the necessary offering was given.

There sins were not taken away though. Only when the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ that was shed on the cross at Calvary could take away their (Old Testament Saints) sins.


Also, in Romans 4, who is Paul writing to???

He was writing to Christians in Rome.



Romans 1

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, 2 (which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,) 3 concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; 4 and declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead: 5 by whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name: 6 among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ: 7 to all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.


So yeah; naturally, Paul is writing from a perspective of Faith only when mentioning the sacrifice which Abraham gave of his begotten son (Isaac).

But when we read James, we see that James comes with another perspective:



James 2:20-26

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead? 21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? 22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? 23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. 24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only. 25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way? 26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.


James addresses the account of Abraham and his offering of his son Isaac from a perspective of Faith and Works for justification.

Now you be wondering why is that?

Well because James is adressing the twelve tribes of Israel which are scattered abroad.

James is not written to Christians, it is written to the Jews in the time of Jacob's trouble:



James 1:1

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)


1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.


You need to get this fact down in your mind and that is this. Salvation along with justification in the time of Jacob's trouble (7 year tribulation) will be by Faith and Works.

Faith will not be enough to get a person saved in that time frame. A person will need works to accompany his faith if he wants to make it into the Millennial Kingdom of Christ. That is why when we read Matthew 25 where it entails the Judgment of the Nations, we see that that Judgment is based on their treatment of Christ's Brethren. It is based purely upon their works.
 
Biblebeliever said:
christundivided said:
Do you know stupid that is??????

That same Paul you're talking about said....

Rom 4:2  For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.

Paul spoke of the outward appearance of being blameless to the law. In other words... YOU couldn't put your finger on anything whereby to condemn him......

NOT THAT GOD COULDN'T.


Again, those that kept the Law in the Old Testament were blameless because there were provisions placed in the Law to offer an atonement for their sins and trangressions, hence, their sins and trangressions made against the Law would be covered when the necessary offering was given.

There sins were not taken away though. Only when the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ that was shed on the cross at Calvary could take away their (Old Testament Saints) sins.


Also, in Romans 4, who is Paul writing to???

He was writing to Christians in Rome.



Romans 1

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, 2 (which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,) 3 concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; 4 and declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead: 5 by whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name: 6 among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ: 7 to all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.


So yeah; naturally, Paul is writing from a perspective of Faith only when mentioning the sacrifice which Abraham gave of his begotten son (Isaac).

But when we read James, we see that James comes with another perspective:



James 2:20-26

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead? 21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? 22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? 23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. 24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only. 25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way? 26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.


James addresses the account of Abraham and his offering of his son Isaac from a perspective of Faith and Works for justification.

Now you be wondering why is that?

Well because James is adressing the twelve tribes of Israel which are scattered abroad.

James is not written to Christians, it is written to the Jews in the time of Jacob's trouble:



James 1:1

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)


1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.


You need to get this fact down in your mind and that is this. Salvation along with justification in the time of Jacob's trouble (7 year tribulation) will be by Faith and Works.

Faith will not be enough to get a person saved in that time frame. A person will need works to accompany his faith if he wants to make it into the Millennial Kingdom of Christ. That is why when we read Matthew 25 where it entails the Judgment of the Nations, we see that that Judgment is based on their treatment of Christ's Brethren. It is based purely upon their works.

Faith is manifested by Works.

You express your faith, by works.

Abrahamed believed God, and so he acted on it.

He had to.  God told him to do something radical, that made no sense.

Leave your homeland
Kill your son
Your antique wife is gonna have a baby.

How could he say he believed God, if he never took the first step?

It was still faith, because he couldn't see the end, when he started.

Psa 27:13
13 I had fainted, unless I had believed
to see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living.

1Pe 1:7-11
7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:
8 Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory:
9 Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.
10 Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:
11 Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.


Rom 4:3-5
3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. 4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.
5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.


Now that is rightly divided.

Anishinaabe

 
RAIDER said:
biscuit1953 said:
The Old Testament was filled with types and symbols that spoke of Jesus' sufferings and death.  He no doubt showed them prophetic passages pointing to His death such as Isaiah 53 and Zech 12:10 and 13:7.  He probably expounded the true meaning of passages like Gen 3:15 and Dan 9:26 as well as numerous passages that may have been foggy to those before Christ came.  They didn't have the benefit of Paul's epistles and the clear explanation of the glorious gospel explained to Paul through direct revelation.  We can look back and see things that Jesus' disciples at that time could not see.  That is my understanding anyway.

I agree with the above post.  Here is the problem.  We are not debating whether or not the OT spoke of Jesus' suffering and death and is filled with pictures and types of Christ.  We live in a wonderful age when we can look back and clearly see this.  These disciples on the Road to Emmaus had the OT Scriptures, the disciples had the OT Scriptures, those who walked with Christ while he was on the earth had the OT Scriptures, yet they did not see or comprehend the death, burial, and resurrection on our Lord.  I believe everyone posting on this thread would agree with this.

In most of the OT we find God's people searching for a land and a great nation.  We find them looking for a Messiah that would set up His kingdom and redeem the Nation of Israel.  Yes, we can look back today and see Scriptures is Psalms, Isaiah, etc that point to Christ and His redeeming work.  It seems as if the people were blind to these Scriptures.

Here is the debate on this thread.  We know the Gospel to be the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ.  We know that to be the only way of salvation.  If those in the OT and those that walked with Christ were blind to the facts, how were they redeemed?

Because I am asking questions of interest does not mean that I agree with Biblebeliever.  It means that I feel this topic deserves discussion.

They dis uch.... because that is what they were taught by their Fathers... that had forsaken the truth. Have you ever read the sermon given by Stephen? It would do you good to spend some time reading it.....

They listened to their no good "fathers" rather..... than listen to the Scriptures. Does this sound familiar?

Either way.... the reason you're so interested in such a discussion..... is because you're sympathetic to the teaching. I'm not. I abhor it. God does too. Its a lie. Plain and simple. You don't give a lie one second to "catch its breath".
 
Biblebeliever said:
Again, those that kept the Law in the Old Testament were blameless because there were provisions placed in the Law to offer an atonement for their sins and trangressions, hence, their sins and trangressions made against the Law would be covered when the necessary offering was given.

You know....you're such an idiot.....

Just when did any provision in the law make something blameless? You must think Paul was a liar when he wrote...

Rom 7:14  For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Rom 7:15  For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

Rom 7:18  For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
Rom 7:19  For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.

Oh by the way.... If these sacrificial offerings made people "blameless" in the OT...... They pray tell how is it you're saying it took "faith and works"? Looks like you have created a system that simple makes man blameless through animal sacrifices.....

also, in Romans 4, who is Paul writing to???
He was writing to Christians in Rome.

He was writing to Christians in ROME about ABRAHAM.... WHAT ABRAHAM experienced thousands of years earlier.

They really don't make too many people this stupid.... You're in a class all your own.

So yeah; naturally, Paul is writing from a perspective of Faith only when mentioning the sacrifice which Abraham gave of his begotten son (Isaac).

Glad you agree.

But when we read James, we see that James comes with another perspective:

James 2:20-26
James addresses the account of Abraham and his offering of his son Isaac from a perspective of Faith and Works for justification.


Well because James is adressing the twelve tribes of Israel which are scattered abroad.

James is not written to Christians, it is written to the Jews in the time of Jacob's trouble:[/quote]

You know... I think I have totally.... wasted my time....

I don't think I've ever seen someone say that the the "Book of James" is prophesy concerning a future generation of Jews..... living during the time of "Jacob's trouble."

That's really just the icing on the "turd".

Did you really just say that????

You need Lithium treatments.... Shock therapy... and A Full Labotomy........ (figuratively speaking).




 
RAIDER said:
biscuit1953 said:
The Old Testament was filled with types and symbols that spoke of Jesus' sufferings and death.  He no doubt showed them prophetic passages pointing to His death such as Isaiah 53 and Zech 12:10 and 13:7.  He probably expounded the true meaning of passages like Gen 3:15 and Dan 9:26 as well as numerous passages that may have been foggy to those before Christ came.  They didn't have the benefit of Paul's epistles and the clear explanation of the glorious gospel explained to Paul through direct revelation.  We can look back and see things that Jesus' disciples at that time could not see.  That is my understanding anyway.

I agree with the above post.  Here is the problem.  We are not debating whether or not the OT spoke of Jesus' suffering and death and is filled with pictures and types of Christ.  We live in a wonderful age when we can look back and clearly see this.  These disciples on the Road to Emmaus had the OT Scriptures, the disciples had the OT Scriptures, those who walked with Christ while he was on the earth had the OT Scriptures, yet they did not see or comprehend the death, burial, and resurrection on our Lord.  I believe everyone posting on this thread would agree with this.

In most of the OT we find God's people searching for a land and a great nation.  We find them looking for a Messiah that would set up His kingdom and redeem the Nation of Israel.  Yes, we can look back today and see Scriptures is Psalms, Isaiah, etc that point to Christ and His redeeming work.  It seems as if the people were blind to these Scriptures.

Here is the debate on this thread.  We know the Gospel to be the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ.  We know that to be the only way of salvation.  If those in the OT and those that walked with Christ were blind to the facts, how were they redeemed?

Because I am asking questions of interest does not mean that I agree with Biblebeliever.  It means that I feel this topic deserves discussion.
I think I understand your question.  How were the Old Testaments saints redeemed?  The answer is found in Hebrews.  Many people confuse "remission" (forgiveness) with "redemption."

Hebrews 9:22

22 And according to the law almost all things are purified with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no remission.

They were justified by faith in what God told them (Romans 4:1-4) and forgiven on the basis of the blood of bulls and goats (Heb 9:27).  However, the blood of bulls and goats could not "take away sins" (Heb 10:4).  In short, they were not redeemed in the Old Testament, only  forgiven.  Their sins were actually paid for when Christ shed His blood (1 Pet 1:18,19). 

To illustrate it just imagine that while you were on vacation a penniless hobo broke into your home and knocked holes in the walls, destroyed the plumbing, killed the cat, and vandalized everything of value.  Imagine the perpetrator is caught and is very remorseful for what he did and pleads for mercy and forgiveness for what he did.  You may find it in yourself to forgive the individual but that doesn't pay for the damage.  The same with the Old Testament saints.  God forgave them based upon their repentance and the sacrifices of animals but that didn't pay for their sins.  That only took place when Christ shed His blood and the great exchange took place (2 Cor 5:21). 
 
BB says the OT believers were saved and made blameless by keeping the law, if this is true there was no need for Jesus to come...but he is in serious error as Paul says what the blood of the animal sacrifice could not do God did in sending His Son. He then says the tribulation saints are saved by Jesus plus works, seems BB is a closet Catholic...Jesus plus anything for salvation is heresy!
 
christundivided said:
Let me get this.....

You say all I have to do is believe the book...... and then you tell me I have to study "dispensations"......


Dispensations are in the Bible.

And if you want to understand the Scriptures better, one of things you must do is rightly divide the word of truth. Just as the Holy Ghost commands us to.


christundivided said:
Do you see anything wrong with what you've said? Anything?

The Truth has been known..... long before "Darby" created modern "dispensationalism".


This is not about Darby. Darby got somethings wrong.

He is not the Final Authority. The Scriptures are the Final Authority. And the Scriptures teach that there are different economies and dispensations in which God has dealt with mankind.
 
christundivided said:
Let me get this straight..... All believer before the introduction of the law.... were saved by faith/believing in what God said....


Well actually I need to correct myself; looking further into this study of how salvation was in the Old Testament, I am starting to see that there were an element of works for even Old Testament saints who lived before the giving of the Mosaic Law.

For instance, take Noah. How was Noah saved?

Well God commanded and told Noah to build an ark of Gopher wood. And how did Moses react?


He obeyed:


Genesis 6:22

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



22 Thus did Noah; according to all that God commanded him, so did he.


Now what helped me to understand the fact that an element of works has consistently been present for salvation even before the Law, is by the simple fact that the Old Testament Saints will show up at the Great White Throne Judgment to be judged by their works.

In other words, the Great White Throne Judgment is not just for the wicked dead, but it is also for the Old Testament saints:



Revelation 20:11-15

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. 12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. 13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.


Noah's judgment will take place at the Great White Throne Judgment. And so will Adam and Eve's. Saints in the Millennial Kingdom will also be judged at the Great White Throne Judgment.

Knowing this; therefore, an element of works were involved with faith for salvation even before the time of the Mosaic Law.

The word 'faith' is only found two times in the entire Old Testament.




christundivided said:
YET, those born after the law were required to keep the law to be saved?

Is that what you're saying? ( I know that is what you're saying.... because I've meet many nuts like you before)

There are many problems with what you've said. Many.... Lets just deal with one for now.

First, lets review what Paul said in Romans 4

Rom 4:14  For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect:

Read it again......

Now I know you're going to say this was a different dispensation. I know that is coming ..... so let me stop you before you do.

Fast forward to Galatians.... or rather rewind in the life of Paul....

Gal 3:17  And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
Gal 3:18  For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.



In regard to Galatians 3:18, why don't we quote in context:



Galatians 3:12-24

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: 14 that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man’s covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.

19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator. 20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.

21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. 22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. 24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.


What Paul basically said is that the Law cannot disannul the covenant that God confirmed in Christ.

He also said that before faith came, we were kept under the law.




christundivided said:
Now slow down..... Don't spend 10,000 words to explain just how the "law" changed anything when it comes to man being saved?

Paul clearly taught that believers were saved by faith alone BEFORE THE LAW..... He then says very clearly that the promises made to that believers could not be "disannuled" or the promise made " of none effect".


Is Paul really teaching that? Or is that simply according to your interpretation of the passage???



christundivided said:
So tell me HOW your silly doctrine deals with this. Paul clear uses the fact that the promises were made before the law.... and THUS.....the law could not change those promises. You're saying the exact opposite. You're using the same Scriptures to say that LOT was saved through faith... PLUS NOTHING.... and then claiming those after the law could not be saved the "same" way.


I agree that the Law could not change those promises.

But that still does not mean that Old Testament saints were saved the same way we are today. You have to keep in mind that when a person in the Old Testament was saved, the righteousness which was imputed to him was based upon the works which he did.

Another thing that is important to note is that righteousness in the Old Testament does not ever mean sinlessness.

The righteousness which the Old Testament saints had was their own.


christundivided said:
What a silly silly thing to say. Its in direct opposition to what is taught in the Scriptures. The truth is... The law WAS NEVER GIVEN TO SAVE ANYTHING. Not now. Not then. NEVER.... under any 'dispensation" you think you understand.


If what you say here is true; well then what about this passage of Scripture:



Ezekiel 18:1-20

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



18 The word of the Lord came unto me again, saying, 2 What mean ye, that ye use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge? 3 As I live, saith the Lord God, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel. 4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.

5 But if a man be just, and do that which is lawful and right, 6 and hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, neither hath defiled his neighbour’s wife, neither hath come near to a menstruous woman, 7 and hath not oppressed any, but hath restored to the debtor his pledge, hath spoiled none by violence, hath given his bread to the hungry, and hath covered the naked with a garment; 8 he that hath not given forth upon usury, neither hath taken any increase, that hath withdrawn his hand from iniquity, hath executed true judgment between man and man, 9 hath walked in my statutes, and hath kept my judgments, to deal truly; he is just, he shall surely live, saith the Lord God.
10 If he beget a son that is a robber, a shedder of blood, and that doeth the like to any one of these things, 11 and that doeth not any of those duties, but even hath eaten upon the mountains, and defiled his neighbour’s wife, 12 hath oppressed the poor and needy, hath spoiled by violence, hath not restored the pledge, and hath lifted up his eyes to the idols, hath committed abomination, 13 hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he shall not live: he hath done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him.

14 Now, lo, if he beget a son, that seeth all his father’s sins which he hath done, and considereth, and doeth not such like, 15 that hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, hath not defiled his neighbour’s wife, 16 neither hath oppressed any, hath not withholden the pledge, neither hath spoiled by violence, but hath given his bread to the hungry, and hath covered the naked with a garment, 17 that hath taken off his hand from the poor, that hath not received usury nor increase, hath executed my judgments, hath walked in my statutes; he shall not die for the iniquity of his father, he shall surely live. 18 As for his father, because he cruelly oppressed, spoiled his brother by violence, and did that which is not good among his people, lo, even he shall die in his iniquity.

19 Yet say ye, Why? doth not the son bear the iniquity of the father? When the son hath done that which is lawful and right, and hath kept all my statutes, and hath done them, he shall surely live. 20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.


This passage here in Ezekiel 18 clearly teaches that a man is saved by his works and by his righteousness.

If you still do not believe that this is the case, then let us look now at the remaining passage of Ezekiel 18:



Ezekiel 18:21-32

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



21 But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die. 22 All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him: in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live. 23 Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord God: and not that he should return from his ways, and live?

24 But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked man doeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die.
25 Yet ye say, The way of the Lord is not equal. Hear now, O house of Israel; Is not my way equal? are not your ways unequal? 26 When a righteous man turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and dieth in them; for his iniquity that he hath done shall he die. 27 Again, when the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness that he hath committed, and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive. 28 Because he considereth, and turneth away from all his transgressions that he hath committed, he shall surely live, he shall not die. 29 Yet saith the house of Israel, The way of the Lord is not equal. O house of Israel, are not my ways equal? are not your ways unequal?

30 Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, saith the Lord God. Repent, and turn yourselves from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall not be your ruin. 31 Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel? 32 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord God: wherefore turn yourselves, and live ye.


Now do you realize what you just read?

You just read how a man in the Old Testament was saved. Ezekiel 18 teaches that a man was saved by doing the right kind of works (see verses 5-9, 15-17), if a man did that which was lawful and right, he was saved and lived. But if that same man turned from his righteousness and committed iniquity and if he did not repent, that man would then die and go to Hell.

WORKS... WORKS.... WORKS. 


Again see verses 5-9 & 15-17. A man was justified by doing those very works which Ezekiel lists in those verses I shared.

Now read the passage and study it. And don't try to "greekify it" or "explain it away." Just leave the verses as they stand.

They clearly teach that if a man did that which was right (works) he would then live (salvation).

Salvation by works with an element of faith.

Therefore, if Old Testament saints were saved by works, that also must means that under the dispensation of the Mosaic Covenant, they were saved by obeying the Law.


 
prophet said:
Eph 3:1-7
Chapter 3
1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles,
2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you- ward:
3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words,
4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)
5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;
6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:

I guess the Jews , Noah, and Adam aren't sons of men?

What body are we fellow heirs of?


Anishinaabe


The passage gives you the answer.

The body which Paul is talking about in verse 6 is the Body of Christ.



Ephesians 3:6-13

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)


6 that the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: 7 whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power. 8 Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; 9 and to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: 10 to the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, 11 according to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord: 12 in whom we have boldness and access with confidence by the faith of him. 13 Wherefore I desire that ye faint not at my tribulations for you, which is your glory.




Ephesians 1:22-23

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)



22 and hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, 23 which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.




Ephesians 2:15-17

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)


15 having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; 16 and that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby: 17 and came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh.




Ephesians 4:12-16

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)


12 for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: 13 till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: 14 that we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive; 15 but speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ: 16 from whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.




Ephesians 5:23-30

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)


23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. 24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. 25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; 26 that he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, 27 that he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. 28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. 29 For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: 30 for we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
 
Well, since you got one thing right, we'll build on it.

Fellowheirs with us, in the Body of Christ, are the OT saints.


Anishinaabe

 
christundivided said:
First, it has been my experience for many many years..... that people really don't want to learn anything. They don't. It doesn't matter to them at all.


You basically just described yourself along with many other Fundamentalists as well as Baptists who are no longer teachable. Instead of being open to more revelation and truth shown in the word of God, both you and them simply refuse to acknowledge the truth which is shown in the verses in which you cannot comprehend. And instead of taking the verses on Old Testament salvation as they stand, you simply twist and spiritualize them in order to explain them away. And why? I know why. Because you are more loyal to a pet "historic position" then you are to the Holy Bible.

 
Back
Top