The Left Applauds Rape of Infant.

Ekklesian

Ekklesian

Well-known member
Doctor
Elect
Joined
May 17, 2021
Messages
6,672
Reaction score
1,465
Points
113
Location
Western Hemisphere
Looks like the SBC is joining that bandwagon as well. Saw on Twitter that some SBC summer camps want to use CRT is their message to get kids saved. It's truly a sad day.
 
Ekklesian said:
www.theblaze.com

Viral video: Trans man gives birth to baby — and trans woman unsuccessfully tries to nurse the child | Blaze Media

A transgender couple has gone viral for their decidedly unconventional family in which the trans man — or biological female — gave birth to their child, while the trans woman — a biological male — attempted to nurse the baby. What are the details? The trans woman — whose name is Petrona and who...
www.theblaze.com www.theblaze.com
Click to expand...
I don't see anywhere where this would qualify as rape. It does, however, qualify as child abuse...at least it would have been when my wife and I were foster parents here in Tennessee. The heading on this post is false IMHO
 
AverageJoe said:
I don't see anywhere where this would qualify as rape. It does, however, qualify as child abuse...at least it would have been when my wife and I were foster parents here in Tennessee. The heading on this post is false IMHO
Click to expand...
Well, let's see...

A man pretending to be a woman inserts his nipple into the mouth of an infant. He knows and you know that the baby isn't being nurtured or nourished by the act.

It isn't about the child. It's about him and his arousal—his and the bearded lady's—theirs and all the pervs excited by it. And the exploited child is a victim.

There you go. Child porn. That's a rape.
 
Last edited:
AverageJoe said:
My church is SBC, and we've never heard that. Care to post a link that proves this???
Click to expand...
Have you heard of the infamous Falls Creek summer camp in Oklahoma? I was on Twitter and read some tweets that some of the speakers are woke and lightly sprinkling CRT messages. Sadly they also play Hellsong, Elevation (Furtick's false church "worship" team), Bethel "worship" music now in their camps.
 
TonyHutsonComedian said:
Have you heard of the infamous Falls Creek summer camp in Oklahoma? I was on Twitter and read some tweets that some of the speakers are woke and lightly sprinkling CRT messages. Sadly they also play Hellsong, Elevation (Furtick's false church "worship" team), Bethel "worship" music now in their camps.
Click to expand...
No proof? UGH! Typical!
 
Ekklesian said:
Well, let's see...

A man pretending to be a woman inserts his nipple into the mouth of an infant. He knows and you know that the baby isn't being nurtured or nourished by the act.

It isn't about the child. It's about him and his arousal—his and the bearded lady's—theirs and all the pervs excited by it. And the exploited child is a victim.

There you go. Child porn. That's a rape.
Click to expand...
Sorry...it still doesn't fit the legal definition of rape. Child abuse, yes! Rape? No.

Rape Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

In the United States, rape is the most serious form of sexual assault punishable by law, but the definition of what constitutes rape varies from state to state. In all states, if a man forcibly
definitions.uslegal.com definitions.uslegal.com
 
AverageJoe said:
Sorry...it still doesn't fit the legal definition of rape. Child abuse, yes! Rape? No.

Rape Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

In the United States, rape is the most serious form of sexual assault punishable by law, but the definition of what constitutes rape varies from state to state. In all states, if a man forcibly
definitions.uslegal.com definitions.uslegal.com
Click to expand...
From your citation, "Any sexual intercourse with a child is rape."

Mitigate Sodom all you like. It cannot be denied that this act was a sexual act.
 
Ekklesian said:
From your citation, "Any sexual intercourse with a child is rape."

Mitigate Sodom all you like. It cannot be denied that this act was a sexual act.
Click to expand...
Incorrect. The legal definition hasn't changed in many, MANY years. I've worked in the foster care system and had many foster children of my own, and this would only qualify as child abuse in ANY state in the country. It WOULD NOT qualify as rape. I believe Christians are intentionally trying to place their own interpretations on not only the law, but also on things within the church. It's been obvious for years. This WAS NOT a "sexual act" legally.
I truly don't appreciate your attributing to me the attempted mitigation of something that ISN'T. Grow up and live in the real world and act like Christ would have instead of like some pharisaical donkey.
 
Ekklesian said:
He inserts his nipple into the mouth of the infant for his jollies. What was that all about?
Click to expand...
It's about a confused man attempting to nurse a child despite a lack of functioning mammary glands. It doesn't meet the definition of "sexual intercourse." Did your parents neglect to teach you the facts of life?
 
AverageJoe said:
and this would only qualify as child abuse
Click to expand...

What kind of abuse?

AverageJoe said:
Grow up and live in the real world and act like Christ would have instead of like some pharisaical donkey.
Click to expand...

:LOL: Be honest. We all know you were thinking "ass". Besides, Christ dealt with people according to the truth, not according to statute. He wouldn't say this guy was trying to "nurse" the child.

What do you think He would say he was doing?
 
Ekklesian said:
What kind of abuse?



:LOL: Be honest. We all know you were thinking "ass". Besides, Christ dealt with people according to the truth, not according to statute. He wouldn't say this guy was trying to "nurse" the child.

What do you think He would say he was doing?
Click to expand...
In this case, the statute IS the truth and isn't a variation. As far as what I said, I worded it the way I always speak. You say what you want. Don't attribute your problem language to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top