The Left Applauds Rape of Infant.

Ransom said:
It's about a confused man attempting to nurse a child despite a lack of functioning mammary glands. It doesn't meet the definition of "sexual intercourse."
Click to expand...
:LOL:You think he was trying to nurse the infant?

You really think that was in his mind? :ROFLMAO:


Ransom said:
Did your parents neglect to teach you the facts of life?
Click to expand...


Well, my momma didn't dance and my daddy didn't rock'n'roll, but if you want to take the thread this direction, I'm game.

There are a lot of forms of intercourse that are sexual, not just hitting home.

You pull into a drive-in
And find a place to park
You hop into the backseat
Where you know it's nice and dark
You're just about to move in,
Thinkin' it's a breeze
There's a light in your eyes
And then a guy says
"Out of the car, Longhair"
"Louise, you're comin' with me
And no more movies"

You don't speak as if you've ever been in the backseat with a hottie, but moving in certainly includes second base.

That's sex even if you don't get to third or home.

Do I need to take you through Proverbs, Canticles and Ezekiel?
 
AverageJoe said:
If you don't have sense enough to figure it out, I can't help you. I thought you were an adult, not a child or teenager who needed "poppa" to spell everything out for you.
Click to expand...
You're avoiding the question because you know it's sexual abuse of an infant. Whether or not you want to call it rape is only a semantic kink in your think.

What do you think Jesus would call what this man did to that child?
 
Ekklesian said:
You're avoiding the question because you know it's sexual abuse of an infant. Whether or not you want to call it rape is only a semantic kink in your think.
Click to expand...

You're the one who's so eager to call it rape.
 
Call it forcible sodomy then, if that makes you feel better. He penetrated a child's cavity with one of his members for sexual titillation. (No pun intended, though it works.) There is no real difference between that and rape.

There's really nothing more to be said. That child was sodomized. That's the bottom line. That is a rape, and on judgement day, you will find it judged accordingly.
 
Last edited:
Ekklesian said:
You're avoiding the question because you know it's sexual abuse of an infant. Whether or not you want to call it rape is only a semantic kink in your think.

What do you think Jesus would call what this man did to that child?
Click to expand...
I've not avoided anything. I've answered your questions, and expect you to use a little bit of common sense. I don't believe this is something that is going to happen As far as what Jesus would say, I can't answer for what he would say because it is hypothetical. I don't waste my time trying to put words in other people's mouths, which is something you seem to be intent on doing. Have a nice day and peace to you.
 
Ekklesian said:
Call it forcible sodomy then, if that makes you feel better. He penetrated a child's cavity with one of his members for sexual titillation. (No pun intended, though it works.) There is no real difference between that and rape.

There's really nothing more to be said. That child was sodomized. That's the bottom line. That is a rape, and on judgement day, you will find it judged accordingly.
Click to expand...
You persist in using your stupidity to penetrate my earholes. There is no real difference between that and rape. Please stop.
 
Ekklesian said:
Call it forcible sodomy then, if that makes you feel better. He penetrated a child's cavity with one of his members for sexual titillation. (No pun intended, though it works.) There is no real difference between that and rape.

There's really nothing more to be said. That child was sodomized. That's the bottom line. That is a rape, and on judgement day, you will find it judged accordingly.
Click to expand...
It's not sodomy by any stretch of the imagination. It doesn't even fit the long-standing legal definition of it, nor the SCRIPTURAL definition of it. You can't be too "EKKLESIAN" if you can't even get this right...sad.
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com

sodomy

Definition of sodomy in the Legal Dictionary by The Free Dictionary
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
This is my last word on the subject. I believe Ransom wants us to stop, and stop I will.
 
AverageJoe said:
It's not sodomy by any stretch of the imagination. It doesn't even fit the long-standing legal definition of it, nor the SCRIPTURAL definition of it. You can't be too "EKKLESIAN" if you can't even get this right...sad.
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com

sodomy

Definition of sodomy in the Legal Dictionary by The Free Dictionary
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
This is my last word on the subject. I believe Ransom wants us to stop, and stop I will.
Click to expand...
It's all plot by big dictionary to hide the truth. Only Ekklesian and select set of bloggers know the real truth.
 
AverageJoe said:
It's not sodomy by any stretch of the imagination. It doesn't even fit the long-standing legal definition of it, nor the SCRIPTURAL definition of it. You can't be too "EKKLESIAN" if you can't even get this right...sad.
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com

sodomy

Definition of sodomy in the Legal Dictionary by The Free Dictionary
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
This is my last word on the subject. I believe Ransom wants us to stop, and stop I will.
Click to expand...
You see, you keep retreating to statutory judgments. Thumbing through Playboy isn't adultery—legally. Burning and dismembering children to death in the womb isn't murder—legally. (It's not even a child—legally).

I never suggested that the act being paraded here by present-day Sodom was legally rape and sodomy. Heck, the men of Sodom referred to the gang rape they wanted to do as mere carnal knowledge of Lot's visitors.

But it is rape and sodomy in truth.

It isn't humility or virtue that prevents you from judging this act for what it is in reality. The moment I challenged you to judge it as Jesus would I had you by the boys.
 
Last edited:
Ransom said:
You persist in using your stupidity to penetrate my earholes. There is no real difference between that and rape. Please stop.
Click to expand...
This from the one who argued that the man was just confused and was genuinely trying to nurse the child. :unsure:
 
tmjbog said:
It's all plot by big dictionary to hide the truth. Only Ekklesian and select set of bloggers know the real truth.
Click to expand...
I wonder if Ekklesian took dictionary lessons from UGC? "This word means what I say it means, not that so-called 'definition' that the pagans mean by it."
 
Ekklesian said:
This from the one who argued that the man was just confused and was genuinely trying to nurse the child. :unsure:
Click to expand...
I, of course, apart from correctly calling him "confused," said nothing of the kind. Are you arguing with your imaginary friend again?
 
Ransom said:
I, of course, apart from correctly calling him "confused," said nothing of the kind. Are you arguing with your imaginary friend again?
Click to expand...
LOL. You said, and I quote: "It's about a confused man attempting to nurse a child"
 
Ekklesian said:
LOL. You said, and I quote: "It's about a confused man attempting to nurse a child"
Click to expand...
So I didn't say he was "just confused" or "genuinely trying to nurse a child"?

Thank you for proving my point. Your lies are noted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top