Theology's influence on losing "The Faith".

[Prin.Ciples]

From what I've read, ALAYMAN is just as good as any of you when it comes to a debate. The very fact you have to mention him so often is proof you're obsessed.

Well, there's your proof that he's ALAYMAN!

There is no way.... I would take such a name for myself. No way.

 

[Prin.Ciples]

Are you trying to make the case to ban me? You and Ransom appear to be the only mods here. Both of you are targeting me as a troll when I'm not.

I don't need to "make a case" for banning someone. I just do it.
You are free to post. We are free to critique your posts.

Prove it. Ban me without a cause. Lets see if you have a clear consensus.

 

[FSSL]

Prove it. Ban me without a cause. Lets see if you have a clear consensus.

Well then... do we have a "clear consensus?!" Mitex... are you around?

 

[Recovering IFB]

Are you trying to make the case to ban me? You and Ransom appear to be the only mods here. Both of you are targeting me as a troll when I'm not.

I don't need to "make a case" for banning someone. I just do it.
You are free to post. We are free to critique your posts.

Prove it. Ban me without a cause. Lets see if you have a clear consensus.

I admit, I stand corrected! He's not Poe, he's a troll

 

[Prin.Ciples]

Prove it. Ban me without a cause. Lets see if you have a clear consensus.

Well then... do we have a "clear consensus?!" Mitex... are you around?

That was a rather bad attempt to spell/say/write conscience. I'd be embarrassed if I wasn't so heretical and Gnostic.

 

[Ransom]

Prove it. Ban me without a cause.

I'd say being dared to call your bluff constitutes a cause, so you've already shot yourself in the foot.

 

[FSSL]

That was a rather bad attempt to spell/say/write conscience. I'd be embarrassed if I wasn't so heretical and Gnostic.

"Write" suffices.

 

[Prin.Ciples]

Prove it. Ban me without a cause.

I'd say being dared to call your bluff constitutes a cause, so you've already shot yourself in the foot.

At least you recognize its a bluff.

 

[Ransom]

At least you recognize its a bluff.

Given your low substance/bluster ratio, it was a fair guess.

 

[Prin.Ciples]

At least you recognize its a bluff.

Given your low substance/bluster ratio, it was a fair guess.

It wasn't a bluff on my part. Ban me for no cause. If you can do it with a clear conscience, then this isn't the place for anyone to participate.

 

[Ransom]

It wasn't a bluff on my part.

At least you recognize its a bluff.

Yep.

Troll.

 

[Prin.Ciples]

It wasn't a bluff on my part.

Yep.

Troll.

When I wrote...."at least you recognize its a bluff. I was referencing FSSL claim that he doesn't have to make a case for banning someone. He just does it. I'm not a troll. I'm not trolling.

 

[Ransom]

When I wrote...."at least you recognize its a bluff. I was referencing FSSL claim that he doesn't have to make a case for banning someone.

You wrote that in response to my saying he called your bluff.

You're doing nothing to dispel any sentiment that you're either a troll, or very silly, or possibly both.

 

[FSSL]

Usually when people come to a forum, it is to debate other people.

Perhaps you should start a new thread entitled "I am bluffing... I am not bluffing"

I will give you your own thread!

 

[Prin.Ciples]

When I wrote...."at least you recognize its a bluff. I was referencing FSSL claim that he doesn't have to make a case for banning someone.

You wrote that in response to my saying he called your bluff.

You're doing nothing to dispel any sentiment that you're either a troll, or very silly, or possibly both.

I'm a flawed human being. We've said so much to one another that I might have gotten lost in the battle. This does not mean I'm troll.

 

[Prin.Ciples]

Usually when people come to a forum, it is to debate other people.

Perhaps you should start a new thread entitled "I am bluffing... I am not bluffing"

I will give you your own thread!

Does an ethical Christian usually threaten to ban a user without a cause? I'm asking myself, if I should use your own tactics. Since you have no ethical or moral center, I'm debating on whether to actually show you what a troll looks like or not. Do you want me to show you what a troll looks like?

If you're accuse me of being one, then why not be one.... Is that what you want?

 

[Ransom]

I'm a flawed human being. We've said so much to one another that I might have gotten lost in the battle. This does not mean I'm troll.

OK, well, whatever.

Does an ethical Christian usually threaten to ban a user without a cause? I'm asking myself, if I should use your own tactics.

Threatening to ban him without a cause? Go right ahead. *snicker*

 

[FSSL]

Does an ethical Christian usually threaten to ban a user without a cause?

I see no Scripture that prevents me from capriciously eliminating your account. In fact, you should reread the guidelines, composed by the previous admin:
http://www.fundamentalforums.org/index.php?topic=2.0

"...We also reserve the right to restrict forum user access or ban any user at any time for any reason...."

Since you have no ethical or moral center...

I do have Scripture that tells me not to judge another's motives.

Do you want me to show you what a troll looks like?

I would NEVER ask you to post your picture.

 

[FSSL]

Is that what you want?

THIS is what I want!

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

Is that what you want?

THIS is what I want!

Amen to that!!!