Was gospel of Christ intended for us?

[T-Bone]

Here is Paul:

Romans 2:6:  "Who will render to every man according to his deeds."

Romans 2:13:  "(For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified."

Here is Paul, seemingly contradicting what he just said: 

Romans 3:20: "Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight"

Then again, Paul seems to imply that every person who was made sinful by Adam is made righteous by Jesus:

Romans 5:18: "Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life."

Paul says lots of stupid things. Like for men to stay single or that the faith of a man saves his whole family. Or that it's no big deal to eat meat sacrificed to idols....

Hey Pot meet Kettle!  Oh the irony!

I guess from your blind perspective the truth does seem strange.

And the irony continues!

I once thought like most Baptist. Then I got out and took to studying on my own. You will learn so much more on your own. Ask pastor to explain why the gospels don't apply to you for salvation.

Here's what I can guarantee you...my pastor doesn't agree with your inane approach and understanding of the Scripture.  He is not an apostate, so he wont answer in the way you do...guaranteed!

 

[prophet]

Were these few Israelites Judah Jews or just Normal Jews?

Your main problem is not identifying the DNA. Your problem is a bastardized version of the Gospel. You don?t even believe the Scripture you posted.

There could've been some of both. There were true Israelites living in Israel when Christ was born that could've been following Judaism. They would've been called Jews because of their religion. However the modern jew today is Khazar.  There are also so Sephardim Jews which are different genetically then the Khazars.  It's really simple.  The three verses  I posted clearly destroy the need for Paul's Gospel.  Please use your perfect scripture to explain how these verses are  saying something different than what I believe them to be saying. Is your mind so polluted that you can't even decipher truth when it's right in your face?

You can't logically defer to a body of documents as authoritative, when you charge it with gross error, now, can you?

Sent from my H1611 using Tapatalk

 

[prophet]

English isn?t your domain either...

He is not saying ?Jews do not exist?
He is saying that there are blasphemers calling themselves Jews when they are not Jews. Just like some on this forum calling themselves Christians when they are not.

That is your opinion, based on the fact that you already have your belief.  You cannot afford to change your belief, because that would cause too much of a paradigm shift in your life.

I do not base my belief on what I was told or what I was taught or what I want to believe.  I base my biblical belief on what the Bible says ? not on what it "means."

I have proved that there is no longer a group of people that is exclusively descended from Abraham.  I HAVE PROVED IT.  As I said, you refuse to accept my proof because of your obstinance.  The only other reason would be ignorance.  I don?t take you to be ignorant.

Insofar as any Promise or Birthright, I have already PROVED FROM THE BIBLE that God?s promise to Abraham did not apply to his physical descendants.

I have proved that Israel?s actions in occupying and settling the Gaza and the West Bank and the Golan Heights is a violation of international law.

Stop with the silly red herring and ad hominem arguments (?English isn?t your domain either...?) ? those are so sophomoric, and just make you look weak.

Some one told you that you were smart.
They liked to you.

Logical fallacy:

You are trying to prove a negative, by disproving a positive.
Disproving one theory does not eliminate all other possible theories, and proclaim your pet alternative to be king...just because you are the one who pointed it out.

I doubt that you can even understand your own limitations.

Sent from my H1611 using Tapatalk

 

[prophet]

Why the need for an explanation of what was intended?

Because you could not read clear English. You forced a meaning that was never explicit or implicit.

It is absurd.

I explained this to him, further.... we'll see if he gets it.
Not betting on it.

Sent from my H1611 using Tapatalk

 

[prophet]

Hallelujah!

Exhibit B: This is an example of an atheist who knows his secular vocabulary falls short.

Slam!!!!

That smarts!

[emoji55]

Sent from my H1611 using Tapatalk

 

[prophet]

Well then... it appears that I am not the ignorant one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Now let's not go junping to conclusions.

Ooh, Jun ping!!!

Is that Chinese food?

Sent from my H1611 using Tapatalk