Walt said:
prophet said:
Walt said:
Tennessean said:
RAIDER said:
Each one of us on the HAC FFF has our own feelings and stories from our time at FBCH and HAC. I'm sure most of us can remember a time when we felt things were going great and we were behind the program. I believe we can all agree that somewhere along the way things started to slip. It may have been while we were at FBCH/HAC. It may have been after we were gone. Here is the question for the OP - At what time did you notice things starting to fall? Is there an event to which you can point? What year was it?
In 1981 as a young middle schooler, I went to Youth Conference and saw FBC for the first time. It was the last one conducted by Dave Hyles. That week the Lord planted the seed and that later led to me attending Hyles Anderson College.
I separate Jack Hyles from Jack Schaap. Though one followed the pastorate of the other the 2 were not the same. Brother Hyles was a Baptist and he held long practiced Baptist beliefs. Though these were not popular with other fundamentalists Bro. Hyles believed closed communion, the Doctrines of Grace, and that Jesus started the local church while He was here on earth, not on Pentecost. Bro. Hyles referred to "brethren of like faith and order." He rejected "alien baptism" and would not receive non-Baptist baptism onto the rolls of his church. Remember the Pastor's School when he preached about the church. He had just completed a long study about the church and preached it at Pastor's School. The folks there with BJU & TTU ties were fit to be tied. He also moved his belief regarding the King James Version of the Bible in the later years of his ministry. None of this I regard as a downfall.
I'm just astonished to read this statement. He was so much NOT orthodox in many areas. His demand of utter loyalty has no support in Scripture. His teaching that there are three wills of God has no Scriptural support. His teaching that everlasting life and eternal life are different things is heretical. His teaching that if you win enough souls, God will overlook sin is not Baptist, but Catholic in nature (they have indulgences; JH had soul-winning). His teaching that Jesus was always human is not a Baptist doctrine, nor is his blasphemous teaching that God the Father doesn't understand humans and would wipe us out but for God the Son.
There is no question that he taught these strange doctrines and passed them on to others as well.
Hold everything.
Eternal and everlasting are the same, now?
I realize if one possesses one, then he also possesses the other.
Are you implying that Hyles taught that you could possess one w/o the other?
Or is this another Trinity debacle?
Where I say I believe the Comma, and you say you believe in the Trinity, but we both believe the same thing, when we boil it down?
Haklo
Hyles taught that eternal life was different than everlasting life; one was "qualitative", he said, and the other was "quantitative". The problem is that the God used the SAME word translated both "eternal" and "everlasting". The distinction is false. And yes, he taught that people could have one, but not the other.
Hyles taught that Jesus was always human and that he didn't merely become human at the incarnation. Again, this isn't what the Bible says: it says that the "Word BECAME flesh". Jack Hyles said "Jesus did NOT become human when He came to Bethlehem".
I heard him teach that quantitive, and qualitative were two different aspects of the same gift of God, and I spent 20 years hearing him speak 3 + times a week.
I dare say that you misheard him.
Lol@ "translated" by the way, as if you speak Koine.
Eternal doesn't mean the same thing as Everlasting, and God put both of them in our English Bible (the language that you were born into speaking), so He had a reason to show the distinction.
In fact, some whole systems of false doctrine can be turned on the ear, by simply having the correct definition of these two words in their context.
As for the other point, it sounds familiar, and is par for the course with Hyles.
He, an insecure fatherless son, effeminate in his thought patterns even, was always trying to make Jesus in his image.
I've heard him say several whacky things, like "my Saviour never had a beard, he wasn't some hippy". It was as if Jesus was a WWII Vet, with a Hart Schafner and Marx tailored 3-piece suit, Stacey Adams shoes, Stafford white shirt, and Ralph Lauren tie, a tapered haircut,vand a brick house in the burbs.
Haklo