Wicked "Christian" Catalogs

[The Rogue Tomato]

Need I say more???

I sure wish you wouldn't.

 

[Biblebeliever]

I sure wish you wouldn't.

How come??? Why?

Does it convict you???

 

[Ransom]

Have you considered the amount of books, other written material, that brother Ruckman has put out?

How is being afflicted with verbal diarrhea an objective measure of godliness?

 

[Biblebeliever]

Scott, whatever issue you have with Ruckman, I suggest you get over it.

The Judgment Seat of Christ is very close. And you should not be holding any grudges against anyone.

 

[T-Bone]

You are such a hypocrite...

Speak for yourself.

how many times has Ruckman been divorced and married,

Did I ever claim that brother Ruckman was perfect???

what does your KJV say about that?

God's holy word, the King James Bible says a lot concerning the subject of divorce.

Also, understand though that there are grounds for divorce in the Scriptures.

Jack Chick is a proven liar who made up characters that did not exist and said they did....

Got any proof for this wild allegation of yours???




what does your KJV say about that?

The word of God (King James Bible) says that lying is a sin.

Have no idea who the TB is you're referring to.

When I write "TB" I am  referring to YOU. Or maybe I need to write T-B instead, that way to clear away the confusion for you.

You are a part of the judgmental religious deadhead group

And you are a part of the congregation of the dead. You are a part of the Laodicean apostasy going on right now in these last days.

...condemning everyone who does not believe your unbiblical heresy of worshipping the KJV..

King James Bible Onlyism is not heresy. Being a King James Bible believer is Scriptural. Brother Will Kinney wrote a very good article on this subject. I suggest you go and read it:


http://brandplucked.webs.com/kjbonlyismscriptural.htm

and accepting all sorts of ungodliness just because they hold your view of a version of Scripture.  BTW...none of these guys have done anything for The Lord...
..

Both brother Jack Chick and Brother Peter S. Ruckman have done plenty for the Lord. They have served the Lord well by the Lord's good grace.

Peter Ruckman is a strong defender of the word of God (King James Bible) and Jack Chick has done an excellent job of exposing many of today's cults (i.e. Roman Catholicism, Jehovah's Witness, Mormonism, Jesuits, Alexandrian Cult, etc.).

if and I say
If they were used in anyway for the kingdom, it's because of the Holy Spirit, not because of what they did"

They have been used of the Lord. And all the glory goes to the Holy Spirit. God and His precious word gets all the glory. It is like I said before. They have done plenty for the Lord by God's good grace.
[/quote]

So much garbage so I will address two...Chick the liars, I guess you have never heard of Alberto..or maybe you think they are true, inspite of being proven false.

Then the real laugher ..."the KJV gives justification for divorce" in trying to defend Ruckman... This proves you are a filthy hypocrite...hey BB, for how many"marriages" does the KJV give justification for divorce....and are you saying here on a public forum that all Ruckman's former wives were guilty of adultery?

You know in the short time you have been here you have shown that if your brain were gasoline, you would not have enough gas to fuel a piss-ant's minibike around the inside of a Cheerio!

 

[Ransom]

Scott, whatever issue you have with Ruckman, I suggest you get over it.

Bibleburner, whatever issue you have with God's holy and inspired word, the NIV, I suggest you get over it.

And you avoided my question. How is Dr. Petey's tendency to discharge copious volumes of verbal effluent a measure of his godliness?

 

[Just Ben]

Biblebeliever, how do you answer the post by bgwilkinson about using a Bible translated by state church Anglicans?

 

[Izdaari]

KJVO is a heretical cult that doesn't even have enough plausibility to be worth debating. It's just sick false teaching.

 

[Boomer]

Biblebeliever,

On what biblical ground was Peter Ruckman eligible for divorce?
        - Did all of his former wives commit adultery?

 

[Biblebeliever]

whatever issue you have with God's holy and inspired word, the NIV, I suggest you get over it.

The NIV is not the inspired word of God.

That has been proven countess of times by faithful Bible believing preachers and ministers.

The NIV is a satanic vatican perversion.


I suggest you get a real Bible. The King James Holy Bible which is the perfect, pure, inerrant, and infallible word of God.

  And you avoided my question. How is Dr. Petey's tendency to discharge copious volumes of

Peter S. Ruckman has written on many subjects, Dispensationalism, the Two Raptures, Eternal Security, the Inspiration of the word of God, the Sin, Death and Hell. And he has also written great books defending God's perfect word, the King James Holy Bible. Peter Ruckman loves the word of God, and so one can tell that he has the fruit of the Spirit.

Edit by Ransom: No change

 

[Biblebeliever]

KJVO is a heretical cult

No Izdaari. The Alexandrian Cult is heretical.

If one is not a King James Bible believer. Then they are not a Bible believer.

that doesn't even have enough plausibility to be worth debating.

Well then don't debate with the truth. Just repent of your error and accept the truth and then grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.

It's just sick false teaching.

No it is not.

What is really sick false teaching is the satanic teaching that the 235+ modern versions out there today are all the word of God.  When of course they are not all the word of God. As a matter of fact, they all contradict one another in many places. Therefore they are not the word of God. If you have multiple authorities, you basically have NO AUTHORITY.

 

[Biblebeliever]

Biblebeliever, how do you answer the post by bgwilkinson about using a Bible translated by state church Anglicans?

Ben, and what post was that?

 

[T-Bone]

Ruckman loves the Bible so much..he has no problem disobeying.  Several broken marriages are hardly the Spirit's fruit..you blaspheme to say so.  I notice you avoid the questions about multiple divorces and the adultery of remarriage.  Hypocrite!

 

[Just Ben]

BB, the post by bgwilkinson is on the 1st page of this subject.

 

[Ransom]

The NIV is not the inspired word of God.

And Petey Ruckman isn't much of a Christian.

Peter S. Ruckman has written on many subjects, Dispensationalism,

Poo

the Two Raptures,

Poo

Eternal Security,

A useless doctrine without a proper theological grounding, therefore poo

the Inspiration of the word of God,

By which yo mean the inspiration of the King Jimmy alone - poo

And he has also written great books defending God's perfect word, the King James Holy Bible.

Poo

As I said . . . verbal diarrhea.

 

[Biblebeliever]

So much garbage so I will address two...Chick the liars, I guess you have never heard of Alberto..or maybe you think they are true, inspite of being proven false.

And where is your proof that the book of Alberto is false?

Then the real laugher ..."the KJV gives justification for divorce" in trying to defend Ruckman...

What I said is that there are Scriptural grounds for Divorce. Now is divorce a part of God's perfect will? No, of course not. God does hate divorce (See Mal. 2:16). But we cannot overlook the fact that there are Scriptural grounds for divorce. And the Scriptures allow for a divorce only under certain severe circumstances. And it also is to prevent and stop a greater evil from taking place.


Let us consider a major ground for divorce in the Scriptures, and that is Adultery.

Do you remember reading about the spiritual adultery that Israel committed by worshipping idols??

And although God hates divorce, He eventually put her (Israel) away with a bill of divorcement (see Jer. 30:8).

And this example in the Scriptures further testifies that although divorce is hated strongly by God Almighty, that still, there is a place for it if it meets Scriptural grounds.

This proves you are a filthy hypocrite...hey BB, for how many"marriages" does the KJV give justification for divorce....

I will answer your question in this manner and way, especially since I can discern your wicked intent of asking such a question. Whenever a divorce happens in a marriage based on a Scriptural ground (death, fornication, desertion), a remarriage is clearly allowed for in the Scriptures.

and are you saying here on a public forum that all Ruckman's former wives were guilty of adultery?

No I am not saying that brother Ruckman's former wives were guilty of adultery. But both of his former wives left (deserted) him. Therefore, in both cases his divorces were based on Scriptural grounds. Which also means that so were his remarriages.

You know in the short time you have been here you have shown that if your brain were gasoline, you would not have enough gas to fuel a piss-ant's minibike around the inside of a Cheerio!

And for the short time that I have been here and in having dialogue with you, you have shown how much of a blockhead you really are.

 

[Biblebeliever]

Biblebeliever,

On what biblical ground was Peter Ruckman eligible for divorce?
        - Did all of his former wives commit adultery?

Hi there boomer,

While I am not exactly sure whether brother Ruckman's former wives committed adultery on him or not, what I am aware of though is that they both left him. And that he did not want it that way, but they left him and they filed for divorce. And since desertion is a legitimate cause for divorce (see 1 Cor. 7).

 

[Biblebeliever]

Ruckman loves the Bible so much..he has no problem disobeying.  Several broken marriages are hardly the Spirit's fruit..you blaspheme to say so.  I notice you avoid the questions about multiple divorces and the adultery of remarriage.  Hypocrite!

And I mentioned already that he did not want the divorces to happen. Both of his wives departed and left him. And they were the ones who filed for the divorce.

And because both his wives left and departed from him, in both cases he had Biblical grounds to remarry.

 

[Biblebeliever]

Scott, the more I read your responses to my posts, the more I believe you are a reprobate concerning the truth.

Do you really not understand the importance of the Bible Doctrine of Eternal Security???

And if you think that the Subject and Doctrine of the Inspiration of the word of God is not of the highest importance, well then you need to repent and get right with God.

 

[Recovering IFB]

apparently the KJV agrees with the Watch Tower Society

John 14:14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it. KJV

John 14:14 You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it. NIV

John 14:14 If you ask me anything in my name, I will do it. ESV

John 14:14 "If you ask Me anything in My name, I will do it. NASB

John 14:14 If you ask Me anything in My name, I will do it. HCSB


you notice what is missing in the KJV?