By the way, despite this ridiculous smear campaign against KJVO folks, calling them a "cult" while defending the literal cult that Westcott & Hort were a part of when they attempted to summon demons ("everyone in Europe was doing it, man!" -Ransom),
NO ONE HERE, especially Ransom, has addressed how W/H's Critical Text and subsequent New Versions ended up changing the text in 8,000 places:
or how if you add up the total number of words removed in the New Versions, it equates to removing the entire books of 1 Peter and 2 Peter from the Bible.
Since you didn't watch the video, here's a partial list of just some of the verses/half-verses that have been removed from the Majority Text (not just the KJV, the MAJORITY TEXT used by the Geneva Bible, etc.) in the New Versions:
Removed from the 4 Gospels:
View attachment 1470
View attachment 1469
View attachment 1463View attachment 1466
Removed from Acts:
View attachment 1475
Removed from the first Pauline Epistle, Romans:
View attachment 1471
And the partial list of others removed from the Majority Text in the New Versions New Testament:
View attachment 1472
Keep in mind, folks. These disinfo agents always want to red herring you into thinking we're arguing "from the KJV first", and that's what makes KJV users "a cult".
No we're not.
We're arguing from the MAJORITY TEXT (which includes the Geneva Bible and others) vs. CRITICAL TEXT position. The KJVO position, while a BYPRODUCT of this research, is in no way the STARTING POINT. That's how you know they're lying when they keep trying to push that false narrative to pigeon-hole and SCARE everyone from identifying THE CORRUPTION in the CRITICAL TEXT.
The focus is on the CRITICAL TEXT and the Manuscripts Codex B, Aleph, and Bezae, which Dean of Chichester John Burgon CLEARLY STATED you cannot go with BOTH the Majority Text and the Critical Text, it's ONE OR THE OTHER, BECAUSE THEY ARE CONTRADICTORY MANUSCRIPTS WITH AN ESSENTIAL 1% ALIGNMENT AND 99% DISAGREEMENT.
It's simple. Liars will always overcomplicate the obvious.