Believe whatever fantasies you want, Carnac the Magnificent.I didn't make anything up. It's what you argued, unless you meant he was deceptively trying to nurse the child.
I think someone needs a hug.Believe whatever fantasies you want, Carnac the Magnificent.
Oh wait, you already do.
Rapist.I think someone needs a hug.
Sorry that I misunderstood. I didn't think you would cut the subject matter off. But, you're correct. Ekklesian is trying to insult our intelligence.
LOL. Yes, the man in the video was just showing his affection for the child. My mistake.
Far from showing his affection for the child. Knowing he couldn't nurse the child and doing what he did makes it a well-defined case of child abuse. He should be imprisoned and the child should be taken out of their home. They shouldn't be allowed to raise children...period.
We should start a blog that he could cite. Maybe $10 per fact that we makeup for him?
Not to be snooty or snippy, but who in the world died and made you God??? Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. You've voiced your dislike for the subject matter..please, by all means...feel free to skip this thread!
Peace to you.
Thin skinned much?Not to be snooty or snippy, but who in the world died and made you God??? Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. You've voiced your dislike for the subject matter..please, by all means...feel free to skip this thread!
I'm FAR fro thin-skinned, believe me. I know exactly why and what you were posting. It wasn't that hard to figure out. Besides, I didn't post the OP...someone else did. So, I wouldn't be offended at all. I was just making a statement that you seem to be discontent with the content, and found it distasteful, as you posted...so, I thought I'd offer a bit of free "go away" advice. Please...don't be offended...but, if the posts aren't to your liking, you KNOW where the door is, figuratively speaking! LOL Uh, and don't let it hit you on your way out!
That's right. Sexual abuse. When a man wants his nipple sucked, it's about sex. He forced an infant to perform a sexual act on him. That's rape and sodomy.
You never provided the statute that defines this as "rape".
I'm not defining it by statute. It's Joe and Rancid
that retreat to statute. I'm defining it by truth. What do you think Jesus would call it?
I think Jesus would have had perfect command of what words meant and would not mislabel it something it wasn't.I'm not defining it by statute. It's Joe and Rancid
But I did provide the statute from Joe's own rebuttal: https://www.fundamentalforums.org/threads/the-left-applauds-rape-of-infant.11185/post-228522
You're right, and He wouldn't consult our law books. So, again, what do you think He would call it?
No, idea. I don't claim to have the mind of Christ. Even if I did know what He would call it I doubt I would be able to pronounce it or have any clue what it meant as an English speaker.