While what you say is true, it is also not on us to assume the worse. We should tread carefully on both sides.
We can assume sexual deviancy, since that is his history, and philosophy.
We can take him at his blasphemous words, taken from the Court Transcripts.
We can assume Fornication, since he was reprimanded twice for it, officially, while locked up.
We can assume that any man who could teach what he did, is hopelessly reprobate, and will never be right.
I have daughters around the victim's age.
I understand restoration, but what are we commanded to do, until the repentance is proven?
That's right! Assume he is LOST!
Here is our Commandment, which you are advocating against, sadly:
1 Corinthians 5:11-13
But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.
For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
Put Schaap away from the church!!