Widespread Damage at US Bases.

[Bruh]

Asked and answered.

Coward.

 

[Ransom]

Coward.

You make the dubious claim that it is your government's "track record" to use the military to deliberately target innocent children for murder. Then you call me a "coward" for refusing to answer your loaded question.

I care not what dishonest people call me, and I refuse to play your word games. Get bent.

 

[Bruh]

I answered you already. Stop wasting my time with your useless filibuster.

You and @ALAYMAN are always accusing me of not answering or changing the subject. Actually you both always do that.

 

[Bruh]

I answered you already. Stop wasting my time with your useless filibuster.

Wasting time? What do you think the FFF is here for

 

[Ransom]

You and @ALAYMAN are always accusing me of not answering or changing the subject. Actually you both always do that.

Then don't refuse to answer, and don't change the subject.

While you're at it, stop pretending you don't. That's just more lying.

 

[abcaines]

You don't get to use a girl's school as a training base for terrorists then cry foul when the US blows the place up.

 

[Ransom]

You don't get to use a girl's school as a training base for terrorists then cry foul when the US blows the place up.

Is that even what happened? I was under the impression the school building was originally part of the adjacent base--an administrative facility for the IRGC, though the Shajareh Tayebeh school had been more recently turned over for civilian use (on Google Maps, it's clearly part of a walled compound, though it's also walled off from the rest of the facility.)

Ten or so years seems to me like a long time to have outdated intelligence about a current enemy, but stupid mistakes happen.

 

[Bruh]

Then don't refuse to answer, and don't change the subject.

While you're at it, stop pretending you don't. That's just more lying.

There’s no reason for me to lie. I don’t know none of you.

You’re the one that doesn’t actually answer questions.

 

[Bruh]

Is that even what happened? I was under the impression the school building was originally part of the adjacent base--an administrative facility for the IRGC, though the Shajareh Tayebeh school had been more recently turned over for civilian use (on Google Maps, it's clearly part of a walled compound, though it's also walled off from the rest of the facility.)

Ten or so years seems to me like a long time to have outdated intelligence about a current enemy, but stupid mistakes happen.

Yeah only a stupid mistake.

 

[Bruh]

You don't get to use a girl's school as a training base for terrorists then cry foul when the US blows the place up.

If our government knows this then you do not blow up the school during peak school hours.

I don’t understand your logic. If the terrorist have school girls in there…YOU DO MOT BLOW UP THE SCHOOL

So punish the girls because of where they are born into terrorist communities?

If someone murdered my wife and the murder is hiding in a school during lunch hours at the school and the local police blow the school up…..do you think the local police had a right to do this?

This is exactly what you’re saying. It’s ok it’s not on us blame the guy who committed the crime.

 

[Ransom]

By Duh's logic, the U.S. deliberately wanted to murder Canadians in Afghanistan on April 17, 2002.

Think of the implications of this worldview:

1. Nothing happens by accident. There's no room for human error. That means when bad things happen, it's because of malice, not mistake.

2. This means government is infallible. It can't make mistakes either.

3. Corollary: government is an efficient, well-oiled machine. Logistics don't get bogged down in bureaucracy. Intelligence doesn't fail because agencies like the FBI and CIA always cooperate and never fight over issues like jurisdiction or need-to-know. Orders don't get lost or misinterpreted.

This is, of course, classic conspiracy theory thinking.

 

[Bruh]

Then don't refuse to answer, and don't change the subject.

While you're at it, stop pretending you don't. That's just more lying.

Next time you completely change the subject. I’m gonna do exactly what you do.

 

[Ransom]

Next time you completely change the subject. I’m gonna do exactly what you do.

Have fun with that.

 

[Bruh]

Have fun with that.

I will.

 

[illinoisguy]

Admittedly, accidents do happen, like when our troops fired on Canadian troops at Kiska Island, Alaska in 1943.

Operation Cottage: The WW2 Invasion Where American And Canadian Troops Killed Each Other In The Fog Of An Empty Island

In August 1943, 34,000 American and Canadian troops stormed the Aleutian island of Kiska to dislodge a Japanese garrison that had already slipped away. They took hundreds of casualties anyway — most of them inflicted by each other in the fog.

www.historydefined.net

My guess is that no American said that the 4 dead Canadian soldiers on Kiska were better off dead. But a prominent American, head of the American Conservative Union, came very close to saying that the Iranian schoolgirls we killed on February 28, 2026 were better off dead.

"'It's hypocritical to say that these attacks harmed women and children when those women and children, the young girls that you reference, would be … live a life in a barbaric, unequal society behind a burqa, with no ability to make career choices,' Schlapp said."

CPAC Head Says Iranian Schoolgirls Are Better Dead Than “in a Burqa”

Leading Republicans don’t seem to care about the bombing of a girls’ school in Iran.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Bruh]

Admittedly, accidents do happen, like when our troops fired on Canadian troops at Kiska Island, Alaska in 1943.

Operation Cottage: The WW2 Invasion Where American And Canadian Troops Killed Each Other In The Fog Of An Empty Island

In August 1943, 34,000 American and Canadian troops stormed the Aleutian island of Kiska to dislodge a Japanese garrison that had already slipped away. They took hundreds of casualties anyway — most of them inflicted by each other in the fog.

www.historydefined.net

My guess is that no American said that the 4 dead Canadian soldiers on Kiska were better off dead. But a prominent American, head of the American Conservative Union, came very close to saying that the Iranian schoolgirls we killed on February 28, 2026 were better off dead.

"'It's hypocritical to say that these attacks harmed women and children when those women and children, the young girls that you reference, would be … live a life in a barbaric, unequal society behind a burqa, with no ability to make career choices,' Schlapp said."

CPAC Head Says Iranian Schoolgirls Are Better Dead Than “in a Burqa”

Leading Republicans don’t seem to care about the bombing of a girls’ school in Iran.

www.yahoo.com

This is what I told @abcaines earlier,
If someone murdered my wife and the murder is hiding in a school during lunch hours at the school and the local police blow the school up…..do you think the local police had a right to do this? It’s ok it’s not on us blame the guy who committed the crime.

Not to mention we have no business over there to begin this 2 week war.

It amazes me how people take what our government says at face value.

 

[subllibrm]

This is what I told @abcaines earlier,
If someone murdered my wife and the murder is hiding in a school during lunch hours at the school and the local police blow the school up…..do you think the local police had a right to do this? It’s ok it’s not on us blame the guy who committed the crime.

Not to mention we have no business over there to begin this 2 week war.

It amazes me how people take what our government says at face value.

It amazes me that people misuse the word murder.

I don't know anything about the idiot quoted above but I absolutely disagree with them. The victims were caught in the middle and their deaths were a grievous tragedy. They did not deserve to die nor are they better off dead.

 

[ALAYMAN]

It amazes me that people misuse the word murder.
.

I told him the same here in the Trump thread.

 

[Ekklesian]

Because the Arabs are known to be a lot peace-loving Jihadist people throughout history, especially before 1947, right?

That's irrelevant. If the prophecy applies, why isn't China the Great Satan? or Australia? or Brazil?

If he is against all people, why is it that Occupied Palestine, a.k.a., Israel™ and the U.S. are the Great and Little Satans?

And just for the sake of continuity Tarhead Baptist has confessed that Judaism is Satanic.

 

[Ekklesian]

You are right. Even John Gill, a Reformed Baptist observed how even in his time their behavior had not changed ever since Moses penned Genesis 16:12.

“his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; signifying, that he would be of a quarrelsome temper and warlike disposition, continually engaged in fighting with his neighbours, and they with him in their own defence; and such the Arabs his posterity always have been, and still are, given to rapine and plunder, harassing their neighbours by continual excursions and robberies, and pillaging passengers of all nations, which they think they have a right to do; their father Ishmael being turned out into the plains and deserts, which were given him as his patrimony, and as they suppose a permission from God to take whatever he could get. And a late traveller into those parts observes (w), that they are not to be accused of plundering strangers only, or whomsoever they may find unarmed or defenceless; but for those many implacable and hereditary animosities which continually subsist among themselves, literally fulfilling to this day the prophecy of the angel to Hagar, Gen_16:12; the greatest as well as the smallest tribes are perpetually at variance with one another, frequently occasioned upon the most trivial account, as if they were from the very days of their first ancestor naturally prone to discord and contention.” John Gill (1697-1771)

John Gill predates Zionism. He would indict you as an apostate for what you think of present day Israel™.

Here's Matthew Henry's commentary:

4. He gives a character of the child she should bear, which, however it may seem to us, perhaps was not very disagreeable to her (v. 12): He will be a wild man; a wild ass of a man(so the word is), rude, and bold, and fearing no man-untamed, untractable living at large, and impatient of service and restraint. Note, The children of the bondwoman, who are out of covenant with God, are, as they were born, like the wild ass's colt; it is grace that reclaims men, civilizes them, and makes them wise, and good for something. It is foretold,​

• (1.) That he should live in strife, and in a state of war: His hand against every man-this is his sin; and every man's hand against him-this is his punishment. Note, Those that have turbulent spirits have commonly troublesome lives; those that are provoking, vexatious, and injurious to others, must expect to be repaid in their own coin. He that has his hand and tongue against every man shall have every man's hand and tongue against him, and he has no reason to complain of it. And yet,

​

​

Who has been kicked out of practically every nation for their troublemaking?