Anyone following the latest on Noah's Ark?

LOL!!! You aren't studying the Bible for yourself. You are regurgitating ICC, German liberalism of the 1800s.
You pretended to know Hebrew and you have an interlinear.
You need to be disciplined!!! Take me to your leaders!! ;)

Yeah, apart from not keeping your staff in line, you've pretty much had nothing kind to say to me since the moment I joined. If you don't have anything nice to say, why say anything at all?

I don't know what your problem is, but I have an exercise for you that might help you feel better. Please repeat the following phrase ten times in a row:

"God made talking rabbits and I am a talking rabbit. From this moment forward, I pledge to start treating FFF posters more respectfully."

We guarantee that you'll see results within 30 days, or your money back.
 
Last edited:
Do you not know what a finger of speech is??

If I didn't know what a finger [sic] of speech was, I wouldn't be asking you to explain one.

If I don't understand, rest assured it's not because I'm ignorant, but because you're evasive.
 
Yeah, apart from not keeping your staff in line, you've pretty much had nothing kind to say to me since the moment I joined. If you don't have anything nice to say, why say anything at all?

I don't know what your problem is, but I have an exercise for you that might help you feel better. Please repeat the following phrase ten times in a row:

"God made talking rabbits and I am a talking rabbit. From this moment forward, I pledge to start treating FFF posters more respectfully."

We guarantee that you'll see results within 30 days, or your money back.
Have you tried not being a Karen today?

I ask purely out of curiosity.
 
How would pointing to an allegory strengthen His claim of how He would die?

Pictures were always used in the Old Covenant. Animals sacrifices didn't literally take away sins, but it was a picture of the Savior who eventually would. You're trying to make a distinction that isn't warranted by Scripture.
 
Last edited:
If I don't understand, rest assured it's not because I'm ignorant, but because you're evasive.

Yes, just like there are some on here who evaded keeping a close eye on the registration of legitimate users.

Have you tried not being a Karen today?

I'm thinking of an animal. It's small and furry, it has long ears, and is sometimes hunted by Elmer Fudd. Go ahead, name that animal!
 
Yes, just like there are some on here who were evaded keeping a close eye on the registration of legitimate users.

I'm thinking of an animal. It's small and furry, it has long ears, and is sometimes hunted by Elmer Fudd. Go ahead, name that animal!

I need to develop a new law. Something like, "As a thread grows longer, the probabilty of Terry complaining to, or about, the management approaches 1."

I think I'll call it the Law of Karens.
 
Pictures were always used in the Old Covenant. Animals sacrifices didn't literally take away sins, but it was a picture of the Savior who eventually would. You're trying to make a distinction that isn't warranted by Scripture.
Those “pictures”, were they actual blood sacrifices or metaphorical ? Did those actual sacrifices point to another real sacrifice?
 
I need to develop a new law. Something like, "As a thread grows longer, the probabilty of Terry complaining to, or about, the management approaches 1."

I think I'll call it the Law of Karens.

...or you could fix your so called "laws" that already exist and there wouldn't need to be anything to complain about in the first place.

So how about taking a wild guess at the animal I'm thinking of?
 
...or you could fix your so called "laws" that already exist and there wouldn't need to be anything to complain about in the first place.

So how about taking a wild guess at the animal I'm thinking of?
You've already gotten to 1. You don't need to keep reaching for it.
 
Yes. But as the author of Hebrews says, the blood of bulls and goats could never take away sins.
How does that mean that the real bulls and goats themselves were allegorical?
 
<cue the dramatic music, lol>

@abcaines, you might want to take this one. 😁
I guess I would ask Terry if he's read Chuck Smith's book, Why Grace Changes Everything. Not simply for its soteriological implications either.
 
Last edited:
1) Fellow Calvary Chapel dude…would they (generally speaking) advocate for the allegorical method of interpretation?

2) You’re an evil mod! 😁
I find him to be at odds with CC, both in his interpretive and his interpersonal approach.

I'm still trying to get my head around how quickly he got his first thread closed down by Ransom, not to mention stirring up FSSL.
 
How does that mean that the real bulls and goats themselves were allegorical?

If the bulls and goats are real, then by definition it's not allegory. Allegory is a fiction wherein characters, situations, etc. are contrived to represent a set of concepts, events, etc. It's an extended metaphor: this is that.

Pilgrim's Progress is an allegory for the Christian walk. The Pilgrim's Regress is C. S. Lewis's allegory for his own intellectual journey. Rush's "The Trees" is allegory for forced equality. And so forth.

If the vehicle (the thing being likened to the subject) is real, then it's typology. Sacrifice of bulls and goats actually happened; they are a type of Christ's sacrifice. Paul's allegory of Sarah and Hagar representing the heavenly and earthly Jerusalem is a type; Sarah and Hagar were historic persons. Peter likening the salvation of Noah through water to baptism, is a type; Noah and the flood actually happened. This is that, yes, but also this is itself.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, apart from not keeping your staff in line, you've pretty much had nothing kind to say to me since the moment I joined. If you don't have anything nice to say, why say anything at all?

I don't know what your problem is, but I have an exercise for you that might help you feel better. Please repeat the following phrase ten times in a row:

"God made talking rabbits and I am a talking rabbit. From this moment forward, I pledge to start treating FFF posters more respectfully."

We guarantee that you'll see results within 30 days, or your money back.
So.... no answer.
 
Back
Top