Okay, probably my last reply regarding this because we seem to be talking past each other, but repeating things and declaring them by fiat ad nauseum isn't a productive discussion style, so to reiterate what's already been made abundantly clear....the abuse of a thing doesn't make the thing itself bad/wrong. If the theology/gospel of the preaching/talking group/person/pastor is not shallow 1-2-3 pray-with-me type then the emphasis and clarity of the gospel preacher will be placed on trusting Christ, not the words of the prayer recited (nor will the emphasis be placed on any of the actions of the one hearing the gospel). In the event that a person inadvertantly confuses these facts and thinks that they have part in their salvation, in a Christian worship/church setting, they will be made subsequently aware of their erroneous understanding by the natural process of exposition of the words of the gospel via hearing the preached word. I can vouch for that personally with an anecdotal example. After I trusted Christ, for the next several months as I attended church and started to hear the word I began to grow. One misunderstanding I brought to my encounter with Christ was the question of "why would God create a man that He had to kill in my place (ie, one who didn't exist in any sense prior to 2000 years ago)? Through the steady diet of the word, like the doctrine of the incarnation and eternal sonship, I came to understand in a more full orbed sense that Christ was equal to God in every essence, including His eternal nature. In the same way, a person who mistakenly thinks their own deeds, whether a prayer they prayed, or their baptism, or any other, will come to see their error through the grace of God's preached word and either submit to His Lordship on these saving truths (showing that they are led of the Spirit and born again) or they will reject them and return to the realization and awareness of their unquickened state.