Even if he did not have a weapon Tom had the right to protect his family.
rsc2a said:Even if he did not have a weapon Tom had the right to protect his family.
Said Jesus never.
Just me said:rsc2a said:Even if he did not have a weapon Tom had the right to protect his family.
Said Jesus never.
True he did not, but God put that nature of protecting in his creation. Go threaten a bear and her cubs and see the outcome.
rsc2a said:Just me said:rsc2a said:Even if he did not have a weapon Tom had the right to protect his family.
Said Jesus never.
True he did not, but God put that nature of protecting in his creation. Go threaten a bear and her cubs and see the outcome.
And if the guy didn't have a weapon, I fail to see where lethal force would be necessary to protect his "cubs".
But then, right wing 'Christianity" - justifying homicide to protect your TV since who knows when.
rsc2a said:Just me said:rsc2a said:Even if he did not have a weapon Tom had the right to protect his family.
Said Jesus never.
True he did not, but God put that nature of protecting in his creation. Go threaten a bear and her cubs and see the outcome.
And if the guy didn't have a weapon, I fail to see where lethal force would be necessary to protect his "cubs".
But then, right wing 'Christianity" - justifying homicide to protect your TV since who knows when.
Tanner said:Tom did the right thing. Anyone kicking in your door is a threat and is there with bad intentions.
kaba said:When someone breaks into your home, you do not know their intent. You need to protect you family.
rsc2a said:kaba said:When someone breaks into your home, you do not know their intent. You need to protect you family.
And then the neighbor kid ends up dead...
rsc2a said:Frankly, I'm more concerned with what Jesus said than the law. Where did He say we could waste someone because they are after our television?