T-Bone said:
Tarheel Baptist said:
T-Bone said:
wtyson said:
T-Bone said:
sword said:
brainisengaged said:
Hmmmm. Here at FBC Hammond, if I am not mistaken, Paul Chappell has been invited to speak sometime this coming year. A lot of announcements were verbally made about upcoming conferences, events. I am fairly certain PC was mentioned, because the church's radio program carries a daily message from Paul Chappell and that was referenced as well.
I might add also, we were strongly admonished in last nightt's sermon to avoid these internet sites / discussions. No mention of this particular situation, but just a general "avoid it, pass not by it, turn from it and pass away. Do not speak of it, do not open your mouth or type words on such matters as internet speculation / gossip.
Those type of warnings seem to be making the rounds in sermons these days.
Yeah, because the worst thing possible to happen is to have a congregation that is aware and asking questions! :
The worst thing is for people to gossip about things they nothing about...and I heard with my own ears OC tell his congregation if you have any questions, ask any deacon, pastor staff or himself. I really think a true understanding of the fact that both of these families seem to be apart of affiliated with LBC should be considered...
A wife and 5 children have lost heir husband and he took someone else's life... grace and love is needed not gossip and harshness...for both families.
Here's hoping the leadership of that church has the same concern for the families involved as you have expressed here. That being said, you cannot expect people to trust a leadership that has failed them over and over again...it's not so simply because someone in leadership within the church with the problems says it's so.
I have no problem with your statement at all.
But, I have also had to deal with church members and in one instance a staff member who engaged in sinful lifestyles and things aren't always cut and dry so to speak. And there are innocent family members that you must consider when dealing with such issues.
I have no dog in the fight, but haven't seen anything at this point to make me a conspiracy theorist as to the church's response. But it will eventually all come out in the wash....
I too have no dog in the fight...I too believe we should always be concerned for the impact of things on the family of victims.
My point as I do not know all the specifics of this incident goes back to church leaders warning their people about being on websites and only trusting what their leadership gives them from a limited perspective. If one doesn't trust the leadership, why would they only ask them for the view of the things that are going on. The problem in many churches is the lack of leadership with integrity or the lack of trust in leadership for a lot of reasons.
The part in bold 14pt. is the problem we have had at FBCH since the 70s.
In those days it was not the websites but the Hammond Times news paper and national TV.
They ran story after story about FBCH. We were told from the pulpit that the paper was full of lies, TV lies.
When George Godfrey wrote his letter pleading with JH to come clean, he was demonized.
excerpts from GG letter.
http://jeriwho.blogspot.com/2004/04/good-enough-to-post-see-below-for.html
We were told to be sure we did not read the gossip.
We were to shun the attacks of Satan.
I do not believe they were attacks of Satan at all.
They were the pleadings of Christian brothers to clean up our mess.
Here is a letter from CH. Can you imagine if this was floating around FBCH in the 90s.
Page 1
http://bju.typepad.com/Hutson/hutson1.pdf
Page2
http://bju.typepad.com/Hutson/hutson2.pdf
CH gives a good summery of IFBx philosophy. It is still in effect to this day IMHO.
This quote is from number 2 of the letter and is a succinct paragraph on all that was wrong at FBCH for years and by extension the IFB denomination in particular.
Hutson said, "First Baptist Church has decided not to discipline Dr. Hyles".
What he should have said was, "Dr. Hyles decided not to discipline Dr. Hyles".
Point number 3 of the letter is the old ends justifies the means, situation ethics.
Yes total coverup with no repentance and no getting right with God or man.
We did not listen to our Christian brothers or non Christians.
We denied and denied and demonized the messengers.
Nischik basically was right.
Sumner basically was right.
Godfrey basically was right.
Glover basically was right.
Kaifetz basically was right.
You may find some small details that are wrong but they are very minor. Like Linda Hyles Murphrey's details.
She has the overall picture correct. She is very credible. When you add her to all the others they are totally
irrefutable.
Is that what is going on at LBC? There are hundreds of us at FBCH that realize we have been burned bad.
My coverup detector is just wondering.