- Joined
- Dec 10, 2014
- Messages
- 4,347
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
no value said:RAIDER said:no value said:OK I'm a little confused..."we tolerate some of the posters on here"? I think I could be highly offended at a snide remake like that except for the fact that I'm having a pretty good day today. Am I one of those posters that is merely being tolerated? I thought this was an open forum. I didn't realize you were the grand pooh-bah of the FFF. Wow...maybe I should bow and kiss your ring.IFB X-Files said:
This is why we tolerate some of the posters on here. You deal with it because of the status of being on the FFF! I mean, where are we to go??
You must lighten up and learn the poster on the FFF. IBF X-Files was jesting. In case you haven't noticed, we like to goof off a bit.![]()
Advise taken..thank you.
If I may add to some of the posters comments...regarding speaking with the deacons. Good idea, except in this case, most if anot all of the deacons are the pastor's yes-men. I can only think of two deacons who had the spine to speak up to the pastor. They are no longer deacons at the demand of the pastor.
Same thing with the congregation in general...when you run 600+ I think most congregants may think the pastor is responsible for the large crowds...and who would want to complain about that, in spite of how he treats thos who work for him.
The expectation of success has never been the determinate factor of whether to do what's right.
Sometimes.... doing what's right....... means public ridicule or rejection.