Well, don't let me stop you, then.Ransom, I'd listen to it just to learn a thing or two from Tom Cucuzza's humor.
For only 3 easy payments of $19.99 you too can have your very own embossed doctorate in Wit.Well, don't let me stop you, then.
For only 3 easy payments of $19.99 you too can have your very own embossed doctorate in Wit.
Banana: a fruit.
And I thought your favorite thing was trying to prove me wrong
Banana: a fruit.
I've noticed that theme. If you follow a lot of the arguments through in the end his appeal is typically someone's intellect not the clear teaching of Scripture. At times he points to the "high" intelligence of Rucky, himself, or some other figure whose message he approves of. It reminds me sort of a Christianized version of atheism. Since atheists lack a religion intellect/education typically become their "religion".So the moral of the story is, if you can’t find or understand a lexicon, find a YouTube of somebody who claims to be an authority.
“Whatever you do! Don’t read and obey your Bible.” - UGC
I've noticed that theme. If you follow a lot of the arguments through in the end his appeal is typically someone's intellect not the clear teaching of Scripture.
The ironic thing is, it's much of Catholic theology that devolves into citing authorities rather than exegeting Scripture.Yep!
... and if you don't like the counterargument, just call it "Catholic"
Also ironically, my understanding of Cash is that while he was deeply flawed, he was also genuinely penitent.Yes, UGClown is a sad example of a typical antinomian hyper-dispensationalist. He condemns to hell anyone who does not adopt his "anything goes" libertinism, while citing the notorious junkie Johnny Cash as a role model.
Here, try this one, "secular definition of metanoia" (No such thing: I think you mean original definition):
Why are you stuck on just one of the words God used for repentance? He caused several different Greek words to be used in order to eliminate your confusion.*Yawn* Still haven't properly addressed any of my posts I see?
Here, try this one, "secular definition of metanoia" (No such thing: I think you mean original definition):
How is you argument at all different from asserting this:
"God wanted to confuse everyone with a brand new definition of a word, by using it DIFFERENTLY from how every Greek used it up until then!".
Are you serious? Why wouldn't God just use a different word altogether instead of CHANGING the definition of a word JUST for his scriptures. That makes no sense at all. If God wanted to say, "Turn from your sins and reform your life" to get into heaven, he would have just said it. God is not going to confuse everyone by saying "change your mind", but that's not what I really mean, you better listen to the New Theologians who tell you the NEW definition of "change your mind".
No, seriously. This is essentially what you're arguing for: Labyrinths of delusion.
Occam's razor: the simplest solution is usually the best.
Don't unnecessarily overcomplicate things to high heaven just to fit your theology. That's twisting the word of God.
Think about where it's gotten you: you literally REJECT where God told you to change your mind and say "that's ridiculous". You just called the plain word of God ridiculous! The stupidity!
I don't know if you've ever read this thing called the Bible, but turning from sin is literally defined BY GOD as works:"works" turning from sin
Ignoring your posts, and mocking you, is properly addressing them.*Yawn* Still haven't properly addressed any of my posts I see?
Not sure. Is that the new Harry Potter book?I don't know if you've ever read this thing called the Bible