no value said:Walt said:
1) By spending money on unathorized projects, that pastor is effectively embezzling the church funds. Had I been a deacon, I would have forgiven him, but insisted that he pay back the unauthorized expenditure.
2) I have long wondered if "faith-promise missions" was invented so that churches didn't have to give 10% of the general fund to missions.
I will also say that I have given at least 10%; if the Jews under the law could tithe, how much better should I be able to do? There have been lean times and tough times -- giving has fluctuated between just getting to 10% and close to 30%, but that is nothing to do with me, but rather, the goodness of God.
Thanks for you input and a good observation.
At the time I served on the board I never thought the pastor's unautorized purchaes were "embezzling church funds." His purchases were for the church, and most of them served a purpose. Here's the most vivid memory. Our church had a bus and van ministry (3 buses and 2 vans). I can't remeber how many busses the pastor bought without discussion or authorization. He was limited to a certain dollar amount on purchases. He'd just buy them and we would find out about them on Sunday when we saw the buses in the parking lot.
Shortly after I wrote what I did, I wasn't sure that "embezzlement" was the proper term, but then again, reading the posted Wiki definition (thank you, TidesOfTruth), perhaps it was correct (by accident).
I don't believe a pastor should be handcuffed, but the church does is not "his" to do as he sees fit, and a major investment like a new bus should be considered by the church.
I know that small churches may need the pastor to keep the books/write checks at the beginning, but, in my opinion, he needs to pass that duty off as soon as he possibly can. It's too easy to fall into doing wrong.