Calling out the "Christian" liars and hypocrites on this forum

[ALAYMAN]

I have a life, too.  But it was high time someone called people out on their lies, hypocrisy, bragimony, etc.  This is supposed to be a Christian forum.  Unapologetic liars shouldn't belong here.  Unfortunately, one of them runs the forum.

"And therefore it's not my fault I posted nude photos to the forum."

lol, I have to interrupt this program to say how honored I am to have been part of your sig line for years now, and even though you updated it recently I still have a place in your heart, you lying autocrat!

 

[praise_yeshua]

I performed one more test.  I posted a picture, viewed it in Tapatalk, which should have placed it in cache.  Then I deleted the picture here in Chrome. 

I used my phone for other things for a while.  When I came back to Tapatalk, the deleted picture was gone.  Not still in cache.  Not remembered in any way shape or form.  Gone.

Knowing how Android works (and I'm sure iOS works similarly), when I used the phone for other things, it suspended Tapatalk.  When I returned to Tapatalk, it had to reload Tapatalk, and when it reloaded, it showed me the LATEST version of the post -- sans picture. 

The only problem with having FSSLiar on ignore is I'll probably never know if he admitted he was wrong and apologized.

He knows he didn't have to delete the thread to remove the content. Well.... maybe he doesn't. He's not all that "tech" savvy. He may genuinely believe he's right. Believing your right.... doesn't' make one right.

 

[praise_yeshua]

I have a life, too.  But it was high time someone called people out on their lies, hypocrisy, bragimony, etc.  This is supposed to be a Christian forum.  Unapologetic liars shouldn't belong here.  Unfortunately, one of them runs the forum.

"And therefore it's not my fault I posted nude photos to the forum."

You didn't remove them. You could have. You didn't. You're complicit.

 

[ALAYMAN]

Each person and their rules are different, but under the original founder (Don Elbourne) it was pretty commonly understood practice that in all of the fighting and fussing that went on you didn't bite the hand that fed you.

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

I have a life, too.  But it was high time someone called people out on their lies, hypocrisy, bragimony, etc.  This is supposed to be a Christian forum.  Unapologetic liars shouldn't belong here.  Unfortunately, one of them runs the forum.

"And therefore it's not my fault I posted nude photos to the forum."

You didn't remove them. You could have. You didn't. You're complicit.

It's a moot point, anyway.  Like I've said over and over again, I expected that one picture to be removed.  And now it is clear it could have been removed with no further consequences.  The Tapatalk excuse has been exposed as false.

I was making a point, obviously made the point very well, and it was obviously too much for the hypocrites to bear. 

 

[Ransom]

You didn't remove them. You could have. You didn't. You're complicit.

And I would have, without hesitation, had they already not been removed by the time I learned about them.

I would have also summarily banned TRT for it, too. However, I don't have any control over the membership - only the posts - so that wasn't my call.

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

I performed one more test.  I posted a picture, viewed it in Tapatalk, which should have placed it in cache.  Then I deleted the picture here in Chrome. 

I used my phone for other things for a while.  When I came back to Tapatalk, the deleted picture was gone.  Not still in cache.  Not remembered in any way shape or form.  Gone.

Knowing how Android works (and I'm sure iOS works similarly), when I used the phone for other things, it suspended Tapatalk.  When I returned to Tapatalk, it had to reload Tapatalk, and when it reloaded, it showed me the LATEST version of the post -- sans picture. 

The only problem with having FSSLiar on ignore is I'll probably never know if he admitted he was wrong and apologized.

He knows he didn't have to delete the thread to remove the content. Well.... maybe he doesn't. He's not all that "tech" savvy. He may genuinely believe he's right. Believing your right.... doesn't' make one right.

Well, now he knows he's wrong.  Let me know if he ever admits it and apologizes. 

 

[praise_yeshua]

You didn't remove them. You could have. You didn't. You're complicit.

And I would have, without hesitation, had they already not been removed by the time I learned about them.

I would have also summarily banned TRT for it, too. However, I don't have any control over the membership - only the posts - so that wasn't my call.

That's a lie. You responded to the statue of David post and never indicated you would remove that picture. FSSL removed it and then deleted the thread.

You can't lie your way out that.

 

[Ransom]

Each person and their rules are different, but under the original founder (Don Elbourne) it was pretty commonly understood practice that in all of the fighting and fussing that went on you didn't bite the hand that fed you.

Under Don's rules the OP would also have been verboten because it links to nude images. TRT's little vacation didn't teach him any lessons.

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

You didn't remove them. You could have. You didn't. You're complicit.

And I would have, without hesitation, had they already not been removed by the time I learned about them.

I would have also summarily banned TRT for it, too. However, I don't have any control over the membership - only the posts - so that wasn't my call.

That's a lie. You responded to the statue of David post and never indicated you would remove that picture. FSSL removed it and then deleted the thread.

You can't lie your way out that.

See?  That's exactly what I was talking about in my OP.  These hypocrites do something wrong, and then lie about it to cover it up. 

 

[Ransom]

That's a lie.

Wrong again Yeezy.

Not that your hallucinations ever accord with reality, so I'm not going to lose sleep over it.

Yes, I did see and respond to the Michelangelo post. I did not see the photo of the naked woman that TRT posted, before it was deleted. Had I seen it, it would have been summarily deleted.

 

[praise_yeshua]

That's a lie.

Wrong again Yeezy.

Not that your hallucinations ever accord with reality, so I'm not going to lose sleep over it.

Yes, I did see and respond to the Michelangelo post. I did not see the photo of the naked woman before it was deleted. Had I don so it would have been summarily deleted.

I didn't say anything about last pic. I referenced the statue of David. You left it in place. FSSL deleted the statue of David pic.

You're BOTH not on the same page. You haven't been from the beginning.

 

[Ransom]

I didn't say anything about last pic. I referenced the statue of David. You left it in place. FSSL deleted the statue of David pic.

I didn't suggest differently. Do you have a point, Yeezy?

You're BOTH not on the same page. You haven't been from the beginning.

What of it?

 

[Ransom]

Staves off Zombies! Staves off Zombies! Staves off Zombies !

Shut up, Timmeh, the grownups are talking to TRT and Yeezy.

 

[ALAYMAN]

You didn't remove them. You could have. You didn't. You're complicit.

And I would have, without hesitation, had they already not been removed by the time I learned about them.

I would have also summarily banned TRT for it, too. However, I don't have any control over the membership - only the posts - so that wasn't my call.

That's a lie. You responded to the statue of David post and never indicated you would remove that picture. FSSL removed it and then deleted the thread.

You can't lie your way out that.

You ain't helping the vegetable out with posts like this.  Your chronology is off.  As Ransom has recently said, he saw the pics of art that were nudes, but not the naked woman pic.  There's a difference in the two.  That discussion, of delineating art from porn would be an interesting one, but one that wouldn't require posting pics of nude women like TRT did.  He should have better common sense than that.  And now you aid his paranoid crusade where he calls people liars when they didn't lie.  The same thing happened in the "marijuana" thread, and he gets histrionic when his tootie hurts. 

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

Wow.  Someone's really got his panties in a wad. 

 

[Recovering IFB]

All of this over a statue that if you Google it comes up with a picture of the statue, it got through my filters, should I get a new anti-porn program?
BTW, the statue of David is considered one of the great works of art in the world. And I did see it in person about 30 years ago; the place was packed! Everybody staring at porn, eh?

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

All of this over a statue that if you Google it comes up with a picture of the statue, it got through my filters, should I get a new anti-porn program?
BTW, the statue of David is considered one of the great works of art in the world. And I did see it in person about 30 years ago; the place was packed! Everybody staring at porn, eh?

No, no, no, that's not nudity.  It's fine art.  Unless it's a fine art photography, in which case it's pornography. 

But wait... what I posted in all cases were PHOTOGRAPHS of fine art nudity.  Oh, this is so confusing. 

 

[praise_yeshua]

You didn't remove them. You could have. You didn't. You're complicit.

And I would have, without hesitation, had they already not been removed by the time I learned about them.

I would have also summarily banned TRT for it, too. However, I don't have any control over the membership - only the posts - so that wasn't my call.

That's a lie. You responded to the statue of David post and never indicated you would remove that picture. FSSL removed it and then deleted the thread.

You can't lie your way out that.

You ain't helping the vegetable out with posts like this.  Your chronology is off.  As Ransom has recently said, he saw the pics of art that were nudes, but not the naked woman pic.  There's a difference in the two.  That discussion, of delineating art from porn would be an interesting one, but one that wouldn't require posting pics of nude women like TRT did.  He should have better common sense than that.  And now you aid his paranoid crusade where he calls people liars when they didn't lie.  The same thing happened in the "marijuana" thread, and he gets histrionic when his tootie hurts.

My chronology isn't off. I know what happened. I was making the point that FSSL deleted the statue picture. Ransom obviously left it in.

Is that clear enough for you?

I would have deleted BOTH. I'm just witnessing to the facts. That's all.

 

[Ransom]

My chronology isn't off. I know what happened.

As long as it didn't happen more than 40 minutes ago, anyway.