Drinking

.tim said:
Will God serve me the very beverage that brought me shame here on earth?

The problem is not with the beverage, itself. The problem came because of a lack of discipline.
There will be food in heaven. Gluttony has brought shame on many.
There will no longer be any shame in heaven.
 
FSSL said:
.tim said:
Will God serve me the very beverage that brought me shame here on earth?

The problem is not with the beverage, itself. The problem came because of a lack of discipline.
There will be food in heaven. Gluttony has brought shame on many.
There will no longer be any shame in heaven.

So ... I have heard preachers say that food in heaven will not cause us to gain weight .. etc ...

What about wine? Can we still get drunk on it? Or, will be be non-alcoholic? Or, limited effect?
 
.tim said:
What about wine? Can we still get drunk on it? Or, will be be non-alcoholic? Or, limited effect?

I would assume, not having been to heaven yet, that it would be the same quality as what Jesus made at the wedding.

I don't ask this sarcastically, but would it matter if we drank to our hearts content in heaven? Would it matter if we ate to our heart's content in heaven? There were no limitations placed upon Adam & Eve.
 
FSSL said:
.tim said:
What about wine? Can we still get drunk on it? Or, will be be non-alcoholic? Or, limited effect?

I would assume, not having been to heaven yet, that it would be the same quality as what Jesus made at the wedding.

I don't ask this sarcastically, but would it matter if we drank to our hearts content in heaven? Would it matter if we ate to our heart's content in heaven? There were no limitations placed upon Adam & Eve.

In Heaven, would Fried Chicken and Sweet Iced Tea have the calories and fat like it does down here on earth?
 
.tim said:
In Heaven, would Fried Chicken and Sweet Iced Tea have the calories and fat like it does down here on earth?

Let's hope so!!!!
 
Recovering IFB said:
Biker said:
jesus was very restrained in who he hung out with. His only purpose for socializing out with Sinners was to save them. those that wallowed openly in their sin were not of his companions.

And yet He made plenty of wine for a wedding.....
Yes, Wine, aka medicine in a day where the water was contaminated. They Great Physician used this wedding to perform
one of his greatest miracles showing them who he was. His mission to save Souls continued. They drank and were merry, probably tasted amazing.
I'd partake too... :)


Matthew 9:12
On hearing this, Jesus said, "It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick



 
christundivided said:
You know... I gave up trying to please people a long time ago. Now, I might not drink a beer around someone to avoid an argument, but I refuse not to drink a beer around a "weaker brother" just to please him by obeying his desire.

This not what Paul is teaching. Some people refuse to grow up. Those who reject the drinking of alcohol and certain meats are "WEAK".  The Scriptures declare they ARE WEAK. Our goal is not to allow them to remain WEAK. They should "GROW UP" and realize the truth.

I'm not going to feel guilty for drinking around some supposed WEAK BROTHER that has been believing such silliness for 30 years. Get a grip man. Wise up and see the truth. Your weakness is not my penance.
This is an excellent point.
Some, claim the holy hi-road, then turn right around and want to dictate what everyone around them's liberty should be limited too, feigning weakness.

The truth is, they are weak, and the thing that they stumble over is people allowing them to mishandle the Word.
So, for their sake, you should always resist them, iron sharpening iron, as this will not cause them to stumble over the suffering of folly.

Anishinaabe

 
Biker said:
Yes, Wine, aka medicine in a day where the water was contaminated.

Really? Jesus made huge vats of medicine for a wedding so that the celebration could go on without the guests getting dysentery from the water?

Are you sure you aren't drunk?
 
admin said:
I will take Paul's advice over this guy, anyday... "a little wine for your stomach's sake."


To our esteemed leader, the reason I'm using your quote is because you were the first one the refer to I Tim. 5:23. I don't drink & told my kids not to. If ya all do & did that's your business . But if I was to use the scripture to say it was ok to drink I wouldn't use I Tim 5:23. It don't PROVE NUTTIN either way. So my question is to anybody, since Timothy apparently didn't drink and had to be told to drink the alcohol for medical purposes, why didn't he drink to begin with? I'd tell ya my answer but.............................................






Timothy an x'er?  :)











 
I think whine is more detrimental than wine, and there's a lot of it going on. 

 
admin said:
Read chapter 4:3. It appears Timothy got caught up in the false teaching of abstaining from certain foods.

You pull more stuff out of your nether regions than the average bear.  If your conclusions about Timothy are accurate based on verse 3 then you must also conclude he was caught up in lying, myths, demonic  teaching and apostasy since those traits are also mentioned as a continuous thought starting in verse one.  Of course none of those things are attributable to Timothy, as verse 1 clearly spells out these things will characterize people in the "later times" (the close of the world).  More of those Free Sunday School Lessons eh?  ;)
 
ALAYMAN said:
You pull more stuff out of your nether regions than the average bear.  If your conclusions about Timothy are accurate based on verse 3 then you must also conclude he was caught up in lying, myths, demonic  teaching and apostasy since those traits are also mentioned as a continuous thought starting in verse one.  Of course none of those things are attributable to Timothy, as verse 1 clearly spells out these things will characterize people in the "later times" (the close of the world).  More of those Free Sunday School Lessons eh?  ;)

My Sunday School Lessons are free so that you can afford them AND that allows you to get some good commentaries in your library!

So, are you telling us that 4:3 was not a warning about the false teachers in Timothy's day and ONLY characteristic of those in the "later times?"

Gordon Fee says, " Paul, however, is quick to qualify that brief personal word to Timothy. If he does not want Timothy sharing in their sins, neither does he want him to get caught up in the false teachers’ view of purity, namely, abstaining from certain foods (4:3), which apparently included wine. Thus he says, stop drinking only water. Every other known use of this verb in antiquity means to drink only water in the sense of abstaining from wine. Therefore, Paul is saying, by keeping yourself pure, I do not mean to live as an “abstainer.” Indeed the insistence on abstinence is a part of the hypocrisy of the false teachers, one of their “sins.” Fee, G. D. (2011). 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus. Understanding the Bible Commentary Series (132). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

Lea & Griffin in the excellent NAC says, "One of the problems of the false teachers involved the practice of asceticism concerning foods (4:3). Perhaps Timothy had been influenced by this practice, and Paul now advised him about it. Paul gave fatherly directives to Timothy in urging him to take some wine to help his digestion. Lea, T. D., & Griffin, H. P. (1992). Vol. 34: 1, 2 Timothy, Titus. The New American Commentary (158). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.

In the Greek... the phrase "drink no longer water" (poor translation in KJV) means "do not drink water exclusively." Paul told Timothy to stop his exclusive water drinking.
 
One could also ignore the fact that the early church sincerely believed they were living in the "last days" (as they were and we are).
 
FSSL said:
My Sunday School Lessons are free so that you can afford them AND that allows you to get some good commentaries in your library!

I'm just yanking your chain man, so in the words of a sage counselor on the FFF, lighten up man. ;)

On the serious side, your commentary was nothing more than speculation, unfounded contextually, just as Fee and NAC was.  Later on in verse 6 we see....


1Ti 4:6  If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained.

Paul is commending Timothy for having followed good doctrine.  Undoubtedly he is mentoring a young preacher-boy who has shown promise and calling, not having shown signs of being a heretic nor easily succeptible to being taken in by all the errors Paul is listing.

admin said:
So, are you telling us that 4:3 was not a warning about the false teachers in Timothy's day and ONLY characteristic of those in the "later times?"

Not at all.  Clearly the early church had just as many challenges and problems in praxis and doctrine, but I don't see anything in the text that would warrant making Timothy a pastor if he is showing signs of being a heretic.  Obviously the early part of the letter is laying out guidelines for what would make for a good/mature minister of the gospel, and if after having developed such criteria Paul would have mentioned how Timothy did not rise to these qualifications if indeed that was the case.
 
admin said:
Read chapter 4:3. It appears Timothy got caught up in the false teaching of abstaining from certain foods.

Yes. Thinking that one pleases God by abstaining from wine is rooted in false teaching.

If that's true about v. 3 then I'd also have to assume Timothy was departing from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils, Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their/his conscience seared with a hot iron. I don't buy that one bit. Paul was warning Timothy {and us} about the latter times. That has nuttin to do with the question I asked.



 
rsc2a said:
One could also ignore the fact that the early church sincerely believed they were living in the "last days" (as they were and we are).

One could but why would one?


 
admin said:
Why assume that Timothy was given over entirely to false teachings?


I didn't. I told you "I don't buy it". If one claims v. 3 applies to Timothy about his drinking wine then one would have to conclude V's 1 & 2 applies to him also

admin said:
Those who advocate abstinence today are not doing so because of biblical teachings.

I never said otherwise

admin said:
I supported my understanding with good solid commentaries and the usage of the Greek "stop exclusively drinking water."


In a earlier post {I think on the second page} I posted 4 translations which said the same thing. Which begs the question I asked "since Timothy apparently didn't drink and had to be told to drink the alcohol for medical purposes, why didn't he drink to begin with? I Tim 4:3 doesn't answer that question......And BTW, I have close to 800 commentaries and you can do better that Fee  :)








 
Back
Top