- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 11,047
- Reaction score
- 2,138
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
UG's attempted responses to my posts are so incoherent, so misdirecting, so self-contradictory, I see no reason to respond to them. He waffles so much, we should start calling him "Uggo."
Case in point:
Actually, I said Hort turned tables. (Once.) Not Westcott. But UGC goes on his ridiculous rant based on his own misreading of my post. This is intentional, of course--he doesn't want his claims challenged, and he would rather cause chaos and confusion than defend them.
So I've been through all the claims he made in post #21 concerning Westcott and Hort. That was what I intended to do. I see no need to interact with his gibberish further. As I asked earlier, how many lies can I tally up before we can consider UGC a liar?
My quota is 21. UGC has proven himself a liar, a false accuser, and railer. (Well, he is a KJV-onlyist, so we could figure that much out already, anyway.) If he wants to demand that I still address this or that, he is cordially invited to get bent.
Meanwhile, I hope everyone else found these posts on W+H useful or informative.
Case in point:
So you quoted him saying he turned tables, then you immediately claimed "there's no evidence of that".
This is just like when you claimed Irenaeus "said the church would be suddenly caught up and then there would be great tribulation" but he "didn't say that".
This is how a professional liar works, folks. You have to pay attention. He literally contradicts himself in order to DOWNPLAY plain and obvious truths that stare you directly in the face.
Actually, I said Hort turned tables. (Once.) Not Westcott. But UGC goes on his ridiculous rant based on his own misreading of my post. This is intentional, of course--he doesn't want his claims challenged, and he would rather cause chaos and confusion than defend them.
So I've been through all the claims he made in post #21 concerning Westcott and Hort. That was what I intended to do. I see no need to interact with his gibberish further. As I asked earlier, how many lies can I tally up before we can consider UGC a liar?
My quota is 21. UGC has proven himself a liar, a false accuser, and railer. (Well, he is a KJV-onlyist, so we could figure that much out already, anyway.) If he wants to demand that I still address this or that, he is cordially invited to get bent.
Meanwhile, I hope everyone else found these posts on W+H useful or informative.