Smellin Coffee said:No.
I go to Target about 3-6 times a month as that is where my in-law's prescriptions are filled and I pick them up much of the time because neither can drive.
I've used the Target bathroom maybe two times in the last 8 years and have never seen a transgendered person in a Target restroom (nor any other public one, at least that I can recall) so it is a non-issue with me.
RAIDER said:Smellin Coffee said:No.
I go to Target about 3-6 times a month as that is where my in-law's prescriptions are filled and I pick them up much of the time because neither can drive.
I've used the Target bathroom maybe two times in the last 8 years and have never seen a transgendered person in a Target restroom (nor any other public one, at least that I can recall) so it is a non-issue with me.
Do you feel their new policy will "open the door" (no pun intended) to problems?
RAIDER said:?Target?s harmful policy poses a danger to women and children. Predators and voyeurs would take advantage of the policy to prey on those who are vulnerable. It?s clear now that many customers agree.?
Smellin Coffee said:No.
I go to Target about 3-6 times a month as that is where my in-law's prescriptions are filled and I pick them up much of the time because neither can drive.
I've used the Target bathroom maybe two times in the last 8 years and have never seen a transgendered person in a Target restroom (nor any other public one, at least that I can recall) so it is a non-issue with me.
Smellin Coffee said:RAIDER said:?Target?s harmful policy poses a danger to women and children. Predators and voyeurs would take advantage of the policy to prey on those who are vulnerable. It?s clear now that many customers agree.?
Again, the odds of a predator being in the restroom at the same time as me (or whomever) is astronomical. The odds of that predator attacking a stranger makes the odds even stronger.
Aren't male molesters currently allowed in men's restrooms with boys? How many news items have you heard about boys being abused by a total stranger in a public restroom? No doubt it has happened but it certainly is not a common occurrence. I would bet there are more news items of children being molested in a church building by a preacher or SS teacher or youth worker than there has been documented cases of a predator of the same sex, attacking a stranger in the bathroom. And a transgendered predator? Less often than that, I suppose.
First thing big businesses do in making company policies is to run legalities should a problem arise in an effort to avoid lawsuits. I highly doubt this policy was made without running through the legalities of the consequences and if it was a perceived threat, they would attempt to do whatever they can to avoid public safety issues.
What is happening is fear-mongering. I'm not denying the need for safety nor training children how to respond to personal threats because threats ARE real. But to create fear of someone else based on their difference in appearance, is a step toward violence against innocent people.
Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin Coffee said:No.
I go to Target about 3-6 times a month as that is where my in-law's prescriptions are filled and I pick them up much of the time because neither can drive.
I've used the Target bathroom maybe two times in the last 8 years and have never seen a transgendered person in a Target restroom (nor any other public one, at least that I can recall) so it is a non-issue with me.
It would be a shot in the dark since less than half of one percent of the population self identify as transgender....but that can evidently vary from second to second. Why change or streamline a policy for such a small percentage of the population at the expense of the vast majority of said population?
Tarheel Baptist said:The answer is, of course, that the issue is the progressive liberal agenda seeks to cram acceptance of abnormal behaviour down our throats. This is simply the lefts latest outrage of the month....Cecil the Lion goes to the bathroom.
Smellin Coffee said:Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin Coffee said:No.
I go to Target about 3-6 times a month as that is where my in-law's prescriptions are filled and I pick them up much of the time because neither can drive.
I've used the Target bathroom maybe two times in the last 8 years and have never seen a transgendered person in a Target restroom (nor any other public one, at least that I can recall) so it is a non-issue with me.
It would be a shot in the dark since less than half of one percent of the population self identify as transgender....but that can evidently vary from second to second. Why change or streamline a policy for such a small percentage of the population at the expense of the vast majority of said population?
So business have no right to change status quo in their corporate policies? Would they make the decision if it really did cost them money and harm their businesses?
Tarheel Baptist said:The answer is, of course, that the issue is the progressive liberal agenda seeks to cram acceptance of abnormal behaviour down our throats. This is simply the lefts latest outrage of the month....Cecil the Lion goes to the bathroom.
Or perhaps a Libertarian agenda.
Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin Coffee said:RAIDER said:?Target?s harmful policy poses a danger to women and children. Predators and voyeurs would take advantage of the policy to prey on those who are vulnerable. It?s clear now that many customers agree.?
Again, the odds of a predator being in the restroom at the same time as me (or whomever) is astronomical. The odds of that predator attacking a stranger makes the odds even stronger.
Aren't male molesters currently allowed in men's restrooms with boys? How many news items have you heard about boys being abused by a total stranger in a public restroom? No doubt it has happened but it certainly is not a common occurrence. I would bet there are more news items of children being molested in a church building by a preacher or SS teacher or youth worker than there has been documented cases of a predator of the same sex, attacking a stranger in the bathroom. And a transgendered predator? Less often than that, I suppose.
First thing big businesses do in making company policies is to run legalities should a problem arise in an effort to avoid lawsuits. I highly doubt this policy was made without running through the legalities of the consequences and if it was a perceived threat, they would attempt to do whatever they can to avoid public safety issues.
What is happening is fear-mongering. I'm not denying the need for safety nor training children how to respond to personal threats because threats ARE real. But to create fear of someone else based on their difference in appearance, is a step toward violence against innocent people.
You are misinformed....yet again.
Voyeurism in Target restroom.
http://www.cbs46.com/story/27529761/man-charged-with-voyeurism-in-target-bathroom-in-court
Tarheel Baptist said:And, no, convicted molesters by law can't be in a restroom with little boys.
They are responsible to avoid all contact with children...usually 50 feet or 50 yards, depending on the specifics of the court order.
I know this because our Celebrate Recovery program works with some convicted molesters and we have to be very careful as to the how, when and where as witty to help them.
RAIDER said:One has to wonder how far this agenda will go. We have already crossed legalizing marriage and requiring insurance coverage. Now we are on the restroom issue.
Smellin Coffee said:RAIDER said:One has to wonder how far this agenda will go. We have already crossed legalizing marriage and requiring insurance coverage. Now we are on the restroom issue.
Then one had better go back to the Founding Fathers to point the finger at them for not creating a theocracy in our country.
Smellin Coffee said:RAIDER said:One has to wonder how far this agenda will go. We have already crossed legalizing marriage and requiring insurance coverage. Now we are on the restroom issue.
Then one had better go back to the Founding Fathers to point the finger at them for not creating a theocracy in our country.