RAIDER said:
?Target?s harmful policy poses a danger to women and children. Predators and voyeurs would take advantage of the policy to prey on those who are vulnerable. It?s clear now that many customers agree.?
Again, the odds of a predator being in the restroom at the same time as me (or whomever) is astronomical. The odds of that predator attacking a stranger makes the odds even stronger.
Aren't male molesters currently allowed in men's restrooms with boys? How many news items have you heard about boys being abused by a total stranger in a public restroom? No doubt it has happened but it certainly is not a common occurrence. I would bet there are more news items of children being molested in a church building by a preacher or SS teacher or youth worker than there has been documented cases of a predator of the same sex, attacking a stranger in the bathroom. And a transgendered predator? Less often than that, I suppose.
First thing big businesses do in making company policies is to run legalities should a problem arise in an effort to avoid lawsuits. I highly doubt this policy was made without running through the legalities of the consequences and if it was a perceived threat, they would attempt to do whatever they can to avoid public safety issues.
What is happening is fear-mongering. I'm not denying the need for safety nor training children how to respond to personal threats because threats ARE real. But to create fear of someone else based on their difference in appearance, is a step toward violence against innocent people.