David Hyles being sued

Vince Massi

Active member
Registered
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
1,664
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Starlifter, try high-lighting the link with your cursor, and it should work.
 

Ransom

I know all about wind
Staff member
Administrator
Doctor
Registered
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Messages
8,128
Reaction score
181
Points
63
I tried it again, it just says "Forbidden".
Is that an omen?
To be serious, I don't know why it's not working for you, unless your browser is breaking up the URL in a way that their server doesn't like. Does this work?
 

Twisted

Well-known member
Doctor
Registered
Joined
May 5, 2016
Messages
13,130
Reaction score
123
Points
63
To be serious, I don't know why it's not working for you...
Remember, this is the same guy who can't log in to the FFF as 16KJV11.

His struggles are real.
 

Walt

Active member
Doctor
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
22
Points
38
Do you doubt that she was raped?
Do you doubt that Dave was a serial sexual predator enabled by his Dad?
I believe both of these, but don't know why the church should be included; in my opinion, the inclusion of FBCH weakens her case.
 

Vince Massi

Active member
Registered
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
1,664
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Walt, the idea here is that she is not suing for rape. She is suing for racketeering. She claims that both the college and the church helped cover it up in violation of federal law, and she is suing for damages.
 

Vince Massi

Active member
Registered
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
1,664
Reaction score
11
Points
38
On June 17, 2020, Dave Hyles filed a motion to dismiss all charges against him by Joy Evans Ryder. Dave referred to a previous motion filed by the church and college that claimed that 1) the statute of limitations has expired and 2) that the RICO (anti-racketeering laws) does not apply to Joy’s case.

Opinion: 1) Dave refers to a Supreme Court ruling that RICO expires four years after discovery of the crime, while a federal law states that there is not a statute of limitations if it is a sex crime against a minor.

2) The courts have consistently ruled that when there is a contradiction between the INTENT of the lawbreakers vs. what the law actually SAYS, then what the law actually says is valid. Lawmakers probably did not intend RICO to be used against churches, but if RICO allows it, it is legal.


Several times, Dave complains that Joy makes general statements about the church /college covering up crime, without naming individuals.

Opinion: That’s why she’s suing the ORGANIZATIONS, not various people within the organizations.


Dave spends a lot of time arguing that the federal laws do not apply to him, and that the statue of limitations has expired. He cites some court rulings and laws to support this claim.

Opinion: There will have to be some court rulings on contradictory laws.


Dave claims that because he did not violate all of the provisions of RICO and obstruction of justice, he cannot be prosecuted for either charge, because he did not show a pattern of violating these laws.

Opinion: Dave is not being sued for a “pattern” of rape; he is being sued for raping a specific individual.
 

sawthruglassclearly

Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 9, 2017
Messages
62
Reaction score
4
Points
8
I have so much respect for Joy, and admire her strength and grace. Out of the shadows, indeed!
I agree with you. I was around Joy during this terrible time and have no doubts that what she says is true. I do believe her parents sold her out for their gain. This should’ve been treated somewhat like the Schaap case. (I don’t believe that one was handled well)
Jack Hyles would’ve moved Heaven and Earth to shut it down and he pretty much did! There was a lot of evidence then in Joy’s favor. The pervert, the church and her parents stole her innocence. There would’ve been charges about transporting across state lines, statutory rape, church misconduct, just to name a few.
She was young and it would’ve been very difficult for her at that time. All of the staff made your life Hell if you said anything negative about anyone in power there. She suffered terribly. They still talk about not listening to gossip, but they always make sure that a third person isn’t present to overhear them gossiping! The teachers, the grade school principal (he was the WORST), and the junior high principal were big whisperers. Larry Staab was a good man who did what he could within the confines of his job, until he just couldn’t take it anymore. He did a lot of good to combat the bad behind the scenes. I have always respected him for that. I was glad that he finally left the high school, but sad because I knew what would happen after he did.
I have prayed for Joy’s truth to be rewarded through justice, but I am now resigned that only God will do the punishing, as it is with my story. I hope that Joy can take comfort in knowing that she did all she could. Dave has ruined his life. No matter where he goes, his reputation follows. I believe he did worse than rape and there is no statute of limitations on what I believe he did.
That entire family is broken because of what Jack allowed to happen so he could keep his glory. I wonder what defense he tried to give to God? He made his wife and children suffer for his career. He ruined many people who were truthful and doing right. He also disillusioned so many who came to Hammond penniless. There were no real jobs to be had that could support a family. You were to be in service every time the doors were open. There were no checks and balances. It was a circus! So many people would’ve never been victims if there had been action taken against the rotten apples and if he’d never brought the rotten apples to his church from others where they’d been discovered in their crimes. I’d never have had to suffer if Jack Hyles had just let the law do the right thing.
 
Top