JERUSALEM is not the sole proprietorship of ISRAEL

[Route_70]

What your view is, is what a white, Evangelical, Republican male would choose. It's about power to control the world via religious belief through political power. True ethics be damned.

Not different from the radical, Islamic Jihadist -- except for perhaps party affiliation and color of skin.  Same thing, though.

I believe, based on the fact that I have lived as long as I have, and have gone to church as long as I have that if we (White, evangelicals) could, we would overthrow the governments of the world, and dictate to everyone that they believe as we do upon pain of death.

Come to think of it, that is what we believe, isn't it?  Believe as we do or burn forever in hell!

 

[Smellin Coffee]

What your view is, is what a white, Evangelical, Republican male would choose. It's about power to control the world via religious belief through political power. True ethics be damned.

Not different from the radical, Islamic Jihadist -- except for perhaps party affiliation and color of skin.  Same thing, though.

I believe, based on the fact that I have lived as long as I have, and have gone to church as long as I have that if we (White, evangelicals) could, we would overthrow the governments of the world, and dictate to everyone that they believe as we do upon pain of death.

Come to think of it, that is what we believe, isn't it?  Believe as we do or burn forever in hell!

I agree with much of your point. I grew up thinking Christians were to be separate from the world all the while we were being trained to take it over.

 

[LongGone]

LOL!

Living up to his byline. - "I am here for entertainment purposes only."

It's called a "Signature Line."  And in case you have not noticed, everyone is here to entertain themselves.

Speak for yourself, Route_666.

I am here to dispense knowledge and truth.

You have been a member since May 5, 2006. When are you going to start? ;D

LOL!  Well, since this forum didn't EXIST in 2006...

Typo...May 5, 2016

 

[Twisted]

LOL!

Living up to his byline. - "I am here for entertainment purposes only."

It's called a "Signature Line."  And in case you have not noticed, everyone is here to entertain themselves.

Speak for yourself, Route_666.

I am here to dispense knowledge and truth.

You have been a member since May 5, 2006. When are you going to start? ;D

LOL!  Well, since this forum didn't EXIST in 2006...

Typo...May 5, 2016

And every day since.... a constant bastion of TRUTH!

 

[Ransom]

I believe, based on the fact that I have lived as long as I have, and have gone to church as long as I have that if we (White, evangelicals) could, we would overthrow the governments of the world, and dictate to everyone that they believe as we do upon pain of death.

You have demonstrated by your opinions here that you are no "Evangelical" (white or otherwise), but rather, an apostate. So, frankly, your opinion of what "we" would do, is worthless.

 

[Ransom]

Ordinarily.  Except this case is analogous to choosing between Hitler and Stalin.

The Left have no problem with Stalin, so they have no business telling the Right they ought not vote for Hitler.

 

[LongGone]

LOL!

Living up to his byline. - "I am here for entertainment purposes only."

It's called a "Signature Line."  And in case you have not noticed, everyone is here to entertain themselves.

Speak for yourself, Route_666.

I am here to dispense knowledge and truth.

You have been a member since May 5, 2006. When are you going to start? ;D

LOL!  Well, since this forum didn't EXIST in 2006...

Typo...May 5, 2016

And every day since.... a constant bastion of TRUTH!

I guess it depends on perspective....a constant bastion of truth or a constant bastion of exaggerated self importance ;D

 

[Twisted]

I guess it depends on perspective....a constant bastion of truth or a constant bastion of exaggerated self importance

At least I'm constant!  8)

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Ordinarily.  Except this case is analogous to choosing between Hitler and Stalin.

The Left have no problem with Stalin, so they have no business telling the Right they ought not vote for Hitler.

And yet, there are OTHER choices than either one of those two, which is how some of us actually voted.

 

[Route_70]

Ordinarily.  Except this case is analogous to choosing between Hitler and Stalin.

The Left have no problem with Stalin, so they have no business telling the Right they ought not vote for Hitler.

And yet, there are OTHER choices than either one of those two, which is how some of us actually voted.

Exactly!  Had I been voting in Alabama I would have availed myelf of the write-in vote.  I have done that before.

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Ordinarily.  Except this case is analogous to choosing between Hitler and Stalin.

The Left have no problem with Stalin, so they have no business telling the Right they ought not vote for Hitler.

And yet, there are OTHER choices than either one of those two, which is how some of us actually voted.

Exactly!  Had I been voting in Alabama I would have availed myelf of the write-in vote.  I have done that before.

I did that in the last Presidential election and happened to write in the name of a Republican primary candidate. Yet I seem to get labeled as being a Democrat. If that's the case, I'm a pretty bad one...

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Who on the left is claiming that he is bringing about apocalyptic prophecy?

Smellin, right here on this forum. Try having an attention span longer than a goldfish's.

Nice try. I don't buy into the apocalyptic stuff. We aren't in the end times, if they ever will exist at all. For the record, Matthew 24 and Luke 21 took place already. The Bible records the Abomination that causes desolation and there is no rapture.

My post about the Tribulation Boys being right was about the irony, not the fact their prophecy was actually truth and unfolding.

 

[Route_70]

I don't buy into the apocalyptic stuff. We aren't in the end times, if they ever will exist at all. For the record, Matthew 24 and Luke 21 took place already. The Bible records the Abomination that causes desolation and there is no rapture.

Let's discuss that very interesting topic in a different thread:

http://www.fundamentalforums.org/the-fighting-forum/debunking-the-myth-of-the-left-behind-doctrine/

 

[TheRealJonStewart]

Ordinarily.  Except this case is analogous to choosing between Hitler and Stalin.

The Left have no problem with Stalin, so they have no business telling the Right they ought not vote for Hitler.

And yet, there are OTHER choices than either one of those two, which is how some of us actually voted.

Exactly!  Had I been voting in Alabama I would have availed myelf of the write-in vote.  I have done that before.

But didn't you vote for roy moore?

 

[Hooper]

... and nowhere in the Bible is the land currently occupied by the State of Israel given to the "descendants" of Abraham, namely the Jews.

Jew are as much Israelites as Arabs are. Neither one belongs there.

 

[biscuit1953]

... and nowhere in the Bible is the land currently occupied by the State of Israel given to the "descendants" of Abraham, namely the Jews.

Jew are as much Israelites as Arabs are. Neither one belongs there.

The Arabs are not from the line of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

 

[Hooper]

... and nowhere in the Bible is the land currently occupied by the State of Israel given to the "descendants" of Abraham, namely the Jews.

Jew are as much Israelites as Arabs are. Neither one belongs there.

The Arabs are not from the line of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Ultimately, there is not a single person alive today that can prove his or her lineage. And that includes jews. Modern history does show that the jews are religious converts and that they are physically Khazars and not Israelites.

 

[FSSL]

Problem with your logic...

You say, "Ultimately, there is not a single person alive today that can prove his or her lineage."
THEN you conclude, ""they are physically Khazars and not Israelites."

IF a single person cannot prove his lineage, then how can they prove they are Khazars?

Please tell us, was King David a Jew and Israelite?

 

[Hooper]

Just so we all understand each other here:  The promise that God made to Abraham regarding his "seed" does not apply to anyone who is currently living in the land now occupied by the State of Israel, or to any other tribe of Israel, or to the Jews or anyone who calls himself Jew.

If you believe that the current State of Israel is entitled to sole ownership and occupation of the current city of Jerusalem, then you are wrong.

And here is the PROOF:

"Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ ... till the seed should come to whom the promise was made ... There is neither Jew nor Greek ... And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise."

The above words taken from the letter to the Galatians (3:16 - 29), written by the Apostle Paul clearly state that the promise God made to Abraham regarding his seed had nothing to do with Abraham's biological, physical descendants.

Unless you want to argue with the Apostle Paul.

Only sons of Christ will inherit the kingdom. That's true.

 

[biscuit1953]

Just so we all understand each other here:  The promise that God made to Abraham regarding his "seed" does not apply to anyone who is currently living in the land now occupied by the State of Israel, or to any other tribe of Israel, or to the Jews or anyone who calls himself Jew.

If you believe that the current State of Israel is entitled to sole ownership and occupation of the current city of Jerusalem, then you are wrong.

And here is the PROOF:

"Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ ... till the seed should come to whom the promise was made ... There is neither Jew nor Greek ... And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise."

The above words taken from the letter to the Galatians (3:16 - 29), written by the Apostle Paul clearly state that the promise God made to Abraham regarding his seed had nothing to do with Abraham's biological, physical descendants.

Unless you want to argue with the Apostle Paul.

Only sons of Christ will inherit the kingdom. That's true.

The prophecies in the Old Testament have always been fulfilled literally.  The land grant promised to Abraham and his physical descendants has not been fulfilled up to this point in history.  It is going exactly like the Bible predicted whether you believe it or not.  Quit pretending to be a Jew.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d_SSNXabBI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97nmkKR4tKo